Steve Hoare

Romania ONJN launches €5m scheme to combat gambling harms

Romania’s National Office for Gambling (ONJN) has launched a €5m public funding programme aimed at strengthening national efforts to prevent and treat gambling addiction, marking the most significant public-health intervention undertaken by the regulator to date.

The initiative, titled “Conștient și Liber” (Aware and Free), was formally opened to public consultation on Monday. The consultation will remain open for 30 days and will inform the final structure of the programme ahead of a planned rollout in 2026.

ONJN confirmed that the funding framework will support projects focused on gambling harm prevention, treatment, education and research, as Romania continues to face growing political and public-health scrutiny over gambling exposure — particularly among young people.

€5m fund backed by ONJN revenues
The programme will distribute a total of RON 25.4m (€5m) and will be financed directly from ONJN’s own revenues, in line with Romania’s Gambling Law (OUG 77/2009).

Funding eligibility is restricted to initiatives that promote responsible gambling, protect vulnerable groups and address gambling addiction. ONJN has outlined a clear division in how funds will be allocated.

Approximately €1.2m has been earmarked for infrastructure projects, including the establishment, expansion or equipping of specialist gambling addiction treatment centres. These grants will be available exclusively to public authorities.

The remaining €3.8m will support a broader range of initiatives, including prevention and education programmes, protection of minors, counselling and treatment services, academic research, digital harm-reduction tools and national responsible gambling campaigns. This funding stream will be open to both public bodies and civil society organisations.

ONJN President Vlad-Cristian Soare described the programme as a landmark moment for the regulator.

“This programme represents a first in ONJN’s history,” Soare said. “It enables us to finally deliver on legal provisions that existed but had never been fully implemented.”

“We are launching for public debate the ‘Aware and Free’ programme, through which we will provide €5,000,000 in non-repayable funding for the implementation, by public authorities or NGOs, of programmes that are critically needed for Romanian citizens”.

2026 rollout & actions
As part of the consultation process, ONJN is seeking stakeholder feedback on both the Methodology for the Evaluation, Selection and Financing of Projects and the Applicant’s Guide, which together set out eligibility criteria, assessment procedures and funding conditions.

Under the provisional timetable, project submissions are expected to open later this year, with the first funded initiatives scheduled to launch from April 2026.

ONJN has encouraged a wide range of stakeholders — including non-governmental organisations, public authorities, educational institutions, healthcare providers and recognised religious denominations — to submit proposals and observations during the consultation period.

The funding initiative comes amid heightened concern over gambling harm in Romania, particularly among young adults and minors.

Recent European-level studies have consistently ranked Romania among the countries with the highest exposure to gambling advertising for teenagers, placing it as the third most exposed market in Europe. Policymakers and public-health bodies have warned that early exposure, if left unaddressed, risks translating into long-term addiction, debt and wider social harm.

Vlad Soare: ONJN on frontline to tackle problem gambling
Reflecting on his tenure having been appointed as President of ONJN, Vlad Soare added: “When I took office six months ago, I committed to implementing measures that were mandated by law but remained dormant — from effective self-exclusion systems and stronger inspections to unlocking funding for prevention and treatment.”

“Today, we are taking a further step forward by putting the ‘Aware and Free’ programme out for public discussion and committing €5m in non-repayable funds to projects that Romania’s youth and vulnerable groups urgently need.”

Soare confirmed that this marks the first public funding call issued by ONJN and indicated that a second funding round could follow in 2026, subject to the programme’s performance.

ONJN scrutiny set to intensify in 2026

Despite ONJN returning to the centre of Romania’s gambling regulatory framework through a renewed enforcement push and the launch of its first large-scale harm-reduction funding programme, the authority is expected to remain under sustained political scrutiny throughout 2026.

Divisions persist within Romania’s governing coalition over the future direction of gambling regulation, with lawmakers holding sharply contrasting views on whether ONJN should be strengthened, restructured or fundamentally replaced.

The most outspoken criticism has come from the reformist USR party, which has called for ONJN to be disbanded and for Romania to undertake a comprehensive rewrite of the Law of Games of Chance. USR legislators argue that long-standing governance failures and regulatory blind spots have eroded confidence in the authority, requiring structural reform rather than incremental adjustments.

ONJN Director General Vlad-Cristian Soare has acknowledged the political fallout surrounding the regulator but has urged the incoming government to support his mandate, positioning his tenure as a corrective phase aimed at restoring transparency, credibility of enforcement and institutional trust.

Since taking office, Soare has prioritised the activation of long-delayed measures, including national self-exclusion systems, public registers, enhanced digital oversight tools and dedicated funding for prevention and treatment programmes.

Attention now turns to President Nicușor Dan, and the direction he will set on gambling policy as he seeks to unify a four-party coalition with fundamentally different approaches to industry governance.

Read more

DCMS updates governance remit of new UK gambling levy

DCMS has updated the Terms of Reference for the Gambling Levy Programme Board, providing further detail on the governance framework overseeing the distribution of funding for gambling-related harm research, prevention and treatment (RPT) initiatives, projects and programmes under the UK’s new statutory levy.

The Board is structured to bring together relevant UK government departments alongside representative authorities from the Scottish and Welsh governments, reflecting both the cross-departmental scope of levy spending and the devolved nature of health and education policy.

DCMS states that the Board’s principal duty is to ensure that appointed commissioning bodies are delivering on the government’s objectives to improve and expand research, prevention and treatment of gambling-related harm.

The department notes that levy expenditure spans multiple departmental boundaries, making it necessary to establish a formal forum through which stakeholders can collectively monitor the levy’s progress and performance.

As such, the Board holds collective responsibility for overseeing the overall functioning and health of the levy system, including whether it is delivering against agreed objectives and commissioning priorities.

However, the department stresses that the Board does not hold responsibility for decisions on detailed expenditure programmes, which remain the responsibility of the individual commissioning bodies appointed by DCMS.

New leadership for new levy
Under the updated framework, the Gambling Levy is overseen by a role-based Levy Board, rather than by individually appointed public figures.

The Board is chaired by the Director for Sport and Gambling at DCMS, a position currently held by senior civil servant Ben Dean, and is supported by the Deputy Director for Gambling and Lotteries, currently Julie Carney.

DCMS has published an annex confirming that the Board comprises 10 members, all appointed due to their institutional role within the levy system rather than in a personal capacity.

DCMS retains overall responsibility for implementing the statutory levy. Under Section 123 of the Gambling Act 2005, the DCMS Secretary of State — currently Lisa Nandy — or the minister responsible for gambling policy, Baroness Twycross, holds final approval powers over levy funding allocations, alongside HM Treasury.

The Treasury is formally named in the legislation as a joint approver, providing fiscal oversight, though DCMS notes that its engagement is expected to be proportionate, particularly after the levy’s first year of operation.

Operational responsibility for commissioning is distributed across specialist departments. DHSC leads on treatment and public health, overseeing both NHS England as the treatment commissioning body and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) as the prevention lead.

DSIT acts as the sponsoring department for research through UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Meanwhile, the Scottish and Welsh governments retain responsibility for prevention and treatment spending within their respective jurisdictions, reflecting the devolved status of health and education policy.

The implementation of the RPT levy – formerly the research, education and treatment (RET) levy – is one of the biggest ongoing adjustments for UK gambling, though next year’s tax raises will likely take this mantle from it.

Changes include the levy’s mandatory status, as well as the NHS taking over the lead from GambleAware as the main commissioner of treatment projects – a move that has led to the planned dissolution of GambleAware in March next year, wrapping up over 20 years of activity.

Read more

iGaming Daily: Can iGaming Stop the Black Market Surge?

In today’s episode of iGaming Daily, SBC Media Manager Charlie Horner is joined by SBC’s Editor-at-Large Ted Menmuir and SBC News Editor Ted Orme-Claye as the trio discuss the growing threat of black market gambling, declining channelisation rates across Europe, and how the regulated industry must respond as it heads towards 2026. Tune in to…

Read more

Report concludes research confusion and media sensationalism is leading to moral panic 

A new research paper highlights the narrative gap between academic research and media sensationalism around the gambling industry and gambling harm, which is leading to moral panic and regressive policy responses. The report from Gambling Public Policy Consulting, ‘Addressing the Narrative Gap: Investigating Media Coverage vs. Empirical Evidence on Gambling’, serves as a warning to…

Read more

Newsletter: Christmas reading and a call for peace and harmony

Moral panic Today we highlight an excellent research paper, which should be required reading for journalists, academics, regulators, lobbyists, lawmakers, and industry leaders. Gambling Public Policy Consulting’s ‘Addressing the Narrative Gap: Investigating Media Coverage vs. Empirical Evidence on Gambling’, serves as a warning to all about the dangers of oversimplifying a complex issue. Reasons to…

Read more

Escapism emerges as key indicator of problematic gambling

Escapism emerges as a central but previously overlooked driver of gambling, according to new international research that challenges long-standing assumptions about why people place bets. A study from researchers in Australia, Canada, Gibraltar and Hungary has found that gambling to escape from reality, stress or negative emotions is one of the strongest motivations linked to…

Read more

Ireland’s Labour party takes anti-gambling stance

Ivana Bacik, the leader of Ireland’s Labour party, wants to see all gambling ads in the Republic taken down.

The leader of Ireland’s joint-second-largest opposition party (in the Dáil Éireann) shared her thoughts with the Sunday Independent, supposedly prompted to do so by a BoyleSports retail ad in Dublin offering cash deposits and withdrawals without the need for a bank account.

“Labour have called for a ban on gambling ads. In recognition of the harm caused by advertising to those at risk of gambling addiction, other countries have introduced bans on all gambling ads. Ireland should follow suit,” Bacik told the news outlet.

“We know that gambling companies prey on the vulnerabilities of problem gamblers. It is deeply concerning to see companies targeting people with addiction issues. Labour’s senator Mark Wall has called for a ban on all gambling ads, to stamp out this behaviour. We have a serious issue with gambling in this country, and it must be addressed.”

Contacted by the Sunday Independent, BoyleSports said: “All of our customers go through a very strict verification process when opening an online account. We operate robust processes across all our customers’ accounts. Our process is fully in line with all legal and regulatory requirements, and with pending regulation.”

Whilst the operator’s response addressed its online offering rather than the retail one in connection with the above-mentioned advert, alas it is unclear what the Independent’s questions actually were, one thing is for certain – problem gambling is treated with utmost importance by licensed gambling providers by design.

One-sided argument?
Bacik’s comments that accuse gambling companies of ‘preying on the vulnerabilities of problem gamblers’ as something that is matter of fact could be viewed as irresponsible given her position of power, where she knowingly or unknowingly disregards years of international scientific and regulatory work towards developing problem gambling protection policies.

Given her high level of political involvement, it is safe to assume that her statement about Ireland having a “serious issue with gambling” was informed by 2023 data from Ireland’s Economic and Social Research Institute, which put around 3.3% of adults at a serious risk of problem gambling, while 7.1% showed signs of moderate problem gambling behaviours.

Whilst a step in the right direction for informing future policy, these numbers are of course based on estimates derived from self-reported survey responses and not concrete, audited evidence of where the market currently is.

ESRI itself points out the limitations of the study and the caveats of defining problem gambling (PG) and moderate risks.

“There can be considerable variation between individuals classified as having PG,” the report stated.

“For example, an individual who spends little on gambling but nonetheless very often feels anxiety about their gambling, who experiences gambling-caused health problems and feels they may have a problem with gambling, could achieve the same score as an individual who very often bets more than they can afford to lose, tries to win back losses and whose gambling has caused financial difficulty for their family, even if they do not recognise they have a problem or experience any anxiety.

“Hence, further research on the structure of PG among those who score highly is necessary to inform targeted policy interventions.”

Additionally, Bacik’s calls for Ireland to follow in the footsteps of other European countries – many of which like the Netherlands, Spain and Italy have introduced bans on all gambling advertisements for the sake of protecting vulnerable groups – could benefit from examining the impact of these bans.

Previous coverage on SBC News has found time and time again that this might not have the intended effect once implemented, as seen with Italy’s 2019 ‘Dignity Decree’ that drove one in four players to the black market, or in the Netherlands where illegal gambling websites surged in popularity after the visibility of the licensed offers was significantly reduced.

To conclude, opposite to the Labour leader’s doom and gloom portrayal of current circumstances, it could be argued that the Irish gambling market is actually heading in the right direction thanks to the newly-established Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland (GRAI).

The Gambling Regulation Bill and the GRAI it created have set out a list of policies to maintain this regulatory development, including the Social Impact Levy that will see a dedicated stream of gambling-derived tax being funnelled into problem gambling support efforts.

Read more

KSA hits JOI Gaming with €400k penalty over role models use in ads

Dutch gaming operator JOI Gaming Ltd has been hit with a €400,000 penalty by Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) after a two-year legal process.

The legislative breaches refer to the use of multiple personalities, considered to be role models by the regulator, for the promotion of the operator’s offers around the 2023 Jack’s Racing Day – a major combined motorsport event in Europe.

It is strictly forbidden to use role models in the advertising of almost all types of gambling, including sports betting and online casino. Enforcing this amendment of the KOA Act, introduced last year, falls under the KSA’s efforts to protect vulnerable consumers and minors in the Netherlands.

According to the Dutch gambling rulebook, role models include anyone that is widely known in the Netherlands – from current and retired footballers to influencers. This is because their status as successful individuals with desired lifestyles can be impressionable to children.

Lotteries do represent an exemption where such a person can be used for marketing purposes, but only under specific and very strict conditions.

Multimedia posted on JOI’s social media accounts when the infringement took did include such individuals in various activities promoting the event, such as signing caps or posing for photos with event staff.

While JOI Gaming initially complied with the order to take down the social posts, according to the KSA, the fine is making its way into the public domain only now because of a partial interim injunction granted by the court after an apparent appeal by the operator.

The regulator has proven several times that it does not mess about when it comes to facilitating a safe and sustainable market. Much of these enforcement actions came amid a political atmosphere leaning towards more gambling reforms in the Netherlands.

Most recently, Unibet – the brand owned by French giant FDJ United – was fined €4m as a result of a failure to comply with the Dutch duty of care standards, following another €450,000 penalty incurred by the same operator.

As for the market in general, reforms introduced by former Legal Protections Minister Franc Weerwind to overhaul the Remote Gaming Act (KOA) are still ongoing, but have already proven successful especially around player protection.

Read more

KSA: Dutch gambling oversight improved by Control Databases 

Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Gambling Authority of the Netherlands, has enhanced its stance on the technical and data-quality standards of operators’ Control Databases (CDBs) of Dutch gambling.

The CDB is recognised as the principal data monitoring system that enables the KSA to oversee all licensed online gambling activity in real time.

Under the Remote Gambling Act (KOA), every permit holder must record game data in a near-real-time environment, stored in a separate CDB that the KSA and other authorities can directly access. The database is designed to guarantee that gambling in the Netherlands is conducted in a responsible, reliable and verifiable manner.

CDB orders
Operators are obliged to maintain a CDB that is continuously available, accurately configured, and promptly updated following any operational or technical change. Licensees must prevent disruptions, notify the KSA of any planned maintenance or infrastructure renewal, and ensure that any modification to game offerings, systems or data mapping is immediately reflected in the CDB.

The database must also be kept compliant with the latest technical specifications and data-model updates, the most recent being version 1.11, which came into force in December 2024 in line with the Responsible Gaming Policy 2024. Any failure to implement or maintain these updates constitutes a breach of Dutch regulations and can result in enforcement action or licence review.

KSA warns of shortcomings
In its latest inspection round, the KSA carried out a CDB data-quality review in July 2025, identifying several shortcomings among licensed operators. A follow-up audit in October confirmed that all providers had since corrected these issues, leading to measurable improvements in the accuracy and reliability of submitted data.

The regulator noted that most licence holders had made “significant progress” in aligning with the new standards, though “a few providers” still required additional attention. The KSA stressed that any detected errors must be rectified immediately — and that historical data must also be updated and improved to ensure continuous traceability.

CDB drives 2026 changes
The KSA warning arrives as the Netherlands prepares for further regulatory decisions by the incoming government changes, as the Remote Gambling Act (KOA) is due to be overhauled in 2026.

The CDB infrastructure will play a key role in that review — particularly in areas related to licence renewal, responsible-gaming interactions and customer-risk monitoring.

Reaffirming its stance, the KSA stated that robust, verifiable data remains the “foundation of effective supervision” and a prerequisite for operators seeking to maintain good standing in the Dutch market.

As the regulator’s technology and data teams continue to expand, control databases are likely to become the next frontier in the Netherlands’ shift toward a stricter, data-driven regulatory model.

Read more

A new Gambling Act beckons but final GambleAware conference opens the field for more reasoned debate

The final GambleAware Annual Conference in London yesterday mixed general confusion and fear about the research, education and treatment levy with a more constructive tone than shown in recent years. Leading anti-gambling campaigner James Noyes of the Social Market Foundation (SMF) told guests at the final GambleAware Annual Conference in London yesterday (Dec 10th) that…

Read more