Trinidad and Tobago set for major shift on gambling policy

A Bill proposing sweeping social reforms is set to be presented to Trinidad and Tobago’s Parliament, as new Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar delivers on key campaign pledges targeting youth welfare and broader public health objectives.

“As promised by Kamla” the UNC Party is committed to raising the legal drinking age to 21, while gambling and cannabis use would be restricted to those aged 25. The reforms mark a major policy shift, to position Trinidad and Tobago as the strictest Caribbean state on adult activities.

Persad-Bissessar unveiled the measures during her first official address since her general election victory on 28 April, reaffirming the UNC Party’s ambitions and promising “tough decisions” to bring long-term stability and fairness.

The reforms are being bundled into a wider legislative manifest that also includes a review of pension tax laws. The Prime Minister pledged to exempt retirement benefits from taxation for individuals over 60, arguing that taxing pensions after decades of contribution amounts to double taxation and imposes undue strain on seniors with fixed incomes.

“These changes are about fairness, safety, and building a healthier future. You don’t want the next five years to be as terrible as the last ten,” she told supporters during a UNC meeting in Penal.

Cautious Support from Business Community

The proposal has received early backing from three major business chambers, including the Greater San Fernando Area Chamber of Commerce (GSFCC), whose president Kiran Singh praised the government’s focus on addiction prevention and urged it to go further by restricting vaping among minors.

Singh downplayed concerns about potential losses to nightlife and gaming industries, stating that the societal benefits would outweigh economic costs, and noted that most youth spending in these sectors is marginal or reliant on borrowed money.

However, Chaguanas Chamber of Industry and Commerce (CCIC) president Baldath Maharaj urged greater consultation, warning that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in tourism, hospitality, and entertainment could face setbacks during an already fragile post-pandemic recovery. He recommended a phased implementation strategy, backed by education campaigns and support measures for affected businesses.

The Fyzabad Chamber of Commerce also welcomed the intent but called for a balanced approach, citing concerns that the age increase may inadvertently hurt local businesses that cater to younger demographics. Its president, Anjie Jairam, emphasised the need for evidence-based policymaking and engagement with both the private sector and youth groups.

In Parliament Opposition to Kamla plans, have cautioned that stringent age restrictions—particularly if applied to nightlife, casinos, and recreational venues—could deter western visitors, opting for neighbouring Caribbean destinations perceived as more permissive

Unfinished Oversight of Gambling

While the government seeks to raise the legal gambling age, Trinidad and Tobago has yet to fully implement its 2021 Gambling (Gaming and Betting) Control Act. Though passed and partially proclaimed, the Act’s full regulatory framework including licensing, inspections, and enforcement remains inactive, in need of a final proclamation.

The law would establish a dedicated Gambling Control Commission to oversee five casino venues and 80 gambling/betting establishments (public and private) operating in Trinidad and Tobago

In parallel, the Financial Intelligence Unit of Trinidad and Tobago (FIUTT) has stepped up enforcement in the gambling sector to combat money laundering and financial crime. In 2024, it held multiple stakeholder engagement sessions and public consultations, and collaborated with the EU Global Facility on AML/CFT to align the sector with international standards.

The FIUTT has become a key actor in bridging the regulatory vacuum while the 2021 Act awaits full implementation, with increased scrutiny on unregulated gambling environments and risk-based supervision.

The proposed social reform Bill is expected to be introduced in Parliament in the upcoming session, yet the new government has made no statement on the proclamation of the Gambling Control Act.

Read more

Safe Bet Show: Jennifer Shatley of ROGA on player wellbeing, prevention and the future of RG

In this episode of Martin Lycka’s Safe Bet Show, we sit down with Dr. Jennifer Shatley, Executive Director of Roga (Responsible Online Gaming Association), for a conversation on the future of responsible gaming. With a unique academic background—especially her communications degree rooted in research and statistics—Dr. Shatley brings a data-driven mindset to her work. She…

Read more

Meta updates ad rules for real money and social gaming

Meta is changing its vetting process for online gambling ads on several platforms.

The tech conglomerate implemented new advertising rules for gambling-related marketing materials shared on its Facebook and Instagram social platforms. Meta adjusted its advertising rules to combat the prevalence of ads shared by illegal and unlicensed gaming operators. Meta defines online gambling and gaming as “any product or service where anything of monetary value is included as part of a method of entry and prize.”

Its definition applies to online sports betting, online casinos, poker and lotteries.

The company’s new advertising standards mandate entities that want to run a gambling ad to request authorization through Meta’s Permissions and Verifications portal offered through its Business Suite offering. Meta requires licensed advertisers to select whether they are an operator, aggregator or affiliate and the territories where they want to share ads.

All gambling ads shared through Meta’s platf..

Read more

Former MGC General Counsel Todd Grossman joins PrizePicks

A former gaming regulator is joining PrizePicks as fantasy operators across the country deal with legality concerns in one of the largest markets in America.

PrizePicks announced the appointment of Todd Grossman as the company’s Director of Gaming Regulatory Compliance to ensure the fantasy giant meets legal and compliance standards as it expands across North America. Grossman joins PrizePicks after spending more than 10 years in various roles at the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC).

“After an unforgettable chapter in public service, I’m thrilled to share that I’ve joined PrizePicks as Director of Gaming Regulatory Compliance,” said Grossman in a post on LinkedIn. “From day one, the welcome has been warm, the energy high, and the company’s commitment to building something truly exceptional has been unmistakable.”

At the MGC, he served as General Counsel for three years before being appointed as Interim Executive Director. Grossman was named interim director after Karen Wells st..

Read more

NJ Gov. Murphy signs bill banning betting partnerships with colleges

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy has signed a bill into law banning public colleges and universities across the state from securing deals with sports betting brands.

Assembly Bill 4113 was signed by Murphy on Tuesday after first being introduced by Assemblywoman Linda Carter and Assemblyman Benjie Wimberly last April. It was carried over into the current year’s session.

The legislation is the same as Senate Bill 2155, which was introduced in January 2024 by Sen. Joseph Cryan. SB 2155 was passed by the Senate Higher Education Committee with amendments in May before being substituted by A4113 last month.

The bill was filed despite there being no active partnerships between New Jersey public educational institutions and gambling brands.

Still, Murphy’s approval of A4113 now writes a formal ban into law. Colleges and universities may not sign a sports wagering partnership that provides a gambling brand or operator with “access to advertise in the institution’s stadiums and other facilities…

Read more

Newsletter: Problem gambling is falling, isn’t it?

The UK Statistics Authority has warned the Department for Health and Social Care and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) about the misuse of suicide statistics. Disparities at the Office for Disparities: The statistics regulator also noted problems with the OHID report, which assumes:  Lies, damned lies etc: The issue of the misuse…

Read more

Paddy Power Betfair attack shows extent and boldness of UK cybercrime

Flutter Entertainment confirmed yesterday (8 July) that its Paddy Power and Betfair UK brands had been subject to a heavy cyber attack.

The respective sportsbook and betting exchange brands were targeted by cyber criminals who were able to access information like emails and account names.

It is understood that a significant number of customer accounts were targeted. However, Flutter stated that serious information like passwords, ID documents and payment details, were not accessed by the cyber attackers.

“We can confirm that our Paddy Power and Betfair businesses have suffered a data incident involving personal information for some of our customers,” a Flutter statement provided to SBC News read.

“Immediately upon becoming aware of this incident, we informed relevant regulators and authorities and initiated a full investigation, supported by external IT security experts, to understand what happened and how we can better protect our networks and customers.

“The unauthorised access has been removed and the incident contained. Our investigation concluded that the affected information was isolated to limited betting account information. No passwords, ID documents or usable card or payment details were impacted. We are informing all affected customers.

“Safeguarding and securing our customers’ information is of the utmost importance to us.”

The incident highlights the extent of cybercrime threats to online-focused businesses, with a huge range of companies subject to attacks over the past year, not just those in the gambling sector.

The British government’s Cyber Security Breaches Survey for 2025, for example, found that 43% of UK businesses reported a cyber security breach or attack in the past year – showing that Paddy Power and Betfair’s recent issue is hardly uncommon.

For companies like Flutter, which has access to one of the best tech stacks the industry has to offer as well as other important aspects like legal counsel, overcoming cyber security issues is a challenge – but not an enormous one.

For the many SMEs which make up both the B2C and B2B pillars of the betting industry, cyber issues may present more of a challenge.

According to a study conducted by Umazi, a digital ID platform, which was released the same day as the attack on Flutter, SMEs are the biggest victims of cyber criminality. The firm’s study found that 70% of SMEs are worried that business identity information and other data could be stolen.

“This isn’t a digital economy, it’s a digital illusion,” said Cindy van Niekerk, CEO and Founder of Umazi. “While regulators and corporates applaud innovation, SMEs are being left behind with legacy processes that actively undermine cybersecurity and economic growth.”

The British government, which is acutely aware of how big a contribution financial services make to its economy, has attempted to clamp down on cyber crime through legislation, such as the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act.

These measures will provide some support to betting and gaming firms as much as any other digital business. However, the attacks against Flutter, one of the biggest betting firms in the world, showcases the boldness of cyber criminals and the extent of the threat faced by businesses large and small.

Read more

NHS psychiatric morbidity survey reveals low rate of problem gambling and gambling participation

The Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS) has published trends and insights on mental health and common disorders impacting the treatment of adults in the UK.

Commissioned by NHS England and Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) the study provides insights and the prevalence of the UK’s nine most common mental health disorders including, depression, bipolar, psychosis, ADHD, OCD, trauma, phobias, drug addiction and problem gambling.

Among these, the APMS sheds new light on problem gambling—not as a standalone behavioural issue but as one frequently linked with deeper mental health challenges. Based on structured clinical interviews and a nationally representative sample, the survey finds that just 0.3% of adults in England meet the clinical threshold for problem gambling, with 0.9% of those who gambled in the past year affected.

This figure sits far below the 2.5% prevalence rate cited by the Gambling Commission’s Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB) in 2023. That contrast has sparked debate over statistical rigour.

Gambling advisory Regulus Partners, has criticised the Commission’s handling of gambling regulation, argues that the GSGB “remains an outlier when compared to all other official statistics on the prevalence of harmful gambling stretching back almost two decades.”

The APMS, in contrast, offers a clinical, methodologically transparent account. Its true value lies not in prevalence comparisons, but in its analysis of comorbidity: the strong and consistent overlap between problem gambling and psychiatric disorders.

Mental Health applies across all data

Problem gambling in the APMS is revealed to be tightly interwoven with mental ill-health. Adults identified as problem gamblers were substantially more likely to report symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, OCD, and suicidal thoughts or behaviours. They were also more likely to experience problem debt, unemployment, domestic violence, or trauma.

“Problem gambling, although rare, is consistently associated with a greater burden of psychological, financial and social distress,” the report concludes.

The survey also shows that problem gamblers are more likely to be receiving counselling or psychiatric medication, suggesting that they are already visible within the health system—but perhaps not always recognised through the lens of gambling-related harm.

Sharper focus on shrinking base…
Interestingly, the APMS also finds that gambling participation in the UK is declining. In 2023/24, only 43% of adults reported gambling in the previous year—down from 66% in 2007. While public discourse often implies a growing epidemic, these figures point to a contraction of gambling participation, not its expansion.

This long-term trend undermines claims of gambling “normalisation.”

The implication is not that gambling has ceased to pose a public health risk. Rather, as fewer people gamble, harm may become more concentrated among a smaller, more vulnerable population—often overlapping with those already experiencing mental health challenges.

Framing the evidence
Much of the friction between APMS and GSGB findings can be explained by methodology. The APMS relies on face-to-face household interviews and clinically validated tools, providing a more stable basis for tracking trends over time.

The GSGB, by contrast, uses online self-completed questionnaires, which are cheaper to run but more prone to response bias. That does not invalidate either approach—but it does caution against treating all figures as equally reliable.

Problem Gambling Prevalence: APMS vs GSGB vs HSE (2018)
A comparative graphic that illustrates how survey design can shape outcomes.

Policy must be grounded in evidence
The APMS issues a stern warning: problem gambling is a mental health concern first, and a regulatory issue second. On that basis, it points—indirectly but firmly—to two policy priorities:

Mainstream gambling screening in mental health services
Practitioners in NHS mental health and primary care should routinely assess for gambling harm—particularly among patients presenting with depression, anxiety, trauma, or financial distress.
Focus interventions on high-risk groups
Public health strategies should prioritise the small subset of individuals at highest risk, rather than applying generalised restrictions. This includes tailoring support across healthcare, addiction services, and financial counselling.

The APMS confirms that problem gambling is not a widespread epidemic, but for a narrow group of individuals, it is profoundly damaging. Recognising this comorbidity with mental illness is the first step toward targeted, effective policy. As the availability of rigorous national surveys shrinks, the clarity offered by this one should not be wasted.

Read more

SBOTOP owner handed £3.9m penalty by Isle of Man regulator

Celton Manx, the parent company of SBOTOP, has been hit with a £3,937,500 penalty from the Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission (GSC) for anti-money laundering (AML) failures.

The GSC found that the company lacked evidence of proper risk assessments, ongoing customer monitoring, enhanced due diligence and sufficient identity verification procedures, as well as falling short when it comes to handling suspicious activity.

The regulator noted that the original penalty was £5,625.000, however, it was discounted by 30% after the company undertook “comprehensive remediation” to address the identified issues.

A GSC statement read: “The Commission is satisfied that the imposition of the Civil Penalty on Celton Manx reflects the serious nature of the identified non-compliance and the issues and risks identified.

“It was further noted that Celton Manx acknowledged the serious shortcomings in its operational and governance arrangements at an early stage of the Commission’s investigation and thereupon had entered into settlement discussions with the Commission and sought to resolve matters expeditiously.”

TGP Europe exits the UK

Celton Manx held an Isle of Man licence from August 2008 until surrendering it on 9 May 2025, a decision that was part of a wider exit of the UK by the Isle of Man-based TGP Europe.

Prior to its departure, TGP Europe operated SBOTOP in the UK via a white label agreement with Celton Manx, as well as operated the UK domain names of several Asia-focused brands, such as DEBET.

However, the platforms associated with TGP Europe ceased their UK operations after the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) uncovered significant AML failures by TGP. The company was handed a £3m penalty by the UKGC following its investigation.

John Pierce, UKGC Head of Enforcement, commented at the time of TGP’s exit: “This case involves a gambling company that was unwilling or unable to meet the regulatory standards we expect from our licensees. It is right that they have now exited the British market.

“Following TGP’s exit, several online gambling operators can no longer lawfully offer gambling facilities to consumers located in Great Britain. These sites, previously operating under TGP’s licence, may not provide adequate protection against criminal activity or gambling-related harm and should not be available to GB consumers with immediate effect.”

Criminal infiltration

Financial crime is an ongoing concern for the Isle of Man given its established financial sector and links to the UK, and it is often the destination for operators seeking regulatory approval.

However, media reports claim that the crown dependency has been subject to attacks by criminals to bypass its controls against financial crime and immigration.

As a result, the Isle of Man’s government has warned that there is “limited appetite” for iGaming businesses with links to East or Southeast Asia.

This sentiment was revealed upon the publication of Digital Isle of Man’s National Risk Appetite Statement (NRAS), a document that seeks to outline the attitude towards new and current iGaming business relationships on the island and identify risk factors.

Although entities are not expressly prohibited from engaging with what are considered higher-risk jurisdictions, they must implement enhanced measures to manage the risks effectively.

In addition, if there is an accumulation of identifiable risk factors, regulators “will not authorise new business, and will review the terms of any existing licences, on the basis of this being outside of the national risk appetite for the Isle of Man”.

According to the report, iGaming contributes 16% of the Isle of Man’s GDP and provides over 1,000 jobs.

Read more

UKGC puts frictionless financial checks at the heart of safer gambling strategy

The UKGC seems as confident as ever in how it has crafted one of the key measures of the UK Gambling Act review, emphasising that financial vulnerability checks are turning out to be as “straightforward as possible”.

Last week, Helen Rhodes, who is the Commission’s current Director of Major Policy Projects, gave a speech which set out a more refined, data-led vision for player safety, including an update on what has been learned from the pilot of financial checks.

In August last year, the UKGC began rolling out what it calls ‘light-touch’ vulnerability checks using publicly available data. These checks were a key measure of the Gambling Act review, seen as a means to protect customers against potentially unsustainable gambling spending.

Initially set at a threshold of £500 in net deposits over a 30-day rolling period, the limit was lowered to £150 from February 2025. These checks were designed to operate with what the UKGC described as “minimal friction”, something betting stakeholders have been adamant is an absolute necessity.

During stage one of the pilot, around 95% of financial vulnerability assessments were completed what the UKGC described as frictionlessly, which then rose to 97% in stage two. These figures exceed the 80% frictionless completion rate estimated in the 2023 Government White Paper.

Black market concerns
The news comes in the midst of industry demands to see greater consistency when it comes to financial risk checks. Concerns that these checks could turn more gamblers towards black market betting if not carried out in a frictionless and simple manner are long-running, dating back to the initial conversation around affordability during the 2020-2023 review of UK gambling regulation.

BGC CEO Grainne Hurst recently explained on SBC’s Safe Bet Show podcast that obstacles such as this wouldn’t see customers stop using the products they like, they’ll just decide to stop using the products they like in the regulated sphere, and they’ll go elsewhere to get those products.

She added: “In the black market, where there’s no regulation, they pay no tax, there’s no player protection whatsoever.”

Meanwhile, the UKGC has previously reiterated that finance risk checks’ should not be considered ‘affordability checks’.

In May, the Commission explained: “Financial risk assessments would be a much more targeted way of identifying potentially financially vulnerable customers. They would not affect a customer’s credit score if they were introduced in the future.”

A turning point?
What sets this new approach apart, Rhodes emphasised, is that it avoids blanket affordability checks. Rather than testing if every punter can afford their spending, the Commission’s model hones in on those who may already be financially at risk.

The goal is not to interfere with the vast majority of players who gamble safely, but to step in early where harm is most likely, the Director asserted.

In stage two of the recent pilot, around 3% of assessments could not be matched, improving on the 5% unmatched rate seen in stage one. Both percentages are significantly lower than the 20% rate without frictionless assessments predicted in the White Paper.

Having now moved into the analysis phase, the Financial Risk Assessments are designed to identify a specific group of customers: those who are not only spending large amounts, but also showing signs of worsening financial distress.

This can include red flags such as multiple arrears, defaults or evidence of bankruptcy.

Continuing her speech, Rhodes said: “The pilot findings represent a significant step forward, and our analysis phase will enable us to further explore how operators could embed assessments into their overall customer interaction approaches and how to reduce unnecessary inconsistency between credit reference agency reports.”

Looking ahead, the Commission is analysing how these financial checks can be embedded more smoothly into the customer journey.

Rhodes was keen to stress that the regulator remains open to industry feedback, mentioning that nearly 1,000 responses were submitted during the consultation.

By anchoring its reforms in financial vulnerability rather than broad affordability, the Commission is signalling a more balanced and targeted approach, making financial vulnerability checks no longer “an afterthought”.

Read more