Steve Hoare

Romania tightens celebrity gambling promotion rules

Romania’s National Audiovisual Council (CNA) has prohibited celebrities from participating in gambling promotions.

The decision was unanimously approved by the watchdog during a public session held on 26 June, where figureheads amended the Audiovisual Regulatory Code to include a ban on celebrity appearances in gambling adverts across TV. radio, and online.

As quoted by Romanian media outlet PaginaDeMedia, the changes read: “It is prohibited to broadcast advertising for gambling in which public, cultural, scientific, sports personalities or other individuals who, due to their online notoriety, may encourage participation in such games, are present.”

Celebrities previously featured in gambling ad campaigns include football players like Florin Răducioiu, Răzvan Raț, and Ilie Dumitrescu, together with famous singers like Antonia, Lora, and Alex Velea.

This will no longer be possible after the updated framework comes into force within three months of the vote’s date.

As expected, the vote did not go without some resistance from the gambling sector and relevant stakeholders. Interested groups tried to submit draft provisions that would avoid a full-on ban.

Requests made to the CNA mainly revolved around allowing celebrities to participate in social responsibility campaigns, as proposed by Winbet, Kaizen Gaming, the Romanian Football Federation, and the Federation of Gambling Organisers. They were all rejected.

As part of the new legislation, on-demand streaming services will also have to comply with the new rules, which are directed towards reducing the influence of gambling ads on children.

The changes come at a turbulent time for the Romanian gambling sector, with the national regulator ONJN under fire over €900m missing in tax fees.

Headed by a new President as a result of the fallout, the gambling authority is now on a crusade to strengthen player safety standards within the Romanian market, which includes a rework of the national self-exclusion scheme.

In addition, the regulator recently asked Meta and Google to aid its efforts against online promotions of black market operators.

Read more

IBJR study reveals illegal market to be up to 51 per cent in Brazil

Brazil’s illegal betting market represents an estimated annual loss of up to R$ 10.8 billion in public revenue, according to the study “Off the Radar: Size and Socioeconomic Impacts of the Illegal Betting Market in Brazil”, conducted by LCA Consultores with support from the Brazilian Institute for Responsible Gaming (IBJR) and based on data collected…

Read more

Buenos Aires set double the tax on online gambling

The Buenos Aires City Legislature is considering a bill, presented by the Civic Coalition party, to raise the tax on online gambling from 6 to 12 percent. In the city, the activity pays half the tax of land-based gambling, which has much higher operating costs. Buenos Aires legislator Facundo del Gaiso’s initiative will be voted on today in…

Read more

Ladbrokes’ breach of ASA Code should set an example, legal expert says

A legal advisor has cautioned UK operators like Ladbrokes to always ensure they remain on the safe side when it comes to advertising.

Felix Faulkner, solicitor at licensing law firm Poppleston Allen, gave his two cents on the recent Ladbrokes fallout with the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) by highlighting the importance of placing a promotion within a wider social context before running it.

Measure twice, cut once
Addressing all UK operators, Faulkner advised that companies should be aware of three main points when handling promotions – the terminology and naming of the products or offers, the historic and current colloquial use of the terms being used, and the implications of any derivative advertising efforts.

“Responsible gambling is a fundamental tenet of the Gambling Act, and the remit falls solely in the laps of operators and licence holders to ensure that their marketing and advertisements always adhere to the LCCP and the ASA regulations,” the solicitor added.

“It is always better to be safe than sorry.”

Ladbrokes learns firsthand
What led to Faulkner’s comments was a recent decision by the ASA to uphold several complaints made against Ladbrokes advertisements.

The case featured the operator’s airing of two TV and video-on-demand promotions featuring its free-to-play game currency called ‘Ladbucks’.

ASA’s subsequent ruling deemed the adverts potentially appealing to minors due to the branding terminology, with ‘bucks’ specifically reminiscent of the ‘V-bucks’ virtual currency used in the video game Fortnite, and the ‘Robux’ currency of the video game Roblox – both games immensely popular among children.

In addition, the advertising regulator saw a problem with the term ‘lad’ as well – although it has been intrinsic to the Ladbrokes brand since its inception.

ASA stated that it views the word ‘lad’ as a colloquial UK term referring to a boy or a young man, which combined with the word ‘bucks’ constitutes a breach of its anti-minor advertising code altogether.
Ladbrokes, which is a property of Entain, has disagreed with both conclusions, but has nevertheless taken action to remove the featured content.

Faulkner concluded: “While it is understandable that a brand called Ladbrokes might produce an in-play betting reward token with the term ‘lad’ in it, it is of utmost importance for all licence holders to sense-check a number of things before running a promotion.

“It is evident from the Ladbrokes decision that the ASA believed the close link to Fortnite and Roblox pushed this proposal over the line, and the argued mitigation from Ladbrokes was not enough to defend the case.”

Read more

Sweden clamps down on influencers promoting illegal gambling on Twitch

The Swedish Gambling Authority (SGA) has officially stopped influencers from promoting illegal gambling on Twitch.

A number of influencers were placed under supervision within an ongoing initiative to curb illegal gambling marketing – particularly content directed at Swedish audiences through digital platforms.

Marketing of gambling services to Swedish consumers is prohibited unless the operator holds a valid licence, as detailed in Sweden’s Gambling Act 2018. Twitch is of particular concern as it is a platform mainly used by younger audiences.

It is important to note that the SGA identified highlighted gambling amongst youths as a key focus area for regulatory oversight in its 2025 operational plan.

Now, the authority assures that those influencers who have been subject to supervision have completely ceased marketing illegal gambling.

It detailed in a statement: “The Swedish Gambling Authority’s operational plan for 2025 states that young people’s gambling and illegal gambling will be the focus of the authority’s supervision.

“The Swedish Gambling Authority will also continue to supervise influencers and other actors who conduct or promote illegal gambling under the Gambling Act.”

A global operation
The country’s clampdown on illegal activity of this kind falls in line with a growing number of jurisdictions overseas which are becoming stricter in terms of influencer marketing regulations in iGaming.

Similarly, in several regions, such as Brazil, YouTube introduced strict measures in March this year which now blocks user content that is related to illegal online gambling websites – though these policies are not isolated to Brazil, they do have a particular relevance to their developing market.

YouTube’s policy statement, as reported by SBC Noticias – BR, read: “Content that promises guaranteed returns may be removed, regardless of whether the online gambling site or app has been approved by Google.”

The UK is also closely monitoring influencer activity in the betting sector. For example, the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) recently issued a warning to Stars Interactive, operator of PokerStars, over a “socially irresponsible” advert that featured social media stars.

Swedish market situation
As Sweden continues to closely monitor illegal activity in the sector, preliminary results for the country’s gambling market have recently revealed a slight drop in Q1 turnover compared to the previous corresponding quarter.

Interestingly, licensed operators saw a total of SEK 6.6bn (£512m) being staked in the three months ending March, representing a 0.9% drop from the SEK 6.7bn in Q1 2024.

Online betting and gaming led the turnover pack with a total volume of SEK 4.3bn. This is historically the segment which customers engage the most with, averaging more than SEK 4bn throughout 2024.

Read more

Senate Inquiry urges vote to impose radical penalties on Brazil Bets regime

Ricardo Assis – SBC Noticias Brazil
The CPI’s rapporteurs are demanding a shock to the system and reset of the governance, regulation, and enforcement of Brazil’s online gambling sector. Ricardo Assis, Editor of SBC Noticias Brazil declares that all regulatory conditions the Bets regime face scrutiny.

A series of radical reforms, penalties and criminal enforcements have been proposed by the Senate’s Commission Inquiry (CPI) evaluating the economic and social impacts of the Bets Regime.

Just 19 weeks since the CPI commenced its evaluation, led by Senator Soraya Thronicke (Podemos–MS) and Dr Hiran Gonçalves (PP–RR), the rapporteurs have submitted their recommendations to the Senate.

The CPI was established to evaluate the economic liabilities and social threats of Brazil legalising online gambling since 1 January 2025.

The inquiry heard testimonies from operators, stakeholders and whistleblowers on wide ranging topics from fraud and match-fixing to money laundering, advertising malpractice and the absence of consumer safeguards.

Of significance, the inquiry hit national headlines after testimony concerning Virginia Fonseca, a social media influencer with over 50 million followers, who is accused of misleading advertising and acting as a financial beneficiary of unlicensed operators.

As reported by SBC Notícias, the CPI’s final report calls for 16 indictments, targeting both individuals and entities. Fonseca, alongside influencer Deolane Bezerra, is named in connection with promoting illegal betting operators, with the report stating it was “unlikely” that Bezerra “ceased to be an effective partner and simply became a spokesperson.”

The report proposes the criminalisation of match manipulation in sports be signed into federal law. An action to be governed by the creation of a ‘National Sports Integrity Authority’, that will oversee the regulation of automated systems used by betting platforms.

Algorithms, the report noted, often operate without independent certification, making it “difficult for the bettor to assess the real risk involved.” A technical audit protocol is proposed, under regulatory supervision, to ensure transparency in how odds and promotions are determined.

The commission warns that betting platforms have become conduits for illicit financial activities. Evidence presented to the CPI outlined the use of fragmented transactions, third-party CPFs, untraceable crypto operations, and withdrawals routed through accounts tied to Brazil’s social welfare schemes. To counteract these abuses, the CPI has recommended data-sharing protocols between the Federal Tax Authority, COAF, and licensed operators, as well as regular financial audits.

Brazilian football, a key beneficiary of betting sponsorship, came under heavy criticism. Club executives admitted they lacked integrity departments and were often unaware of commercial terms involving gambling partners, with many deals brokered through intermediaries. The commission labelled this state of affairs “institutional omission” and “structural unpreparedness.”

Digital influencers, a core channel for consumer engagement, were described in the report as central players in normalising irresponsible betting behaviours. As such, affiliate contracts linking influencer revenue to user losses were described by the commission as “anti-educational and perverse.” The CPI has formally requested investigations into these arrangements by COAF and Receita Federal.

The report further urges an outright ban on online casino-style games, denouncing them as “online slot machines with exclusively deleterious characteristics,” while calling for extensive reform of betting advertising, including:

Prohibition of gambling ads during prime-time TV
Bans on welcome bonuses and misleading promotions
Mandatory age and financial suitability checks for bettors

Additional proposals include embedding gambling addiction awareness and financial literacy into school curricula, alongside national prevention campaigns supported by the SUS, NGOs and “conscientious influencers.”

Despite being tabled, the report will not be voted on immediately. As SBC Notícias reports, several senators have called for more time to review its recommendations. CPI President Dr Hiran has since indicated that he will move to postpone the vote until the following week.

Political consequences now loom for Brazil’s fledgling Bets Regime. Last week, Finance Minister Fernando Haddad has backed a provisional measure to raise the GGR tax on licensed operators from 12% to 18%, as a measure to fill budgetary gaps of the PT government.

A pending tax hike underscores the government’s push for tighter fiscal and regulatory oversight, prompting a coalition of trade bodies to challenge a tax framework they argue imposes an effective burden exceeding 50%.

The publication of the CPI’s report and its pending vote bring a turbulent close to the first six months of the Bets Regime existence. With mounting headwinds of tax hikes, compliance demands and the threat of criminal sanctions, the competitive landscape of Brazil’s online gambling market is poised for reshaping in the second half of the year. The only certainty, it seems, is continued volatility of a fragile Bets market that has been radically transformed since its launch on 1 January.

Read more

Gordon Moody makes crisis call at House of Commons

The UK’s leading residential treatment charity Gordon Moody co-hosted a reception with Labour Party MP Chris Bloore at the House of Commons yesterday to raise awareness of the growing crisis surrounding the implementation of the research, education and treatment levy. A room full of dignitaries, industry representatives and other charities heard about the life-changing services…

Read more

BGC: Increased gambling tax would bolster the dangerous black market

Fears of a tax increase on online gambling in the UK loom while a new YouGov survey suggests that 65% of bettors agree that such change “would make customers turn to unregulated betting sites”.

The research was commissioned by the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), the trade and standards body for UK betting, which warns that this shift could not only fail to generate more tax revenue but also jeopardise player safety.

Furthermore, the BGC is also concerned that increased taxation would severely impact the financial health of sports, particularly horseracing, which currently receives significant funding from its members.

Undermining the regulated gambling market

UK gambling is a highly regulated sector, servicing 14 million adults (excluding the National Lottery) who gamble per month and generating £10.9bn in annual gross gambling yield (GGY).

Licensing duties see consumers protected by safer gambling rules, compliance monitoring, customer care interventions, responsible gambling tools, controls, and financial probity – UKGC.

With the government now consulting on a major change to the way betting and gaming is taxed online, fears of a price increase for betting on sports like racing and football are only on the rise.

Sporting betting and online gaming is currently taxed at different rates, but last month HM Treasury launched a new consultation which proposed a single new tax.

Describing the stats as “shocking”, BGC CEO Grainne Hurst said that these figures prove what’s at stake if the government forces through a self-defeating tax hike on ordinary punters.

“It’s clear it will not raise more tax, it simply risks forcing huge numbers of customers out of the regulated market, with its world leading standards on player safety, into the arms of the growing, illegal, unregulated and unsafe gambling black market online,” she said.

“Any tax rises would make a mockery of the Government’s growth strategy and be catastrophic for horseracing, which is already facing a bleak financial outlook.”

A wake up call
The study revealed that only 23% of punters believe a tax hike is unlikely to have an impact on customers moving towards the black market.

It is also worth noting that the argument around the potential impact of the black market is a long-running one – and one which politicians have not always been very receptive to.

Hurst continued: “This is a wake up call for the government, punters have been loud and clear, hit them with further taxes and they will walk away from sports like racing, straight to the black market, triggering a spiral of decline.”

The survey posed a scenario to customers: “Imagine that betting on sports events like horseracing became more expensive because the government increased the amount of tax that betting companies have to pay. How likely or unlikely do you think it is, if at all, that this would make customers turn to unregulated betting sites that don’t have to pay any tax at all?”

As stated above, the BGC’s main concerns are about the black market. It was only at the end of last year that the Council warned the government that unregulated black market gambling poses greater risks than perceived by British consumers.

This followed a study published by microeconomics consultancy Frontier Economics and was described as “the first major study on the black market since the publication of the previous Government’s White Paper on gambling reforms”.

The coverage and ease of promotion of illegal websites were detailed as an area of concern, as 15% (2.8 million people) of gamblers who responded to the survey said they had heard of at least one of the black market sites listed.

The BGC also revealed that 1.5 million Brits stake up to £4.3bn on the growing gambling black market annually.

The organisation concluded: “This growing, unsafe, illegal gambling black market does not contribute to sport, does not pay tax and targets customers who are vulnerable to harm, including the self-excluded.”

Read more