Labour MP says “nobody wants to see” gambling ads

A Labour MP has launched a tirade against gambling industry adverts, claiming that “nobody wants to see them”.

Alex Ballinger, MP for Halesowen and a consistent advocate for greater taxation and regulation of the gambling industry, implied the industry should reset its priorities as stakeholders continue to raise warnings over the potential implications of tax rises.

The accusations come after figures were published by The Guardian, which estimated gambling companies, including the lottery, spent £2bn on marketing in 2024.

“Perhaps gambling firms should think about cutting back on adverts that nobody wants to see before pushing back against paying fair taxes on their vast profits, particularly given the harms they cause,” Ballinger said, as he described the £2bn figure as an “astronomic sum”.

Ballinger was among the 101 Labour MPs who signed a letter in September urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to take a “polluter pays” approach to taxing online gaming, arguing that the sector faces a lighter financial burden compared to markets such as the Netherlands and Austria.

The group joined think tanks, opposition parties and the former MP Gordon Brown in piling pressure on Reeves to target gambling ahead of the UK budget.

In response, industry leaders have warned of significant consequences if the sector’s financial burden is increased as part of Wednesday’s (26 November) budget, including the prospect of job losses, venue closures and a reduction in investment within the UK sector.

BGC battles back

Chief among those battling on the gambling industry’s behalf has been the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC).

The industry body has refuted The Guardian’s report, claiming that the true figure sits closer to £1bn and has declined in recent years, while also warning that “undermining” advertising spend by regulated operators plays directly into the hands of the UK’s black market.

“20% of all broadcast and digital advertising is dedicated entirely to safer gambling messaging, a voluntary commitment made by the UK industry,” a BGC spokesperson said.

“Further tax rises would simply drive more consumers towards the growing black market that offers no age checks, no safer gambling tools and no tax contribution, while undermining advertising spend that differentiates the regulated market.”

Fears over black market advertising are not unfounded. A Reuters report published last month raised major concerns over the extent of fraudulent ads across Meta’s platforms, including for online casinos.

According to the report, the tech giant projected that 10% of its overall annual revenue for 2024 – roughly $16bn – came from running ads for scams and banned goods.

These concerns were also echoed by Eilers & Krejcik’s industry analyst, Alun Bowden, who questioned how people will navigate the “almost invisible” barriers to the black market.

A recent study from the UKGC revealed that only a minority of players are aware that they have strayed into the illegal market.

“In a world where one site can look much like another on the surface, and the differences are in the nuances underneath, then how do you stand out?” said Bowden.

“If you reduce advertising spend significantly, then you give more parity to black market operators who are increasingly spending more on SEO, affiliates, streamers and social media.”

Read more

Pan-Nordic Gambling Study to examine habits across region

Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden have aligned to launch the joint research project on gambling, gathering comparable knowledge about gambling habits and gambling problems in the region.

It marks a key move from the Nordic countries as they seek to learn lessons from each other in a bid to strengthen each market’s understanding of gambling habits and subsequently bolster player safeguards.

Approximately 30,000 randomly selected people, aged 18 to 80, from each country will participate in the study across the Nordic region, with invitations sent by post and reminders sent via Kivra.

The survey is being conducted in collaboration with the Swedish Gambling Authority (Spelinspektionen), Danish Gambling Authority (Spillemyndigheden), Aalborg University, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, University of Iceland, Norwegian Gambling and Foundation Authority (Lotteritilsynet) and the University of Bergen.

Maria Vinberg, Investigator at Spelinspektionen, commented: “The study will provide a basis for assessing gambling and gambling problems in the Nordic countries.

It will be exciting to compare the results with previous Swedish data and with the rest of the Nordic countries, especially since so few similar joint surveys have been conducted in Europe.”

To be answered digitally, the study questions will cover topics such as gambling, computer games and problems related to gambling.

The Pan-Nordic Gambling Study’s results will be published in the spring next year, with a selection of the results reported in the Swedish Public Health Agency’s statistical database, Folkhälsodata, and on the knowledge website spelprevention.

Ombudsman criticism

However, the study comes as Spelinspektionen receives criticism from the Swedish Ombudsman.

On its website, the Swedish authority stated that the Ombudsman criticised Spelinspektionen for not previously being able to exclude individuals from gambling without electronic identification.

In the summer of 2024, a person requested to be banned from gambling without electronic identification, but it took approximately a month for the person’s request to be processed by Spelinspektionen.

The Swedish authority said in a statement that Spelpaus, its self-exclusion service, was built “on the basic idea that the Swedish Gambling Authority would not handle any suspensions manually”, and so the person would go onto the website and confirm their exclusion with an electronic ID.

Spelinspektionen said: “Until the summer of 2024, it was not possible to exclude oneself from gambling without an e-ID. After the court found in the spring of 2024 that there were no formal requirements for reporting, the Swedish Gambling Authority began work on enabling manual handling of suspensions in the system.”

However, the Ombudsman responded that the Swedish authority “cannot escape criticism because there was no alternative to banning” when the request was made and that “the information about why the processing was delayed should have been better”.

Read more

UK Gov publishes voluntary code for £1bn prize draw industry

The UK Government has intervened in the surge of engagement within prize draws and published a voluntary code for the sector.

Those in the UK will be increasingly familiar with the increasing number of advertisements across television and social media offering the chance to enter draws to win prizes such as houses, cars, and other luxury items for as little as a few pence.

However, due to offering a free entry route, prize draw operators are not required to apply for a gambling licence.

In response to the growing popularity – 7.4 million adults take part in prize draws annually in the UK – the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has published a new voluntary code of conduct for the sector. The government is making significant efforts to strengthen player protections and increase transparency and accountability around the vertical.

Gambling adjacent

Although not licensed by the UK Gambling Commission, DCMS points to the significant similarities between the two sectors, noting that 88% of prize draw participants also participate in gambling or lottery activities.

For comparison, this figure is just 60% for the wider population.

Given the similarities, many of the proposed measures are akin to those found within the gambling industry.

The voluntary guidelines require operators to implement robust age verification checks, introduce spending limits and suspensions for players to reduce gambling risks and adhere to a £250 per month cap on credit card transactions.

There must also be greater transparency around the rules for entering and how prizes are won, as well as clear guidelines on how charity-supporting draws support their causes in line with fundraising regulations.

Pivotal moment

The new rules, due to come into effect from May 2026, represent a “pivotal moment” for the industry, according to Pinsent Masons’ prize competition expert, Scott Oxley.

“While not legally binding, it sets a clear benchmark for transparency, consumer protection, and accountability,” he said. “Operators who ignore it risk reputational harm and may accelerate the move towards statutory regulation.”

So far, the code has 46 signatories from operators, including the industry leader Omaze, as well as 11 from other relevant parties, such as web developers.

Although voluntary, it’s clear that the flourishing nature of prize draws means that the sector will continue to garner greater attention and scrutiny from lawmakers.

As a result, Oxley added, early adoption of the rules will gain a competitive advantage as standards such as clear disclosure of routes and responsible play messaging become the norm.

“Those who lead on these standards will build consumer trust and reduce regulatory risk,” he explained.

“The code is voluntary today, but its principles will shape tomorrow’s regulatory landscape. Proactive engagement positions operators ahead of the curve and demonstrates a commitment to integrity in a fast-growing market. Those who do not adopt it are likely to face greater scrutiny from the regulators.”

Read more

BCLC partners with GenWell to launch Human Connection Project

The British Columbia Lottery Corporation (BCLC) has partnered with Canadian registered charity GenWell to launch its Human Connection Project.

BCLC’s Human Connection Project aims to foster stronger and healthier communities in the province through on-the-ground projects, community impact initiatives and partnerships.

GenWell provides education programming across Canada, and BCLC will work with the non-profit to amplify opportunities for human connection across its organization, including in its community initiatives and its employee programs. GenWell will provide resources including research gathering, resource development and project planning and activation.

“At BCLC, giving back to community has always been part of our DNA,” said BCLC President and CEO Pat Davis. “Since 1985, our net profits – more than $30 billion – have supported communities, provincial programs and services, local employment, charities and major events that have helped shape B.C.

“This year, we decided to use our presence in communities across B.C. to focus our social purpose, which is to generate win-wins for the greater good. We’re excited to work with GenWell to help BCLC and communities raise awareness of the importance of human connection and how we can embed it in the work we do.”

“Human connection isn’t just a ‘nice-to-have’,” added GenWell Founder Pete Bombaci. “We know that meaningful social interactions can improve mental and physical health, strengthen communities and even boost resilience. That’s why we’re proud to work with BCLC, to help promote the importance of human connection across our communities and throughout day-to-day life.”

Partners to work on community projects and events
Together, BCLC and GenWell will co-create local projects and work to improve gathering spaces in communities in B.C., working colaboratively with the communities themselves.

Initiatives will include creating new games and experiences, building new partnerships, launching community events or shared spaces for great social outings.

While the project’s work will span the entire province, BCLC will celebrate the Human Connection Project’s launch in Kamloops, which has been the home of the lottery’s headquarters for 40 years.

BCLC is the presenting sponsor of Kamloops’ inaugural Christmas Market, which runs until Nov. 30. It has set up a Connection Corner for community interaction (pictured above), featuring some of its community partners including United Way, the Kamloops Symphony Orchestra and Western Canada Theatre.

The lottery is also running a Scratch & Win ticket promotion that gives players the chance to win a top prize of $10,000 for themselves and $10,000 for a registered B.C. charity of their choice. Earlier in 2025, BCLC collaborated with Vancouver Canucks owners Canucks Sports & Entertainment to host Nourish the Neighbourhood to provide meals for residents of Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside.

Read more

What we know about a new era for Sri Lanka gambling regulation

Sri Lanka sits on the cusp of a new regulatory framework that is likely to usher in widespread changes for the country’s gambling sector.

The country’s government confirmed that the Gambling Regulatory Authority remit to oversee all gaming operations will begin on 1 December.

The date will mark the culmination of an extensive process after Sri Lanka’s Cabinet approved a draft bill in February 2025 before it was officially presented to parliament in June – but how will it actually evolve the country’s gambling ecosystem – remains to be seen.

Time for change

The Gambling Regulatory Authority Bill moves to unify Sri Lanka’s currently fragmented gaming landscape and repeal the Gambling Ordinance, Casino Ordinance and Horse Racing Betting Ordinance.

Supporters of the change point to the outdated nature of the current legislation. The Gambling Ordinance was drafted in 1887 while the laws relating to casinos and horse racing betting were implemented in 1988.

By moving to close loopholes and clarify overlapping regulation, the Sri Lankan Government hopes to “promote tourism, employment and economic development through the regulated operation of gambling activities”, alongside improving tax collection and fighting against the undercurrent of Sri Lanka’s black market while encouraging iGaming expansion.

The new regulator will function “as the sole independent regulator with a broad and overarching scope on operations in the gambling industry”, including online gaming and offshore gambling activities on ships in the port city of Colombo.

This includes issuing and renewing gaming licences, enforcing the guidelines associated with the licence and collecting tax revene.

As of yet, no Director-General or Chairperson has been named for the regulator. The board will be made up of the Secreatry of the Ministry of Finance, Commissioner General of Indland Revenue, Head of the Financial Intelligence United and the Inspector General of the Police.

Three extra members of the board with knowledge of gambling regulation will be appointed by the Finance Minsiter, one of which will then be appointed as Chair. The board will also select the regulator’s Director-General.

Anyone found offering, promoting or taking part in unlicensed gambling may be fined, sentenced to up to two years in prison, or both.

A new Macau?

Sri Lanka is already home to seven casinos, and one of the country’s latest additions has high hopes to turn the nation into a destination for gaming for its neighbours.

Upon the opening of the $1.2bn City of Dreams Sri Lanka project, Melco Resorts & Entertainment’s Chair, Lawrence Ho, set out his aspiration that “Sri Lanka can be to India what Macau is to China”.

“Macau is by far the biggest gaming market in the world. Colombo is the closest destination to India, and an integrated resort like this gives the city a lot of potential,” he told local media.

Macau’s gross gaming revenue topped $28.35bn, so even emulating this on a much smaller scale would represent a sharp financial boost for a country that is still looking to bounce back from an economic crisis that triggered a bailout from the International Monetary Fund in 2023.

Although Ho cited neighbouring India as a key target market, Sri Lanka may also hope to garner visitors from Thailand, where efforts to implement casino regulation hit a legislative brick wall due to significant political turmoil.

Read more

Dutch consumer groups demand compensation over sites’ illegal practices 

Consumer Rights groups in the Netherlands continue to press the government to take action on compensation of players prior for misleading and harmful practices.

The latest intervention comes from Consumentenbond (Consumers’ Association) and the Consumers’ Competition Claims Foundation, which have formally demanded that leading online casinos compensate players misled or encouraged into excessive gambling prior to market regulation.

Dutch online gambling licences named include: bet365, Betcity, Holland Casino, Jacks, Unibet and Toto, alleging that the operators violated their legal obligations by providing unclear information, unfair defaults, and deceptive bonus offers that encouraged players to spend irresponsibly.

Sandra Molenaar, Director of Consumentenbond, commented: “Online casinos are trying to rip off as much money as possible from consumers. This is not only irresponsible, but also completely illegal. Consumers are entitled to compensation for these illegal practices — and we will try to arrange that for them.”

Echoing her view, Bert Heikens, Chairman of the Consumers’ Competition Claims Foundation, added: “Consumers must be able to rely on a safe gaming environment. That was, simply put, the intention when online gambling was legalised in the Netherlands. That’s not the case now. Consumers are at the mercy of the wolves.”

Both organisations have called on the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) to investigate whether licensed operators breached their duty-of-care commitments, warning that collective legal action will follow if no remedial action is taken.

Unibet faces explosive €75m lawsuit

The mounting consumer backlash coincides with a separate €75 million collective compensation claim filed in September against Unibet Netherlands by consumer-claims organisation Dynamiet.

Representing 2,500 Dutch players, the case — now before the District Court of The Hague — alleges that Unibet and its parent company, Kindred Group, facilitated illegal online gambling and targeted Dutch consumers before the Remote Gambling Act (KOA) came into effect on 1 October 2021.

“For many of these people, it’s not primarily about money — it’s about recognition,” said Deepak Thakoerdien, co-founder of Dynamiet. “They were ignored for years while being drained by an illegal casino. Waiting is for spectators; we are here to act.”

Dynamiet argues that Unibet’s Dutch-language website, iDEAL payment system, and local customer support demonstrate a deliberate focus on the Dutch market before licensing. The organisation also referenced the 2019 KSA fine against Unibet for illegal activity, calling for past violations to be factored into current regulatory oversight.

Legal experts have described the case as a potential landmark in European gambling law, setting a precedent for retroactive liability and paving the way for broader restitution claims against other pre-KOA operators.

Response and assurance needed in 2026

As regulatory and legal scrutiny grows, stakeholders are watching closely to see how the Netherlands’ new liberal coalition government will approach KOA market reforms.

The administration faces a pivotal decision — whether to empower the KSA to enforce tougher compliance measures, or allow the judiciary to absorb a wave of collective lawsuits that could overwhelm the courts and ultimately demand full government intervention.

For Consumentenbond and its partners, the message remains clear: until accountability is enforced, the promise of a safe and transparent online gambling market will remain unfulfilled.

Read more

Maryland lawmaker reportedly wants to consider a ban on micro bets

A lawmaker in Maryland wants the state to consider prohibiting micro betting as a professional sports league deals with allegations of game manipulation by athletes.

According to a report from The Baltimore Sun, House of Delegates member Jason Buckel wants the state to consider banning or changing rules related to micro bets as MLB deals with a gambling scandal tied to the alleged manipulation of pitch-level markets.

“We definitely should take a strong look at it [micro betting],” Buckel told The Baltimore Sun. “I believe the best course of action would be to either outright ban those types of individual-play prop bets or to very significantly limit the amount that could be wagered on those types of sporting activities.”

Buckel wants Maryland to consider a ban on micro bets after MLB warned state gaming regulators in 2021 about the risks associated with offering the betting markets. MLB pointed directly to the risk of offering pitch-level markets and called for discussions on the ma..

Read more

NCAA to maintain restriction on professional sports gambling

The NCAA is no longer considering a rule change that would have allowed its student-athletes to wager on professional sports.

The governing body of college sports announced that its Division I member schools voted to rescind an approved rule change that would have lifted a ban on pro sports betting.

DI institutions had the opportunity to rescind the rule change as part of the NCAA’s protocols, which allow DI schools to vote whether to rescind an approved rule change within 30 days if a proposal doesn’t receive at least 75% of votes from the DI Board.

Last month, the board voted to adopt the proposal, but with fewer than 75% of the votes.

The lack of votes allowed DI member institutions to vote on the issue, with two-thirds of the schools voting against lifting the NCAA’s ban on pro sports betting.

The NCAA considered a change of stance regarding pro sports betting as its bylaws “were written and adopted at a time when sports gambling was largely illegal nationwide,” said Universit..

Read more