ASA flags rare affiliate breach in Hollywoodbets ad ruling

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld a complaint against Hollywoodbets after one of its ads appeared on an esports stats site and was shown to a registered underage user.

What makes this case stand out is that the ad wasn’t placed directly by Hollywoodbets, but by an affiliate marketing partner, which marks one of the few recent rulings where an operator was found to be in breach due to the actions of an affiliate.

About the ad
The banner in question was spotted on www.the-VFL.com, the website of the Virtual Football League (VFL), an EA SPORTS FC esports platform.

Seen on 10 April 2025, the content promoted an offer of ‘UP TO £30 BACK AS FREE BETS + 20 FREE SPINS’ alongside images of athletes from various sports and a call-to-action button reading ‘SIGN HERE’.

It was seen by a 16-year-old user, who had entered their real date of birth when registering on the site. The ASA confirmed the user was logged in when the ad was served, initiating concerns about age-appropriate targeting.

The ad was delivered by Clever Advertising (Playhill Ltd), a third-party affiliate working with Hollywoodbets International UK Ltd.

In its response, Clever Advertising said it had assessed the site as suitable for gambling ads, arguing that VFL.com’s esports content – specifically 11v11 Pro Clubs gameplay – was generally targeted at older players.

The group also pointed to EA Sports FC demographic data suggesting that less than 25% of players were under 18. The ad had reportedly been approved to appear only before users logged in, not during logged-in sessions.

The verdict
Despite the arguments, the ASA upheld the complaint and found the ad had been served inappropriately. The watchdog ruled the ad breached several parts of the CAP Code, including rules designed to prevent gambling ads from being directed at under-18s.

Affiliate marketing plays a significant role in the UK gambling sector, but ASA rulings in recent years have largely focused on ads placed directly by operators.

Hollywoodbets has now confirmed that the ad had been placed by Clever Advertising and said it cooperated fully with the ASA. Meanwhile, The-VFL.com said it had no control over the specific ads served on its site and removed the promotion once the complaint was raised.

Social media crackdown
The ruling comes just a month after the ASA sided with Buzz Bingo following complaints about a Facebook ad, showing the extent of online advertising and the potential pitfalls that can come from this for operators.

The ASA received two complaints concerning a post from the Buzz Bingo Grimsby Facebook page in April, which used an action figure to promote its bingo offering.

The complainants raised concerns that the ad’s design, particularly the use of the action figure, could appeal to children and potentially encourage underage gambling.

Read more

SBC Summit preview: Midnite compliance VP Alex Henderson on the one crucial lesson UK bookmakers must learn

British betting is a highly valuable, highly regulated and highly competitive market, a holy trinity of factors that market newcomers like online sportsbook and casino Midnite are trying to take on in stride.

A recent regulatory upheaval, and with some politicians calling for yet another one, has left operators both large and small with a lot of compliance challenges on their plate. Midnite’s VP of Compliance, Alex Henderson, shares his perspective on the UK’s changing compliance dynamics, ahead of discussing this topic at the SBC Summit Lisbon.

As a relatively newcomer to UK betting, how has Midnite taken to the player protection focus that has dominated the market in recent years?

I have been at Midnite only a short time, and what I can say is that as a business, they genuinely put the customer first in everything they do. No decision is made without considering the customer. Protecting customers is key, Midnite wants to ensure that customers have a great experience, but more importantly, they want them to be safe.

How can smaller operators balance market growth ambitions, including advertising and player outreach, with the need to ensure players are protected to the fullest extent?

I would suggest that focusing on the consumer will help any business design products that will help achieve growth. Even if you look outside of gambling at businesses such as Monzo and Revolut. They started with a product designed to help customers, the growth was a consequence of building an excellent product.

How has the company learned from the lessons, and mistakes, of its contemporaries when it comes to player protection?

One thing that is great about our industry is that we all learn from and help each other, especially within compliance. In the UK specifically, the fact that the UKGC shares best practice and learnings from enforcement action is a fantastic tool for compliance professionals and gambling operators in general. I would say that the main lesson in player protection is a simple one, make your product and the environment safe and user friendly.

Is navigating the changing dynamics of player protection, with the Gambling Act review still being adopted, a challenge for a newcomer brand like yourselves?

Changing regulation and guidance is a challenge for all operators, not necessarily because of complexity, but because of the technical time and operational effort required to implement changes correctly. Beyond technical implementation, you also need to embed new processes, train teams, and monitor for effectiveness.

That said, when you operate in a regulated industry, you develop a certain level of agility. Newer brands, if anything, are often better positioned to adapt quickly. We’re not constrained by legacy systems or internal bureaucracy, which gives us the flexibility to build compliance into our processes from the ground up.

So while regulatory change always requires work, it’s something we expect, and we’ve designed our structure to be able to respond quickly and responsibly. I have witnessed this first hand at Midnite already, where a challenge is presented and the various experts throughout the organisation band together to find a swift and effective solution.

Is more cross-industry collaboration needed between large and small operators to ensure customers are not just jumping from site to site?

I think we’ve actually started to see some really solid progress in this area, especially at conferences and roundtables where the egos get left at the door and people genuinely want to solve things together.

There’s still more to do, of course, especially around things like data sharing and consistent standards, but the intent is there now in a way it maybe wasn’t a few years ago. The more we treat player protection as a shared responsibility, the harder it becomes for players to fall through the cracks.

Could the industry make more use of the huge amounts of player data that have been amassed by the largest and most well-established firms?

Oh absolutely, and not just to sell them another accumulator. Some of the big firms are sitting on data goldmines, but most of the time it gets used for marketing or risk, not protection.

There’s so much untapped potential to use that data for early intervention, better tooling, smarter limits. The tech exists. The question is whether we’re willing to share, standardise, and prioritise it for the right reasons. The good thing is, there are a lot of operators taking strides in the space, so are some external providers who have been raising the bar here.

What will SBC Summit attendees learn from your panel about the future of player protection in markets like the UK?

I don’t like sitting on panels and repeating the same messages from my industry peers. I would say that attendees’ learning will depend on two things… the questions I get asked on the day and then how open attendees are to different perspectives.

We’ll talk about what’s actually working, where the gaps still are, and how we move from theory to action. Expect honesty, a bit of healthy disagreement, and maybe even a few useful ideas you can nick for your own team.

SBC Summit will take place from 16–18 September at the Feira Internacional de Lisboa and MEO Arena, bringing together 30,000 industry stakeholders for an unmissable three-day experience.Looking to attend? Here’s how:

Secure your place with a VIP Event Pass – Enjoy full access to all conference sessions, the exhibition floor, exclusive networking events, and complimentary food and drink throughout the summit.

Bringing the team? Take advantage of our Group Pass Discount — purchase three or more VIP Event Passes and pay just €400 per ticket (saving €200 off the standard price).

Operator or affiliate? You may be eligible for a complimentary VIP Event Pass, which includes full access to the exhibition, conference, and exclusive networking events. Apply now to reserve your spot.

Expo+ Pass: Gain access to the full exhibition floor and all conference sessions across the three days. This does not include access to our exclusive VIP evening networking events.

Read more

YGAM training has highest impact for UK practitioners 

Training delivered by the Young Gamers and Gamblers Education Trust (YGAM) has achieved outstanding results in preparing Health and Social Care practitioners to detect gaming and gambling harms affecting children and young people, according to an evaluation conducted by consultancy Rocket Science.

The evaluation showed that practitioners developed a 72% greater ability to identify harmful behaviours after completing the training. Their knowledge of gaming and gambling risks increased from 14.8% to 95.1%. The evaluation also highlighted a 91.9% increase in practitioners’ confidence to speak with young people about these issues, and a 92.8% improvement in their ability to provide support and appropriate help.

In 2024, YGAM trained 1,957 professionals, who collectively reached an estimated 199,467 children and young people, surpassing delivery targets by 166%. Clinical teams at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital and frontline staff at the mental health charity Place2Be were among key partners in the training programme.

The evaluation also demonstrated strong knowledge retention, with 57.8% of participants maintaining high levels of understanding three months after training, rising to 75.0% after six months.

Sandy Thompson, who leads YGAM’s Social Care Programme, said the evaluation confirmed the charity’s evidence-based approach: “Our evidence-based methodology serves as the core foundation for all our activities. The evaluation shows our impact while reinforcing our dedication to reflection and continuous improvement.

“We have incorporated thorough evaluation procedures into all phases of programme delivery to ensure our work is both effective and responsive to the needs of healthcare practitioners and the young people they support.

“These findings have shaped our methods, guided our partnership development, and deepened our commitment to sustained growth. The evidence collected will serve as our foundation to expand our reach and create meaningful prevention outcomes for gaming and gambling harms.”

Rocket Science recommended that the programme be extended to reach more frontline professionals, integrated into safeguarding and mental health protocols, and supported by the development of specialised resources for different practitioner groups.

YGAM stands by legacy

Founded in 2014, Ygam’s vision is for “every child and young person to be resilient to and safeguarded against gaming and gambling harms.” The charity was established as a direct response to personal tragedy: after battling gambling addiction for over 25 years, Alan Lockhart died by suicide in 2010 at the age of 40.

In the aftermath, Alan’s mother Anne, a former teacher, joined forces with her husband Keith and co-founder Lee Willows to create Ygam. Together, they were determined to use education as a tool to prevent similar harm in future generations.

Read more

Nigeria set for domestic collision on gambling overhaul 

There have been significant objections raised in Nigeria as the central gaming bill passes its third reading and approaches completion.

The Federation of State Gaming Regulators (FSGRN) has vehemently objected to the bill and shared concerns over its progress, as the regulatory framework for the sector edges closer to change.

The Central Gaming Bill is looking to shift the current oversight of the National Lottery Act, which has been deemed unconstitutional. It would mean the building of a federal framework.

However, opposition to the bill from the FSGRN has highlighted that the bill would be a significant constitutional overreach, as well as a threat to destabilising the federal structure in Nigeria.

Warnings from the FSGRN underline that it could intrude on constitutional provisions and have a profoundly negative impact on the country’s gambling framework.

The bill would see the formation of a commission that would oversee the country’s gambling sector and governance of the industry.

Central to the incentives of the bill is to strangle illicit operations and boost efficiency within the licensing process.

The shift comes as the Nigerian gambling industry rides a wave of momentum in terms of engagement and traffic.

Driven by youth and fintech tapping into the gambling industry, it was recently predicted that Nigeria’s iGaming sector is set to grow by 16% and hit NGN $500m in revenue by the end of the year.

The Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority emphasised that this has been significantly accelerated by the growth of mobile tech in the country.

The body’s CEO, Bashir Abiola-Are, praised fintech such as mobile wallets and QR-codes that have increased the efficiency in the way players access the betting industry.

A growth in internet penetration has also had a widely positive impact on engagement with the gambling sector, as the report revealed more than a doubling of the internet users in the country.

Key operators in the country, such as Betway, NairaBET, Bet9ja, 22Bet, and 1xBet, have all seen positive growth through fintech collaborations, utilising mobile wallets to elevate the user experience for gambling.

Read more

Brazil Banks seek SPA guidance to fight gambling crimes 

Febraban, Brazil’s Federation of National Banks, has outlined that it will work with the Ministry of Finance (MEF) and the Secretariat of Prizes and Betting (SPA) to eliminate money laundering from gambling activities.

The statement was made by Febraban President, Isaac Sidney, following a meeting with Ministry of Finance leadership and Regis Dudena, President of the SPA. Dialogue focused on safeguarding Brazil’s regulated betting sector from economic crimes amid concerns that criminal organisations are using online platforms to launder illicit funds, deemed an ‘economic liability’ impacting society.

Febraban, which represents the biggest financial institutions including Bradesco, Banco do Brasil, and Itaú, stressed the need for a coordinated “public-private action plan to prevent the misuse of digital payment systems”, such as Pix, by illegal gambling operators.

Sidney warned: “Online betting platforms are a high-risk channel for money laundering. The public sector and private institutions must act decisively to prevent organised crime from using these tools to expand their financial operations.”

He also called for immediate limits on Pix-based betting transactions: “If banning Pix is not feasible in the short term, then maximum betting limits must be established as the Central Bank already does for night-time transactions.”

The meeting brought together key representatives from Brazil’s banking AML/CTF units, including compliance directors, national managers, and security chiefs, reinforcing the sector’s alignment with federal regulators.

The discussions come as the Ministry of Finance considers increasing the Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) tax rate on fixed-odds betting from 12% to 18%, part of a broader tax reform to boost public revenues and enhance sector transparency.

Separately, in May 2025, Febraban also met with the Associação Nacional de Jogos e Loterias (ANJL) to deepen cooperation. ANJL President Plínio Lemos Jorge warned that illegal operators pose the greatest money laundering risks. He welcomed Febraban’s support and called for closer collaboration between banks and licensed betting operators to protect market integrity.

“We must not lose sight that the real risk lies with unregulated platforms. A unified strategy between the banking sector and licensed operators is essential to build a transparent and compliant gambling ecosystem,” said Jorge.

Chamber proposes funding measure for Deaf Sports

Meanwhile, the Chamber of Deputies continues to review new legislative proposals. Among them, Bill No. 448/2024 would allocate 0.1% of online betting revenues to the Brazilian Confederation of Sports for the Deaf (CBDS), diverting part of the current funding from the Ministry of Sport.

Federal Deputy Flávia Morais (PDT-GO), the bill’s rapporteur, underscored the social value of the measure: “The CBDS plays a vital role in promoting sport among the deaf community. These resources will allow the organisation to expand its work, support more athletes, and strengthen inclusive sporting programmes across the country.”

Taken together, these developments signal Brazil’s determination to strengthen its regulatory framework as the gambling market matures — balancing increased taxation, financial compliance, and social responsibility.

Read more

Online sports betting leads to new injury reporting process for ACC

A Power Four conference is making changes amid the influx of wagering on college sports.

ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips announced at the 2025 ACC Football Kickoff this week changes to the conference’s reporting process for football injuries. Starting this upcoming football season, ACC member institutions will provide public injury reports at least 48 hours before all conference games to protect student-athletes from individuals attempting to obtain insider information used for gambling. The change in procedure will mirror the NFL’s injury reporting process, which applies certain injury designations to athletes.

“There’s stresses on our student-athletes from individuals that are trying to garner information,” said Phillips. “Sometimes it’s pretty innocent because they just want to know, they’re a big fan, but other times it really does trickle and lead yourself to the gambling and sports wagering kind of path.”

The ACC’s rule change requires athletic departments to categorize their fo..

Read more

Romania seeks ‘local controls’ as part of gambling overhaul

Gambling reforms continue to be proposed to the newly assembled coalition government of Romania.

On Friday, Cseke Attila, the Minister of Public Development and Administration, announced that he will propose for local authorities to have direct control to authorise-or-refuse gambling localities.

The Minister believes that his proposal should form part of President Ilie Bolojan‘s new strategy for the economic development of Romania’s rural towns and provinces

The new proposal would grant city halls the right to decide whether to approve gambling activities in their jurisdiction. If permitted, local authorities will also have the power to determine where such activities are located and to impose a special annual tax on licensed operators.

According to Attila, this tax would be unrestricted in scope: “We will not propose limits for the annual tax — it will be up to the city hall to decide.”

The reforms are a central feature of a broader programme by Romania’s Pro-EU Social Democrat coalition to fix the growing economic disparity between cities and rural towns. The coalition’s infrastructure-driven approach is focused on rewarding communities that can responsibly manage development and generate new forms of public revenue. Under the proposed legislation, towns that approve gambling activities can retain revenue through a localised gambling tax.

“Local communities should have the right to decide if they want gambling — and if so, to benefit from it directly,” Attila stated, describing the initiative as both a regulatory and economic development tool. The reform is intended to empower rural municipalities to determine whether gambling aligns with their social interests, while also offering a new financial lever to invest in public services.

Concerns over rising rates of problem gambling in disadvantaged rural communities previously led to national-level intervention. In one of his final acts in office, former Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu authorised the executive order known as Legea Păcănelelor (The “Pannel Law”), which banned slot machines and betting shops from operating in towns with fewer than 15,000 inhabitants.

The order reflected growing public pressure to protect vulnerable communities from the social harms linked to gambling expansion.

Meanwhile, sweeping reforms are also being prepared at the national level. Upon forming the government, Finance Minister Alexandru Nazare announced that Romania would undertake a comprehensive review of its gambling tax regime.

This includes the introduction of a new tax scale on both the income of gambling licence holders and customer winnings. Nazare believes that such reforms could raise more than €1bn annually in additional revenue.

The forthcoming legislation marks what will be Romania’s sixth revision of its gambling tax framework in 2018, underscoring the complexity and volatility of regulating the sector.

In parallel, scrutiny of the gambling sector’s governance continues to mount. The current regulator, ONJN (National Office for Gambling), faces pressure from coalition partner USR, which argues that oversight must be transferred to a newly created agency under the Ministry of Finance. USR has also proposed that, during a transition period, customer gambling spend should be capped at 10% of individual income.

Despite the array of reforms under discussion, the government has so far agreed to move forward with only one immediate legislative change: the introduction of uniform federal rules on gambling self-exclusion, which all licensed operators will be required to implement.

A transitional period of six months will be granted to gambling operators already active in localities, during which they must reapply for permission from local authorities. Without such approval, existing venues will be forced to cease operations.

The proposed decentralisation of gambling controls is expected to form part of the second fiscal reform package currently under development. Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan has confirmed that a decision on adoption will be made by the end of July.

“In the next week and the week after… a decision will be made in the coalition on how these packages will be adopted from a legal point of view,” he said.

Read more

White label casino deals causing an AML headache for UK govt

The British Home Office has declared that there has been an increase in illegal casinos targeting the UK in its latest National Risk Assessment (NRA).

Citing this and other factors the Home Office has raised the anti-money laundering (AML) from low to medium, though the risk for terrorist financing remains low.

The risk level was maintained at low in the 2017 and 2020 Home Office’s NRAs, but the department has opted to raise it due to a number of changes it has observed over the past five years.

Changes in customer, geographical and transaction risks are the main reasons cited by the Home Office. The government is particularly concerned with the increase in funds moving through online casinos, new ways to play casino games and an updated assessment of casinos as Money Service Businesses (MSBs).

In this latter case, not all casinos function as MSBs and the Home Office has noted that the number of casinos offering services like foreign currency exchanges and cheque cashing services has declined, some still do.

MSB services heighten the money laundering risk faced by UK casinos, the Home Office asserts. The 2025 NRA stresses that MSB services attract higher risk customers using higher risk transactional methods, such as those making transitions to and from high risk jurisdictions.

White labels under spotlight
The connectivity between the UK casino sector and counterpart industries in more high risk financial jurisdictions has been causing a headache for British authorities, and those of other jurisdictions, for some time.

Even more alarming for the government is the alleged connections between some UK casino companies and illegal overseas operations. White label deals have been cited as being of particular concern here.

White label deals are commonplace in the UK, whereby companies pay a white label partner to operate their UK domain for them under said partners’ licence. The Home Office is concerned about some cases where operators have relied on unlicensed third parties for compliance.

“In these cases, the licensee would remain responsible for compliance, although they did not always have sufficient oversight,” the National Risk Assessment details.

“These arrangements are now less common, but risks remain where white-label providers offer large numbers of websites, as failure by a single remote casino to control the ML risks relating to their white-label partnerships can impact a significant number of websites.”

White label deals have been the subject of some negative press over the past couple of years. Much of this publicity has been around Isle of Man-based companies, with TGP Europe in particular getting a lot of attention.

Last year, the licence for TGP Europe-operated Kaiyun Sports expired, leading the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) warning the company’s then football partners, Nottingham Forest and Crystal Palace, to reconsider the sponsorships.

TGP Europe would later shut down all of its brands in April 2025, surrender its operating licence and have to pay a substantial fine to the Commission, which accused the firm of failing to carry out sufficient due diligence against its partners, among other licensing breaches.

This came after years of mourning concerns at the Isle of Man government around the island’s targeting by international criminal groups. The Crown Dependency’s government shared concerns previously raised by the UN about the extensive activity of East Asian and Southeast Asian illegal gambling and cryptocurrency operations.

The UK Home Office risk assessment has not singled out any particular geographic region. However, the Home Office has noted that Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) around illegal activity related to casinos have increased from 2020, rising from 6,000 in 2022/23 to 7,500 in 2023/24.

“Illegal casinos continue to attract new customers, heavily targeting online advertising with offers that entice new customers to gamble with them,” the NRA read.

“As they operate illegally, they will not be supervised by the Gambling Commission, nor have a requirement to implement MLR controls. The use of cryptoassets in illegal casinos is also increasing.”

Illegal casinos have been met with regulatory and enforcement action. The report notes that the UKGC issued 1,158 stage one cease and desist notices relating to online casinos, referred 118,181 URLs to Google and Bing and had 81,292 URLs promoting casinos from search engine results between April 2024 and March 2025, for example.

Further challenges are on the horizon though, particularly technological ones. The NRA highlights the use of AI as a key example, with deepfaked documentation commonly used to bypass compliance checks.

The Home Office has also cited the use of in-game currencies as presenting fraud and money laundering risks and crash games being offered by some licensed casinos as presenting a money laundering opportunity for criminals.

The timing of this report is apt, coming at the same time that the licensed betting industry both in the UK and in other European nations continues to make the case that a gambling black market is posing significant risks to regulated gambling sectors.

However, while the NRA has noted the increase in prevalence of illegal gaming, something licensed operators have been highlighting for years, it does also point out some flaws in the regulated industry that operators may want to address if they want their black market concerns to be taken seriously.

Read more

Welsh NHS preparing for gambling harm treatment and prevention duties

Work on gambling harm prevention and treatment programmes funded by mandatory industry payments is underway in Wales, the country’s government has announced.

According to Sarah Murphy MS, the Minister for Mental Health and Wellbeing with the Welsh Labour government, NHS Wales Performance and Improvement and Public Health Wales have already been working on treatment pathways and interventions.

The public health bodies’ work has included a focus on prevention opportunities. It is early days on the projects, however, and it is likely that they will be stepped up from October onwards when the final research, education and treatment (RET) levy payments are made.

The RET levy is one of the key measures of the Gambling Act review, a two-and-a-half year review into the 2005 Gambling Act which concluded with a White Paper published in April 2023.

The levy will see online betting and gaming firms pay 1.1% of revenue and land-based casino and betting firms pay 0.5% of revenue to support education, treatment and prevention initiatives, whether operated by the NHS or the UK’s already extensive charity sector.

The government expects to raise around £100m a year via the levy, of which £20m has been committed to research with £5m to be distributed in Wales. Murphy has clarified that UKRI, lead UK research commissioner, will ‘work closely’ with the Welsh government and Public Health Wales “to ensure Wales’ interests are represented fairly and robustly”.

“The UK government confirmed its intention to introduce a new levy on the gambling industry to tackle gambling harm last year,” Murphy said. “We strongly supported this as it is an important step to ensure work to tackle gambling harm is sustainably funded and independent of the gambling industry.”

In line with the wider remit of the UK-wide NHS to act as the main funding commissioner for the RET funds, the Welsh government has named the aforementioned Public Health Wales and NHS Wales Performance and Improvement as ‘Lead Prevention Coordinator’ and ‘Lead Treatment Coordinator’ respectively.

A parting gift for GambleAware
The decision to name the NHS the lead commissioner for RET funded-activities has been met by some scepticism, however. Firstly, GambleAware, the UK’s largest treatment charity which has for many years been the de facto commissioner of gambling treatment and prevention initiatives via yearly voluntary industry donations has been effectively unseated.

GambleAware had been one of the biggest voices in calling for a mandatory RET levy. However, the charity envisioned an RET levy that would see it retain its position as funding commissioner.

On top of this, there have also been concerns that charities which receive funding through GambleAware would be impacted by these changes. In addition, some have expressed concern that giving the NHS another weighty responsibility after years of pressure building on the service, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, may not be a good idea.

Taking note of some of these concerns, Murphy said: “One of the consequences of the UK Government’s decision to introduce a levy is that GambleAware will no longer be funded in the same way.

“I know some Welsh organisations, such as Adferiad and Ara, receive some of their funding through GambleAware to provide services to people suffering from gambling-related harm.”

To compensate, NHS England, the outgoing agency which has been overseeing the creation of the RET levy in England on behalf of the UK government, has committed to make £11m of levy funding available to support GambleAware throughout 2025/26.

This has been agreed with the Scottish and Welsh governments and so is a UK nationwide initiative. However, it is not permanent, with Murphy herself clarifying that it will only apply to the 2025/26 financial year and that it “does not represent a continued funding commitment to GambleAware”.

The Welsh government’s announcement reaffirms the role the NHS will play in the RET levy, and can serve as a reminder to the gambling industry of the RET levy’s introduction. Operators have been required to make payments from 6 April with the final deadline for said payments falling on 1 October.

Read more

UKGC won’t make any changes to VIP and HVC schemes for now

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has published the results of an updated exercise which looks at the ongoing impact of policy change related to VIP or High Value Customer (HVC) schemes.

In a blog post, the UKGC’s Head of Evidence Assurance and Evaluation, David Taylor, detailed that such VIP and HVC schemes were “no more commonplace” in 2024 than they were in 2021 after the regulatory change, which changed how an operator can make a customer a VIP so that they wouldn’t be used to exploit gamblers.

Operators can only make customers VIPs now once they have checked that their spending is affordable and sustainable as part of their leisure spend; assessed if there is evidence of gambling-related harm or heightened risk linked to vulnerability; make sure they have up to date identity, occupation and source of funds evidence; and continue to verify information provided and conduct ongoing gambling harm checks on each individual.

Individuals at operators are also made personally accountable for the scheme’s management via a senior executive who holds a personal management licence.

In response to the High Value Customer and VIP Scheme Monitoring Report‘s publication, Taylor noted that the report, based on 2024 data, followed a similar process to the report from 2021, so the results can be considered comparable.

However, it was added that the new report “benefits from the addition of further questions and a consideration of whether HVC or ’VIP’ schemes are referenced in Commission casework”.

Land-based casinos

Alongside the fact that the schemes are no more commonplace than they were previously, the number of people in such schemes has remained consistent, with every HVC scheme having a senior executive appointed to oversee operations as well.

The report also found that HVC schemes were “less often assessed as being a contributory factor in issues under investigation within Commission casework”.

The UKGC calculated the proportion of gross gambling yield which is produced by HVC schemes in the sample as being around 3%.

Yet, there was a significant difference between operators and sectors, with land-based casinos having “a greater reliance on scheme members as a proportion of GGY”.

The Commission did acknowledge that staff supervision and interventions can help provide gambling harm support when necessary, and that the vast majority of customers in high-end casinos are high-net-worth individuals based overseas.

Taylor stated: “This factor, in particular, may have led to the difference in GGY proportions compared to other sectors and it’s worth noting that this finding isn’t accompanied with any allegations of consumer harm, but it is something that can be factored into the Commission’s assessment work.”

Outlook

In his closing comments, Taylor noted that while the intended impact of the VIP and HVC scheme changes is being accomplished, it’s important to remember that the exercise was “reasonably modest in scope”.

“Limitations are detailed in the report and include details about the sample of operators and how this is intended to provide a relatively high-level overview of the policy’s effectiveness. It’s also worth noting that the impact of this policy is also influenced by other changes to regulatory requirements on topics such as customer interaction, for example.”

Taylor concluded that, for now, no additional changes will be made to VIP and HVC schemes, but the UKGC is still ready to step in when required.

“Although evaluation exercises like this will never be able to give total assurance, it does provide an indication that the regulatory objectives have been delivered and further changes are not currently required.

“Where operators fail to meet requirements, we will continue to take action.”

Read more