Betway Premier League withdrawal highlights consequences of Zambia tax hike

Tax hikes in Zambia have caused Betway to withdraw its principal partnership of the Zambian Premier League, in a major blow to the country’s sports scene..

The operator underpinned that the investment in the market had become unsustainable amidst the rise in excise duty in the country.

News that the government in Zambia would introduce a 10% excise betting duty tax has been met with backlash from many stakeholders. However, Betway’s significant moves will only serve to intensify this pressure.

Previously, there was an appeal from BetPawa and Betway to halt the tax, but this was dismissed by the country’s Constitutional Court.

At the heart of the appeal against the introduction of the tax were claims that it breached section 7 of the customs Excise (Amendment) Act No. 11 of 2025. Objections included an alleged lack of transparency, inadequate public consultation, and severe economic impact.

Furthermore, they also claimed that it was excessive, ambiguous, unimplementable and financially unsustainable, warning that it could impact their future ability to operate in the country.

Nonetheless, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) continued in its pursuit of the excise duty. The ZRA stated that it had engaged with stakeholders in the decision and emphasised that the duty is paid by bettors, not operators.

Following this, the operators looked to secure an interim injunction to stop enforcement of the excise duty pending the full hearing of their constitutional petition.

ZRA countered that the tax was lawful and implementable in its current form. The organisation emphasised that any interference at this stage would be an encroachment on its statutory duty.

Seemingly cementing a future for excise duty in Zambia, the Court decided that the petitioners failed to demonstrate a sufficiently serious constitutional issue to justify suspending the law at this stage.

Read more

Romania child gambling rates put strain on national support network

Romania is lacking experts to deal with higher-than-EU average rates of gambling among minors, politicians have cautioned.

Comments were made by Daniel David, Minister of Education and Research, who based his concerns on the European ESPAD 2024 report, which showed that Romanian youth were among the most prolific users of tobacco, alcohol and gambling in Europe.

David highlighted that the country is not equipped with enough mental health experts to effectively deal with the nationwide compulsive behaviours among children.

“We are above the average in terms of alcohol consumption, smoking, gambling and online addiction,” he said, cited by Romania’s national news agency Agerpres.

“We do not have enough specialists or enough centers. When I say that we do not have specialists, I mean those specifically trained in this field, based on scientifically validated protocols. These are the levels that we need to develop.”

Despite a plethora of awareness campaigns conducted in schools over the last few years, David stressed that compulsive behaviours are most effectively tackled within the family environment, with parents having to take on a proactive role in the prevention and support process.

The Minister raised the topic during a roundtable discussion in the city of Sibiu, where he was joined by a number of healthcare professionals and representatives of child care bodies.

In attendance was also Gabriela Alexandrescu, Executive President of the Romanian branch of international NGO Save the Children, who provided an in-depth look at the exact rate of gambling among under-18s.

She claimed that 14% of children have participated in gambling for money at least once in their lifetime, while 40% know of a peer who gambles.

The numbers are based on the organisation’s recent study on gambling behaviours among minors, which Save the Children has used as a base to call for a blanket ban on all advertisements in the country.

Furthermore, Alexandrescu added that one in 10 children have a family member who is addicted to gambling, which circles back to David’s comment on family support – showing that the adult is often the one who needs help and the impact of their gambling can be felt by other family members.

On that note, the local gambling sector has been continuously advocating for better problem gambling education and stronger self-exclusion policies to better protect the local population.

With a newly-restructured gambling regulator in the face of the ONJN, it remains to be seen whether policymakers will answer these calls.

Read more

Opposition calls for clarity in Curacao’s LoK implementation

Questions have been raised in Curacao over the oversight transfer of the market’s significant regulatory shift from the Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Justice.

The implementation of the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (LoK) continues to progress following its passing in December 2024, as the country takes on major regulatory efforts to modernise its gambling industry.

Opposition Member of Parliament Suzy Camelia-Römer, who represents the centre-left Movementu di Pueblo, Movement for the People Party, raised the question in Parliament over LoK’s transfer of oversight and when the house could expect legislative amendments to facilitate this move.

She also emphasised her concerns around the mass resignations that impacted the board last month and urged the government to clarify whether these were part of a succession plan.

Camelia-Römer highlighted previous warnings over the impact of the Finance Ministry being solely responsible for appointments to the Supervisory Board and Board of Directors of the CGA. However, she emphasised that these warnings fell on deaf ears and impacted the stability of the bill’s progress.

As such, she called for increased transparency around the reasons and the process behind the resignations. Off the back of the departures, there were widespread rumours that Prime Minister Gilmar Pisas had reportedly taken direct oversight of the board to fulfil plans for Curacao gambling licences.

However, the government has since denied Pisas’ intervention, stating that management of the CGA must fall under the oversight of the Ministry of Justice. According to the determination, the board’s ‘reshaping’ is fairly standard, given it was shifted from the Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Justice, a move that took place in August.

Even amidst the governance shift, the CGA has underpinned that the implementation of the LoK is continuing as planned.

The CGA’s Aideen Shortt previously told iGaming Expert: “The transfer of ministerial responsibility from Finance to Justice is a natural progression as Curaçao’s regulatory framework matures. Having built the legal and operational foundations for the new regime, the CGA is now focused on supervision and monitoring – areas that naturally fall within the Justice portfolio.”

The CGA’s supervision shift from the Finance to the Justice department will be welcomed by many, given the challenges that Curacao’s Finance Minister, Javier Silvania, has faced.

Silvania resigned earlier in the month, taking a backseat in Parliament and moving away from Finance Ministry responsibilities.

Read more

ASA: William Hill FOBT voucher could incentivise irresponsible play

William Hill has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) over a promotional voucher that was deemed to possibly encourage irresponsible play.

The ASA’s report stated that a customer received a voucher from a slot machine in a William Hill betting shop on 3 April 2025 at 11:51am. The voucher had the following text:

“You’ve won a £5 cash match on any game!”

“Redeemable between 03/04/2025 – 03/04/2025 from 05:20 PM – 11:59 PM in any venue”.

Within a complaint to the ASA, it was challenged whether the timeframe between the voucher being received and when it could be redeemed was a breach of the CAP code since it was “socially undesirable by encouraging irresponsible use”.

Despite William Hill arguing that the voucher didn’t breach the code or encourage socially undesirable or irresponsible behaviour, the ASA upheld the complaint and told the operator that the ad must not appear again in its current form and that future promotions must not encourage irresponsible behaviour.

William Hill: voucher not ‘designed to drive repeated play’

The voucher was issued to customers who deposit £50 or more on an eligible gaming machine before 5:20pm on the day that the promotion is issued and valid. This figure is the total value placed in-store, including a customer’s original cash-in and subsequent winnings played again.

Evidence was provided by William Hill to the ASA that the average cash-in in relation to the three-day promotion was “below the average spend for April and May 2025”. Therefore, the operator felt the amount that must be spent “to qualify for the promotion was substantial, nor that the promotion encouraged excessive staking”.

As it was a £5 voucher and could be spent on any game, the operator believed the promotion was “a low-value, one-off reward” and didn’t “involve any progressive elements, wagering multipliers, or additional conditions beyond what was initially displayed”.

William Hill noted it was “not part of a broader incentive structure nor designed to drive repeated play”, adding that the promotion’s terms, including the staking threshold and the redemption timeframe, were “clearly and fully” communicated to customers, and they were “given sufficient information to make an informed decision before participating”.

In addition, key qualifying conditions were “displayed on digital promotional screens in the shop and the voucher reiterated those eligibility conditions”, with the voucher serving as a “confirmation of eligibility which reminded consumers of the pre-disclosed redemption timeframe”.

William Hill also argued that the voucher’s redemption was entirely optional and that customers were free to not redeem the voucher or return later the same day. The operator supplied data too, showing that most customers who qualified for the voucher didn’t redeem it, which they believed demonstrated that customers knew redemption was optional.

The operator described the £5 voucher as ‘modest’ value and “did not believe that at any stage the promotion encouraged a customer to remain on the premises to engage in excessive consumption, nor encouraged irresponsible use”.

Although the promotion began at a later time than when the voucher was awarded, William Hill stated that it “did not encourage participants to remain on the premises and therefore it did not create any time-sensitive pressure to continue playing”, adding that very few customers redeemed the voucher within two hours, with most waiting three hours.

The operator said that the extended time between the voucher being issued and redeemed “strongly indicated” that most customers left and returned later to redeem the voucher, undermining the suggestion that the redemption window “pressured customers to remain in-shop or extend their play”.

William Hill added that any concerns regarding customer behaviour would have been met with a response in line with their polices, as all staff in their shops have received training to identify signs of gambling-related harm, and gaming machines provide prompts to remind customers of their time and money spent and allow customers to set limits.

ASA calls voucher ‘irresponsible’

Acknowledging the operator’s point of view, the ASA has upheld the complaint against William Hill since the timeframe of when the voucher is issued and redeemable “created an incentive for repeated play within a short period, including visiting the betting shop twice in a single day, increasing the risk of consumers gambling more than they otherwise would”.

Since the redemption period was at a later point in the day, the authority noted that participants could only benefit if they returned to the premises or stayed until the start time of the promotion, and that those eligible for the voucher may have already placed several bets earlier the same day.

“We thus considered that linking the reward to a same-day timeframe, particularly at a limited period later on the day, incentivised behaviours that could encourage irresponsible use,” the ASA stated.

“For those reasons, we concluded that the promotion encouraged irresponsible use and breached the Code”, particularly CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 8.5 (Protection of consumers, safety and suitability).

William Hill was told by the ASA that the advert must not appear again in the form complained of and that future promotions must not encourage irresponsible behaviour.

Read more

KSA Chairman: Gambling needs collective accountability to kill black market hydra

Michel Groothuizen, Chairman of the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Gambling Authority of the Netherlands has declared that illegal gambling is now the principal threat to every regulated jurisdiction.

Speaking at the IAGR 2025 Conference in Toronto, Groothuizen urged regulators to “take ownership” of illegal gambling threats and called for the creation of an Interpol-style international network to coordinate global enforcement and information sharing.
“Illegal gambling is no longer a peripheral problem — it is the principal threat to every regulated market in the world,” he said. “We must act together as if we are the issue owner here.”

A 21st-century battle
Groothuizen described the challenge facing regulators as a technological mismatch between agile criminal networks and slow-moving authorities.

“It feels like we’re fighting a 21st-century war with medieval tech,” IAGR delegates were told. “Bigger and bolder ideas are needed to fight the black market, and that requires a deeper pool of stakeholders with technical expertise.”

He explained that current enforcement tools were designed in an earlier era of gambling regulation, long before the rise of smartphones, crypto transactions and AI-driven marketing — innovations that have transformed how unlicensed operators reach consumers.

“The incredible worldwide rise of smartphones and the incredibly fast growth of technology have made it harder to reach our goals, instead of easier,” he added.

Black Market is never stationary
The KSA Chair said the illegal sector has evolved into a fast-moving global ecosystem that consistently outpaces national law enforcement while threatening consumer safety.

“Illegal operators are innovative and agile. They are our most difficult opponent,” he warned. “We are battling a 21st-century opponent with outdated technology, and that puts us at a natural disadvantage.”

In the Netherlands, the issue has reached critical levels. While over 90% of players still use legal sites, the GGR-based channelisation rate has dropped below 50%, meaning half of all gambling spend now flows to unlicensed operators.

“We warned the government for a tsunami of advertising—and were proved right,” he said. “But if the market gives way to illegal actors, the situation will only worsen.”

He explained that advertising restrictions, while politically popular, have inadvertently pushed consumers towards the very black market the Dutch regime was designed to contain.

Thinking beyond political sensitivities

Groothuizen acknowledged that Dutch policymakers now view gambling as a “high-risk product”, shifting away from the liberalisation agenda that defined the 2021 market opening.

Since 2023, the government has banned celebrity endorsements, outlawed untargeted advertising, and imposed a €700 monthly deposit limit per operator.

“This change of direction is driven by the idea that existing policies do not protect people adequately,” he stated but warned of “ the risk is that overregulation pushes consumers towards unsafe, unaccountable environments—precisely the outcome our laws were designed to prevent.”

He cautioned that the growing compliance burden, combined with declining GGR, has made it harder for licensed firms to compete with unlicensed operators which face none of these constraints.

Though political sensitivities have changed towards gambling since regulation, a complete fallout could be witnessed to the black market.

Big Tech must be engaged
The KSA Chairman stressed that defeating the black market will be impossible without confronting its digital and financial enablers.

“There’s no escaping Big Tech’s involvement,” Groothuizen said. “Social media platforms are the frontline where many consumers encounter illegal gambling for the first time.”

He described how rogue operators buy up expired Dutch web domains — from restaurants and schools to coaches and small businesses — to boost their SEO rankings and funnel users to illegal sites. Influencers, he warned, are being used to promote offshore casinos to young audiences through livestreams.

“Those who do not know that an illegal website exists are not likely to visit it. And those who cannot make a deposit will quickly leave,” he said. “The solution must therefore include the actors who make the market possible in the first place.”

He urged regulators to engage directly with technology platforms and payment providers, or, failing that, push for EU-mandated minimum standards modelled on anti-money-laundering rules.

“We must engage with these parties, but we must also not be afraid to stir things up and act against them ourselves,” he said. “If we do not encounter enough cooperation, then European institutions must step in.”

Towards a Gambling Interpol
Groothuizen’s most ambitious proposal is the formation of a “gambling Interpol” — an international framework through which regulators can share intelligence, coordinate enforcement and apply collective pressure on enablers of the illegal trade.
“Let us put our efforts mainly into a sort of gambling Interpol — first Europe-wide, then perhaps worldwide,” he proposed. “The illegal market knows no borders. Our cooperation should be no different.”

He explained that existing bilateral efforts have proved insufficient. Illegal operators reappear under new domains within hours, nullifying traditional enforcement tactics.

“It’s like battling a Hydra — cut off one head, and two more appear,” he warned.

Groothuizen closed his speech by reframing the fight against illegal gambling as a matter of shared global responsibility rather than national jurisdiction.

“One might wonder who ultimately bears responsibility: the regulators, the politicians, or the big companies in tech and finance that help keep the market running,” he said. “But the fact that there is no clear answer does not absolve us.”

He called on regulators, governments, and industry partners to treat the protection of consumers as a collective moral duty… “Let us all act as if we are the issue owner here,” he concluded.

“Only by taking ownership together can we create an ecosystem capable of protecting players and striking a real blow to the illegal market.”

Read more

Former EMU basketball players fail to comply with NCAA gambling probe

Three former college basketball players tied to alleged sports betting violations failed to cooperate with an investigation initiated by the national governing body of college sports.

The NCAA announced that three former men’s basketball student-athletes at Eastern Michigan failed to comply with an investigation into potential sports wagering violations.

The three former players, Jalin Billingsley, Da’Sean Nelson and Jalen Terry, are no longer enrolled at Eastern Michigan or with the men’s basketball program. The players also have no remaining collegiate eligibility and faced potential permanent ineligibility.

“When individuals choose not to cooperate—particularly when cases involve potential integrity issues—those choices can and will be met with serious consequences, including prohibitions on athletically related activities, the loss of eligibility and/or being publicly named in an infractions decision,” said the Division I Committee on Infractions.

Active NCAA bylaws prohibit wa..

Read more

South Africa and Nigeria make major AML strides

Amid ongoing debates over tax policy and regulatory enforcement across Africa’s gambling markets, Nigeria and South Africa reinforced the credibility and stability of their regulated sectors this week.

With regulatory disruptions rife across Africa, the developments in two of the continent’s most significant markets have progressed the legitimacy of gambling across Africa.

South Africa was removed from the AML grey list after originally being added in February of 2023.

In its official announcement, the FATF stated that South Africa strengthened the effectiveness of its AML/CFT regime to meet the commitments in its action plan.

This included a sustained increase in outbound mutual legal assistance (MLA) requests facilitating ML/TF investigations and asset confiscations aligned with its risk profile.

As well as this, the country took steps to bolster risk-based supervision of DNFBPs (designated non-financial business & professions).

Now that South Africa has been removed from the greylist, the country will have to adhere to stricter stipulations, however. Notably, the sanctions which could be implemented as a result of non-compliance with FATF frameworks have been heightened.

Amongst other issues, there was also a sustained increase in investigations and prosecutions of serious and complex money-laundering and the full range of TF activities aligned with its risk profile.

Nigeria spent the same length of time on the grey list, the country was lauded for demonstrating sustained increases in money laundering investigations and prosecutions, proactive detection of currency declaration violations, and maintained comprehensive data on frozen/seized/confiscated assets.

The South Africa gambling framework is potentially on the cusp of a period of transformation as the country seeks to find balance between enabling growth and ensuring player protection. This has included significant lobbying in the country for a tightening of restrictions on gambling adverts.

Nigeria has also taken steps to significantly tighten the frameworks around its crypto sector tackling the ability of the sector to engage with users in the country.

Discussions over the gambling framework in Nigeria remain prevalent, specifically concerning the impact of Nigeria’s Central Gaming Bill.

Many reports in the country suggest there are fears around the bill diluting the control of the lottery from the state, leading to a petition being put forward pursuing the rejection of the bill.

Pursuit of the rejection of the bill largely comes from the Federation of States Gaming Regulators of Nigeria (FSGRN), underpinning major concerns over the way the establishment of a Central Commission would have on fiscal federalism in Nigeria.

A petition was released aiming to ensure that a central regulator can’t provide state licenses to operators, ensuring that this remains the responsibility of the state.

Nonetheless, the government has continually put forward the case that because iGaming crosses borders this should be the role of a universal operators.

The protection of state revenue is also integral to the bill, with fears it would be lost in the result of the formation of a nationwide commission.

The petition is calling for the nationwide governmental regulation to only oversee the FCT, which is where Abuja is located.

Rallying against the bill, the case has been put forward that it is unconstitutional and simply doesn’t align with the country’s federal system.

However, no matter how fervent and vocal opposition to the bill is, it may well be futile as the Bill has already progressed beyond its third reading in the National Assembly.

There is still a level convolution to its progress though, which will provide state regulators with optimism that it can be halted with enough friction.

Proponents of the bill have argued that it can eradicate growth of illicit operations and boost efficiency within the licensing process.

Mozambique and Burkina Faso were also removed from the list as a result of the steps they have taken to clean their respective frameworks.

Read more

Gambling industry responds to NBA’s latest gambling scandal

The NBA found itself embroiled in another gambling-related controversy, leading key stakeholders in the gaming industry to respond to a new round of allegations.

Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncy Billups, Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier and former Cleveland Cavaliers guard and assistant coach Damon Jones were arrested on Thursday following an FBI investigation that found alleged misconduct tied to gambling.

The three NBA personnel were among more than 30 people arrested after the FBI uncovered alleged illegal gambling and wire fraud worth tens of millions of dollars.

NBA coach allegedly involved in rigged poker games

Billups, who coached in Portland’s season opener earlier this week, was allegedly involved in an illegal, rigged poker operation with ties to the Italian Mafia, according to U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York Joseph Nocella Jr. The alleged operation offered rigged games that used advanced technology to read and shuffle cards.

“Today’s events are ..

Read more

Canada’s attempt to federally regulate betting ads advances

The Canadian Senate has given fast-track approval to a senator’s latest attempt to establish national regulatory guidelines for online sports betting advertising.

Sen. Marty Deacon’s S-211 was expedited at the committee stage earlier this month and approved without opposition via voice vote on the full chamber floor on Tuesday. It will now head before the House of Commons, where the same effort under a different bill (S-269) hit a roadblock last year amid upheaval in the legislature and the ultimate resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

The National Framework on Sports Betting Advertising Bill would mandate that Canada’s Minister of Canadian Heritage must consult and collaborate with various stakeholders to establish a national framework on sports betting advertising.

The framework would focus on identifying ways to regulate betting ads in Canada, with a view to restricting their use, number, scope or location. It would also compel the Canadian government to identify measure..

Read more

EGBA launches standards for responsible influencer marketing

The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) has teamed up with the European Advertising Standards Alliance (EASA) to launch a new set of standards for responsible influencer marketing across Europe’s gambling sector.The Pledge on Responsible Influencer Marketing in Online Gambling  is the first industry-wide set of influencer marketing standards in Europe’s gambling sector. EGBA Secretary…

Read more