Steve Hoare

Georgia self-exclusion surges as PM tightens gambling orders 

The government of Georgia continues to toughen the compliance enforcement of the gambling industry.

Following sweeps conducted by the Georgian Revenue Service details over 30,000 citizens have been added to the government’s new centralised national self-exclusion system up by 4,000 since May.

The enforcement follows drastic regulatory reforms introduced in 2024 by the direct order of Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili, who placed the Revenue Service to oversee penalty enforcements and the surveillance of gambling licences.

As of June 2024, Georgia raised the legal gambling age to 25, a measure backed by the introduction of “biometric Id checks across all licensed venues”, with a view to directly bar a swathe of the population from participating entirely.

Public-sector employees and individuals with criminal convictions, numbering some 1.5 million citizens, are now prohibited from gambling under recent amendments to Georgia’s Code of Administrative Offences. The measures reflect an effort to align policy with growing concerns about addiction, debt, and the social costs of gaming.

The exclusion registry, which previously required institutional approval, can now be accessed directly by individuals. Of the 30,451 currently listed, the vast majority (30,392) joined voluntarily. The remainder were added by court order.

As reported by SBCEurasia.com: “Those on the list are banned from gambling on any licensed platform, online or offline, for five years. Removal is only possible in two cases: renunciation of citizenship, or by judicial review three years after initial registration.”

Technological controls have also been tightened. Biometric identification systems, now mandatory at casinos and betting halls, are designed to verify age and identity at point of entry. Officials say the same infrastructure supports secure, confidential access to the exclusion list, and ensures compliance with privacy laws.

Yet more changes may be on the way. While the government has already imposed heavier licensing fees on operators, it is now weighing whether to raise the tax on player winnings from 2% to 5%. A decision is expected as part of the new national budget, due before the end of 2025.

The biometric controls, age restrictions, and exclusion orders unprecedented in the region have raised concerns about compliance costs and potential impact on investment. Meanwhile, ambiguity remains over future tax policy, including the potential rise in withholding on player winnings.

As PM Garibashvili cites that he will continue to crack the whip, the message is clear: gambling may remain a part of Georgia’s economy, but it will be tolerated only on the state terms only.

Read more

Labour lines drawn as UK politics’ betting shop debate heats up

Labour MP Dawn Butler has called on the government to push for councils to put a stop to the “rapid spread” of betting shops, but the governing party’s members’ views on gambling do not always line up.

Butler’s Brent East constituency, she noted, already has more than 100 gambling premises, which she said has pushed her to campaign to call for more preventative measures against companies targeting the high streets.

A familiar topic has arisen, the question of whether bookmakers target more vulnerable communities, as Butler notes: “Why are there barely any betting shops in Canary Wharf but rows of them in places like Bethnal Green?”

“It’s not by accident”
Butler argued that Aim to Permit makes it easy for betting companies to target less wealthy areas, stating that “It’s time to end it.”

The Aim to Permit clause currently limits the power of local councils to refuse applications for new gambling establishments. Some politicians, both at the local and national level, have been calling for local governments to gain greater powers to prevent betting businesses from setting up in their areas.

UK Parliament: Dawn Butler
An element to consider here is rent and expenses, with retail betting firms often setting up shop in areas with the lowest rental costs. This does mean, however, that more disadvantaged areas often see the most betting shops, something reform campaigners and other public figures believe is predatory.

In Butler’s case, the MP highlighted the widespread social harm caused by gambling, describing it as a public health crisis, and urged for changes to these planning laws that enable gambling operators to target ‘vulnerable’ and ‘disadvantaged communities’.

A clash of opinion
In contrast, fellow Labour MP Richard Baker has recently underlined the importance of the UK’s regulated betting industry, describing it as a key contributor to local economies, public services and grassroots sport.

Speaking about his constituency of Glenrothes and Mid Fife in an op-ed for Politics Home, Baker highlighted the role betting shops play in sustaining high street footfall and creating jobs.

He said that modern betting shops support towns that have seen years of economic pressure, asserting: “Every job matters.”

Baker also emphasised the sector’s broader economic impact, pointing to its £6.8bn annual contribution to the UK economy, £4bn in tax revenues, and 109,000 jobs across the country.

He noted the deep ties between betting and sport, with regulated operators investing at every level. Both of these arguments are long-running, having been made by the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) on countless occasions over recent years amid an extensive debate on UK betting regulation.

Meanwhile, whilst acknowledging the harm caused by unregulated gambling, Baker warned against over-regulation that could drive consumers toward the black market.

He also added: “As a Labour MP, I want a tax regime that is fair, progressive and economically sound – one that protects the public, supports jobs, and rewards responsibility. More than ever, we need businesses that are investing and contributing.”

Is it really a problem?
As Butler said, Brent East already has more than 100 gambling premises, but could this be an anomaly?

The UK’s retail betting sector has undergone significant changes over the past decade, driven by regulatory updates, shifting consumer habits, the growth of online gambling and COVID-19.

From a peak of around 9,100 shops in 2013, the number of UK betting shops had fallen to approximately 5,995 by March 2023 – a 34% decline.

Much of this downturn followed the government’s decision in 2019 to reduce maximum stakes on fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) from £100 to £2.

Major operators responded swiftly such as William Hill which closed around 700 shops, Ladbrokes/Coral planned up to 900 closures, and Betfred projected 500 shop closures – collectively threatening over 10,000 jobs across the industry.

In 2020, the pandemic meant the sector saw additional closures, with William Hill confirming a further 119 shops would not reopen due to permanent declines in footfall. That year also saw Betfred close approximately 59 shops.

Despite the contraction, the sector remains a key employer in many local areas. However, its share of total sports betting revenue continues to shrink, with the online channel now dominating the market.

Tax reform looms
As political debate around gambling intensifies, the industry now faces fresh uncertainty over potential tax changes.

The Labour Treasury’s consultation on betting taxation closed on 21 July, and while no official recommendations have been published, reports suggest that significant reforms are pending.

Among the proposals, figures like Labour MP Alex Ballinger are pushing for the introduction of a single unified gambling tax, combining Remote Gaming Duty, General Betting Duty and Pool Betting Duty into one rate.

Supporters argue this would simplify the system and provide clarity for operators, while critics warn it could increase costs, threaten jobs and impact vital funding for sport and safer gambling initiatives.

With Chancellor Rachel Reeves under pressure to boost public finances, the industry is bracing for a move that could shape the future of the betting sector for years to come.

Fresh inquiries
Meanwhile, last month the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Gambling Reform has launched a new inquiry, led by Conservative MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith, to examine the future of gambling regulation in the country.

The inquiry aims to address gaps in the Government’s Gambling Act White Paper, focusing on stronger online protections, stricter advertising rules, and increased local authority powers.

Smith, a critic of current betting enforcement and ads, has emphasised the need for a regulatory framework fit for the digital age – something the Gambling Act review White Paper aimed to achieve, but many reform advocates feel did not.

Read more

Opinion: Poland calls on EU to tighten noose on illegal gambling payments

Justyna Grusza-Głębicka
Dr Justyna Grusza-Głębicka reports that Poland has initiated a direct fight against grey market gambling payments. In full swing, consequences could be felt beyond Polish borders as stakeholders will likely demand the EU intervene on facilitating illicit payments…

Battleground drawn
Since 2017, Poland has enforced legislation prohibiting payment service providers (PSPs) from facilitating transactions for websites blacklisted in the country’s Register of Domains Used to Offer Gambling in Violation of the Law. PSPs are required to block such services within 30 days of a domain being listed. In practice, however, enforcement has been inconsistent and the grey market for online gambling has flourished.

Now, Polish regulators are stepping up their efforts. Authorities have turned their focus to the financial intermediaries that continue to process transactions for offshore gambling operators, despite legal prohibitions. The target is clear: the estimated 41% of the market that remains outside the state’s regulatory reach.

Poland operates a monopoly on online casino operations, granted exclusively to Totalizator Sportowy, a state-owned entity. But this monopoly has been persistently undermined by unauthorised operators, many of whom find willing partners among payment institutions that, knowingly or otherwise, enable funds to flow across national and regulatory boundaries.

Coordinated actions
The matter took centre stage at the European Financial Congress, held in Sopot in June, during which the financial sector and the grey area of gambling were discussed.

Participants included Beata Stelmach, CEO of Totalizator Sportowy; Maciej Akimow, CEO of iGaming Dragon; Tadeusz Białek, representing the Polish Bank Association; Adam Lamentowicz, an executive at Superbet Group and President of the Polish Chamber of Entertainment and Betting Industry; Marcin Mikołajczyk, representing the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF); and Jerzy Mroczek. associated with the BLIK mobile payments system.

The creation of a dedicated task force was proposed, with the aim of combating the transfer of funds to illegal operators.

The declarations made at the Congress quickly found real-world resonance. A discussion broke out on LinkedIn noting that the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) had sent letters to payments companies, stating that it had identified the involvement of certain PSPs of offering payment services related to online gambling in Poland without the required licenses, with some PSPs cooperating with others.

The authority expects payment providers to immediately verify their operations in this context and comply with Poland’s Gambling Act by ceasing to provide such services.

Deep consequences
This is an important message for all entities involved in the payments market. It is worth noting that not every entity technically enabling payments has the status of a payment institution. However, even without such status, it may still be held liable. This includes not only administrative liability but also potential criminal or fiscal-criminal responsibility.

Put simply, payment providers, whether complicit or merely inattentive, can be viewed as “enablers of a shadow economy”. Though Poland is now moving assertively, its experience mirrors that of many EU member states struggling to contain grey-market gambling without a harmonised legal framework.

Spotlight on Brussels
There are currently no unified EU-level regulations concerning gambling apart from a few specific provisions applicable across all Member States – at least for now.

However, there is a clear trend towards harmonisation in the financial regulatory space. The gambling sector has found ways to operate underground and has embraced cryptocurrencies.

Still, we now have the MiCA Regulation (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), which introduces harmonised EU-wide rules on crypto-assets, specific requirements for entities operating in this space, and applicable AML procedures.

Whether this signals a more coordinated European approach to gambling oversight remains to be seen. But the message from Warsaw is unmistakable: those facilitating illegal gambling whether operators, affiliates, or financial intermediaries will no longer be given a pass.

_______________________________

Author Bio: Dr Justyna Grusza-Głębicka is a lawyer and expert in gambling law in Poland. She holds a Doctor of Laws degree, with her doctoral dissertation focused on the issue of state monopoly in the gambling sector. She runs her own law firm, specializing in gambling law, compliance-related matters, particularly anti-money laundering (AML), audits, legal opinions, and obtaining licenses for gambling operators.

Dr Grusza-Głębicka is an active participant in academic conferences and the author of numerous publications, both scholarly and industry-oriented. In 2024, she was nominated for the prestigious Rising Stars – Lawyers of Tomorrow award, organized by Wolters Kluwer.

Read more

Supreme Court of India evaluates blanket ban on online games

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking a ban on online betting apps has forced India’s Supreme Court into talks with the likes of Google and Apple.

Dr K.A. Paul, the individual who filed the litigation, did so with the goal of safeguarding Indian youth and vulnerable people from unregulated online gambling.

Betting and gaming products are being ‘disguised as fantasy sports and skill-based games”, Paul and the other litigation issuers noted in their reasoning.

Within the PIL, there’s two high-profile cases referred to where online betting has led to some nefarious results.

The first involves 25 celebrities, including Bollywood actors, cricketers and influencers, allegedly promoting betting apps in a covert matter earlier in March, with the investigation still ongoing.

The second takes notice of a news article from the state of Telangana, where it’s said that 24 people took their lives as a result of debts incurred from online betting.

Paul and others are urging for the introduction of a uniform legislation for the regulation of online betting “in the name of the larger public interest to safeguard the youth of India from the unregulated, exploitative, and dangerous online betting industry operating under the garb of fantasy sports and skill-based gaming”.

Supreme Court Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi have now begun consultations on the matter with the Reserve Bank of India, the Enforcement Directorate, and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India.

Private entities with interests in the fantasy sports and online betting scene have also been contacted, such as app store monopolists Google and Apple, as well as major game platforms like A23 Games, Dream11, and Mobile Premier League.

The plea comes at a time when Google is considering relaxing its Real Money Games (RMG) policies for its India Play Store after initial plans to do so were put on hold last year – with the core reason being that India lacks a centralised regulatory framework for gambling.

In another recent development, though it is unclear whether it’s connected to the above, the Enforcement Directorate of India has summoned Google representatives to a hearing related to a suspected case of money laundering through online betting apps listed on the Play Store.

As it stands only three Indian states have regulated online gaming markets, Goa, Daman, and Sikkim. There were murmurs that another state, Karnataka, may launch a mixed market, but it appears that the state government’s ideal regulatory framework would only cover fantasy sports and some ‘games of skill’ like rummy, omitting and essentially banning online sports betting.

September 15 will see SBC organise a groundbreaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more

Sportradar powers BETesporte’s responsible gambling push with AI

In a significant move for the company’s ambitions in Brazil’s newly regulated betting market, Sportradar has partnered with BETesporte to implement Bettor Sense.

Bettor Sense has been described as an AI-powered, personalised solution that is designed to detect early signs of gambling-related risk.

BETesporte becomes the first operator in Brazil to adopt the platform as the firm looks to reinforce its commitment to more transparent betting whilst the country continues to embrace its new sector.

Tom Mace, SVP of Integrity and Regulatory Services, Product and Strategy at Sportradar, said: “This partnership with BETesporte marks an important milestone for Sportradar’s ongoing mission to help shape secure and sustainable sports betting and iGaming industries.

“BETesporte is taking a proactive step in embracing responsible gaming as a core part of its business. We are confident this will be the first of many partnerships, as the market increasingly recognises the value of using data and technology to protect end users and strengthen compliance.”

The agreement also sees BETesporte join Sportradar’s Integrity Exchange, a global information-sharing network with the aim of combating betting-related corruption and match-fixing.

“Sportradar’s advanced technology enables us to anticipate and prevent risky behaviour, ensuring our bettors have the best possible experience with complete safety,” added Marcos Pereira, CEO of BETesporte.

“We will continue working tirelessly to protect the integrity of sport and the trust of our users, which remains our top priority.”

AI’s growing impact
Bettor Sense utilises AI and behavioural research to provide personalised interventions that help operators identify and support players exhibiting risky behaviour, before problems escalate.

This proactive approach marks a shift from traditional reactive responsible gambling measures, giving operators a tool to promote player safety and meet the increasing regulatory demands in the region.

The move sees Sportradar eying further opportunities to expand its reach into other parts of the sector other than just sportstech. As markets worldwide strengthen responsible gambling requirements, AI-driven tools like Bettor Sense are becoming increasingly popular for carrying out compliance tasks.

Read more

Tipico maintains low levels of gambling harm in 2024 ESG report

Tipico has placed problem gambling and player protection at the forefront of its 2024 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) report, published this week.

According to the figures, the company kept turnover from potentially problematic gambling behaviour below 1.5% for the full year. This figure includes activity from customers who would later self-exclude or be excluded before protective interventions were triggered.

Tipico says maintaining the share below this metric reflects the effectiveness of its early detection systems and is a ‘central focus’ in its broader responsible gambling strategy.

Axel Hefer, CEO of Tipico, stated: “This ESG report reflects our commitment to long-term value creation for all stakeholders, and it shows that growth and responsibility go hand in hand at Tipico. We are very proud of the progress we’ve made in 2024 – the year of the UEFA Euro.”

Meanwhile, the company launched its first nationwide responsible gambling television campaign in 2024, which reached more than four million viewers via sports broadcasts and online platforms.

The campaign formed part of a broader approach that includes continued funding for research, access to treatment programmes, as well as external evaluations of the company’s player protection practices.

SG – a vital ingredient
While problem gambling continues to attract attention across Europe, Tipico’s report positions harm prevention and data-driven intervention as essential components of its operating model.

The group’s focus on problem gambling prevention comes amid a wider debate about player protection in Germany. Operators, represented by the DWSV trade body, argue that the best way to protect players is by preventing them from exposure to the black market, but the GGL regulator believes that licensed firms need to take more responsibility.

“Our ESG strategy is about building a sustainable, forward-looking organisation that puts people first and sets consumer protection, integrity and our people at the core of all our operations,” added Christian Wurzinger, Tipico’s CFO.

“Our achievements in responsible gaming and the ongoing development of our teams are a strong testament to this commitment.”

Elsewhere in the report, the company outlined developments in employee training and environmental sustainability. Tipico delivered over 15,000 hours of training in 2024, with an emphasis on leadership and career development across its workforce.

The company also stated it is on track to meet its target of carbon neutrality by 2030. In 2024, it reduced Scope 2 CO₂e emissions by 41% year-on-year and introduced office-wide recycling initiatives. These changes contributed to the company achieving ISO 14001 environmental certification in 2025.

Global push for safety
Tipico isn’t the only gambling operator to see the importance of sustainability in gambling, particularly amid widespread public and political concerns across various European markets

Back In February 2021, Swedish firm Kindred (now owned by French firm FDJ United) launched a sustainability campaign titled ‘Journey to Zero’ to eliminate harmful gambling revenue. It looked to reduce the share of gross winnings revenue generated from high‑risk players to 0%.

Kindred has gradually made progress toward its aim, and by the third quarter of 2023, revenue from high‑risk players had reduced to 3.1%, up from around 3.3% in Q3 2023, with an improvement rate of 87.4% in customer behaviour after interventions

Other markets like the UK, meanwhile, continue to see extensive charity initiatives, now funded by a mandatory statutory levy paid by licenced UK operators, a requirement of the 2005 Gambling Act review White Paper.

A recent development saw training from the Young Gamers and Gamblers Education Trust (YGAM) deliver strong results in helping Health and Social Care practitioners spot and respond to gambling and gaming harms in young people, according to an evaluation by Rocket Science.

The report found that after completing the training, practitioners were 72% better at identifying harmful behaviours. Their knowledge of gaming and gambling risks jumped from 14.8% to 95.1%.

Confidence levels also rose sharply, with a 91.9% increase in their ability to talk to young people about these issues, and a 92.8% improvement in providing support and guidance.

September 15 will see SBC organise a ground breaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more

Erdogan’s top lieutenant questions Turkey’s fight on illegal gambling 

Turkish authorities praised progress on campaigns and initiatives to tackle social harms and improve public health at the annual meeting of the High Council for Combatting Addiction.

Chaired by Vice President Cevdet Yılmaz at the Presidential Complex, authorities detailed progress in implementing 88 of 91 directives proposed in 2019 by the Ministry of the Interior and public health organisation YEŞİLAY (Green Crescent).

The session highlighted Turkey’s strengthened multi-institutional efforts across a broad range of addiction-related challenges to map drug prevention, smoking cessation, alcohol control, and digital safety.

Ministries presented data-backed updates on ongoing work: expanded rehabilitation facilities, increased cessation clinics, educational programmes in schools, and reinforced customs surveillance to combat narcotics smuggling.

For a government that has been grappling with economic strain and political unrest, the High Council offered a moment of policy coherence.

The Erdogan administration has been focused on addiction prevention for some time, and the issue has received structured, multi-agency attention.

Under Yılmaz’s stewardship, ministries have aligned prevention, enforcement, and education efforts with an eye toward long-term social stability.

But beneath the polished progress report lay a conspicuous omission: virtual gambling (“sanal bahis”), a fast-expanding sector that the government has done little to contain.

Yılmaz, who is viewed as President Erdoğan’s strict taskmaster having overseen policing, addiction programs, economic reform agendas, and development planning. He conceded that the government has no meaningful picture of gambling addiction in Turkey, despite its growing social and economic toll.

The reason for this blind spot is political as much as institutional. Illicit online gambling thrives in the gaps between financial technology, enforcement apathy, and political convenience. While law enforcement has made strides in dismantling drug networks, gambling remains a topic few in Ankara are willing to broach with urgency.

The AK government has called on federal police and intelligence agencies to draw up a national action plan. But few believe such a plan will reach the top of the government’s priority list. The issue, long aired by Ali Babacan, a former AK Party minister turned opposition leader, implicates individuals and networks with ties to Erdoğan’s inner circle.

Doubts persist about whether the ruling party has the political appetite to pursue a crackdown that might expose uncomfortable affiliations — or worse, unseat sources of informal revenue.

The unease deepened with the recent arrest of Ahmed Faruk Karslı, CEO of Istanbul-based fintech app Papara in May – a business once regarded as “Turkey’s Fintech Unicorn”.

Karslı was detained by Police Intelligence on charges of corruption, following revelations that Papara facilitated over 26,000 accounts for illegal betting transactions, worth a staggering ₺12.9bn (around €340m).

The scandal underscores not only the scope of Turkey’s underground betting economy, but also the digital financial architecture that enables it.

The government’s silence on Papara, beyond routine legal proceedings has raised eyebrows. As fintech expands and mobile payments surge, regulators seem reluctant to confront the platforms that blur the line between convenience and criminality.

The timing is awkward. President Erdoğan’s approval ratings are at their lowest in years, following a wave of political arrests in Istanbul this May.

In response, long fragmented opposition parties have found new momentum to attack Erdoğan’s regime, yet will not form a majority in Parliament to trigger a snap election, as was assumed following protests and strikes in May.

Erdoğan’s conservative image has long rested on moral authority: anti-drug, pro-family, socially traditional. Yet gambling, especially when enabled by financial actors with AK Party links, threatens to puncture that narrative.

If Yılmaz’s remarks were intended as a warning shot, they may also be a signal of internal rifts within the administration—between technocrats who see the policy gap and party loyalists unwilling to fill it.

Yılmaz posed a simple question at the council’s close: “Should we impose safeguards against gambling as we have for other digital threats?”

It is a question few in Turkey’s ruling elite have dared ask. But if the government wishes to retain control of the national narrative on addiction, the time for political caution may be over.

Online gambling is not just a vice; it is a systemic risk—one that straddles public health, criminal finance, and political integrity. Leaving it unaddressed may not only jeopardize social stability. It may also cost the government its last claims to moral leadership.

Read more

GAMSTOP says problem gambling awareness is high

GAMSTOP has highlighted that people in the UK have a generally high knowledge of problem gambling tools at their disposal.

This was noted in the self-exclusion scheme’s latest report on registration activity, which showed more than 600,000 registrations and around 525,000 active self-exclusions from online gambling in the UK. In total, this constituted a growth of 100,000 registrants over the last 11 months.

“Such unprecedented growth in registrations indicates a widespread need for self-exclusion and highlights the crucial role of the gambling harm prevention, education, treatment and support sector,” GAMSTOP wrote on social media.

“We are proud to have formed strong, collaborative relationships with a wide range of organisations to help ensure that we provide signposting to a robust network of support to our service users.”

GAMSTOP further reminded that it will soon start only using active exclusions as a metric as outdated user account information will gradually be archived starting 25 October.

That way, people whose minimum exclusion period expired more than seven years ago will have their personal data stored separately from more fresh data. In comparison, active exclusions will serve as a more accurate representation of problem gambling in the UK, with the current figures of over half a million representing 1% of the adult population.

Generally considered to have one of the best responsible gambling frameworks in Europe, the UK is currently gearing up to implement even more policies to make play safer.

Back in 2023, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) – based on recommendations from the Gambling Act Review White Paper – announced the NHS as the sole commissioner of an annual £100m Research, Education, and Treatment (RET) levy funding, paid by UK operators.

Developed in conjunction with the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) to serve as treatment support commissioner, the levy will ensure that the entire UK problem gambling support network will be operated outside of any influence from the gambling sector.

GambleAware, a charity that served as the previous commissioner of voluntary RET donations, has announced that it will close down by March 2026.

September 15 will see SBC organise a ground breaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more