iGamingExpert

Videoslots’ UKGC sanction highlights open-loop payment concerns

Significant risks associated with the use of pre-paid digital vouchers have been laid bare in the UK Gambling Commission’s latest action.

The UK regulator has ordered Videoslots Limited, the operator of videoslots.co.uk, mrvegas.com and megariches.com, to pay £650,000 after an investigation revealed anti-money laundering and social responsibility failures.

The case cited a customer who was able to fund their account in excess of £75,000 using digital pre-payment vouchers, before transferring the proceeds of their gambling activity to four different bank accounts.

Despite the presence of these high-risk factors, the customer’s automated AML risk score did not trigger the threshold for the operator to request source of funds information promptly, ‘leading to unacceptable delays in an account review taking place’.

John Pierce, Commission Director of Enforcement, explained: “Open-loop payment systems are high risk in nature because they could enable anonymous deposits and make it harder to trace funds.

“In this case, the licensee failed to implement timely customer interactions and did not conduct enhanced customer due diligence until the customer had reached significant spend thresholds – such failings are unacceptable.”

UKGC guidance classifies all pre-paid payment methods as high-risk due to the ability for these methods to be pre-loaded using cash or, in some cases, cryptoassets.

The commission requires such payment methods to be factored into a customer’s risk profile and appropriate risk-based due diligence to be undertaken.

“Operators must review how open-loop payment systems such as prepaid digital vouchers are managed in a gambling environment because they are high risk and present operational challenges in terms of effective monitoring,” added Pierce.

Commission calls for crypto review

The need to address the rising popularity of crypto payments has been a particular focus for the UKGC’s CEO, Andrew Rhodes, who earlier this month emphasised the “pressure building within the system”.

“The reality is, in some years to come, there will probably be a significant cohort of consumers who use cryptocurrencies because that is what they’re accustomed to. It is a demographic shift that will find they have no place in the legitimate industry because of the currency they use,” stated Rhodes during his CEO briefing.

He added that any changes must be led by government-level discussions, as ‘once you open that door, you cannot close it’.

“The reality is, and this growth in those demographics means, I don’t think governments can ignore that pattern,” said Rhodes.

Not the first infraction

Other failures highlighted by the UKGC investigation included Videoslots’ deposit limit mechanism. Although the operator’s monitoring systems automatically set a monthly deposit, that limit ran across a calendar month and did not include the customer’s initial deposit.

As a result, a customer was able to lose £5,000 in a month despite having a £3,000 monthly deposit limit. Another also lost £7,500 over 18 days despite having a £2,000 monthly deposit limit.

The UKGC also noted that the monitoring systems deployed by Videoslots also did not effectively identify customers who were potentially at risk of gambling harm, citing one customer who did not receive any interaction from the operator despite losing £6,550 over the course of three active days of gambling across a two-month period.

Alongside the financial penalty, Videoslots has received a warning and is also required to undergo a third-party audit to ensure it is implementing its AML and safer gambling policies and procedures.

This is not the first time that Videoslots has been in hot water with the UKGC. In June 2023, the company paid £2m as part of a settlement with the regulator due to similar AML and social responsibility failures.

iGaming Expert has reached out to Videoslots Limited for comment.

Read more

Gaming Compliance acquires controversial Yield Sec

Gaming Compliance International has moved to significantly elevate the war against the black market through the acquisition of Yield Sec for an undisclosed sum.

As a result of the deal, Yield Sec’s platform, processes and team will be integrated into GCI’s operations. Ismail Vali, Founder and CEO of the black market monitoring platform, will also assume the role of President of GCI.

Matt Holt, CEO of GCI, commented: “We are proud to welcome Ismail Vali and the entire Yield Sec team to GCI. This acquisition accelerates our mission to deliver transparency, integrity, player protection and certainty for regulated jurisdictions worldwide.

“Yield Sec’s innovative platform for effective and efficient disruption will become a cornerstone of our offering, enabling regulators and operators to gain unprecedented awareness and actionable awareness across the total online gaming marketplace.”

According to GCI, Yield Sec’s machine-led monitoring technology, which it says was adapted from military anti-terrorism and counterinsurgency, will become a core pillar of the company’s offering as it seeks to deliver advanced regulatory technology and marketplace transparency to the global gaming industry.

Vali described joining forces with GCI as the “next stage in our mission to defeat black market crime and protect the integrity of regulated gaming”.

“Yield Sec was founded to help regulators and operators see the entire online marketplace – legal and illegal – and act with certainty,” he added.

“GCI strengthens that foundation, expanding our ability to serve clients across commerce, community, and consumers. The purpose remains the same: to secure a sustainable, compliant, and fair marketplace that benefits everyone.”

Yield Sec was founded in 2020 through a collaboration between the marketing agency A Game Above and the player protection company Beanstalk to provide a tool for the industry to monitor and counter black market gambling activity.

Black market trepidation

The deal comes at a time when the global black market is becoming an increasingly prevalent and distressing issue for the regulated iGaming sector.

The Betting and Gaming Council recently estimated that £2.7bn is staked annually on the online black market in the UK, equivalent to 2.1% of the amount staked with regulated operators.

Meanwhile, Andrew Rhodes, the UK Gambling Commission CEO, stated: “We are determined to protect consumers and maintain confidence in the regulated sector by taking robust, evidence-led action.

“Since April 2024, we’ve seen a tenfold increase in our disruption activity, and we intend to continue to work with a wide range of partners to build on this success.”

He added: “The illegal online market is unsafe, unfair and criminal – that is why the Commission has invested heavily in this area in recent years.

“To be even more effective in combating the illegal market,it’s vital that we have both a deep and broad understanding of how it operates, and this insight is a crucial step in building that understanding in a very complex area to research.”

Read more

Šimon Vincze: Exploring the effects of illegal gambling on the regulated industry

In his latest piece for iGaming Expert, Šimon Vincze, Head of Sustainable & Safer Gambling at CasinoGuru, tackles a controversial subject as he examines what the gambling ecosystem would look like in the absence of the illicit sector.

There has been a new type of discussion centred around the positives, or rather, the legitimacy of illegal gambling. Perhaps controversial for some, but definitely interesting. It is a question of principle, law, and morality as well as cause and effect. One thing is sure: the illegal market keeps us on our toes and forces us to collaborate in tackling it.

It reminds me of my university years when I studied international politics. During a lecture on globalisation, someone asked whether it was possible to attain complete unity. The professor responded with cold confidence that it would only happen if there were a substantial external threat, likely from outer space, naturally, aliens.

Fast forward 15 years, and I am no longer so sure about that. You don’t need to be a superintelligent extraterrestrial to understand that people are easily manipulated. Thankfully, there is no propaganda claiming that illegal gambling is here to save us. Still, you must admit that some effects of its presence push the industry forward.

How would the gambling world look if it were not so easy to play at offshore operators? I find it exciting to think about it, but I dare not draw any conclusions. However, I will most probably not be writing this article, and we would know much less about the gambling experience that is exciting, but safe(r) at the same time.

Measuring the threat

After a brief philosophical warm-up, let’s examine the size of the hydra. As I have heard people refer to it recently, because each time you shut down one illegal channel, two new ones emerge. This is especially true in social media environments that are difficult for authorities to regulate but remain popular among younger generations.

Recent global meta-analyses of over 3500 reports show that nearly 18% of adolescents have gambled in the past 12 months. I believe the actual number of those exposed to gambling or gambling features is considerably higher.

Without considering different age groups, the American Gambling Association stated in their report that 48% of respondents had bet on illegal offers. This was in 2022, while a more recent estimate from Yield Sac claims that offshore gambling accounts for 74% of US gross gambling revenue. Additionally, a recent report in Sweden suggests that channelisation rates for online casinos have fallen to between 72% and 82%.

Casino Guru’s analyses of Google searches for specific casino brands reveal that more than half of these are directed towards illegal operators in the Netherlands. Our data shows a rise in such searches following the introduction of deposit limits in October 2024. Other countries are not performing well either, with around 20% of illegal searches in the United Kingdom and Sweden, and nearly a third in Spain.

Read more

theScore handed $105,000 penalty in Ontario for player protection failures

Score Media and Gaming (theScore) has been given a CAD $105,000 (approximately €65,000) monetary penalty by the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) for failing to meet responsible gambling and player protection standards.

The AGCO has stated that the penalty is due to several alleged violations of the Registrar’s Standards for Internet Gaming.

All registered operators are required by the standards to proactively monitor player behaviour, intervene when risks of gambling-related harm are detected, and ensure employees are properly trained to support player protection.

A regulatory review by the AGCO found that a customer of theScore wagered $2.5m and lost approximately $230,000 over eight months, including approximately $100,000 in the first month.

The Commission stated that this customer showed “frequent, high-stakes play and escalating losses that clearly indicated potential gambling-related harm”, including “repeatedly requested bonuses, displayed loss-chasing behaviour, and showed signs of distress to the operator’s VIP host”.

According to the AGCO, theScore missed opportunities to appropriately intervene and reduce the potential for high-risk play, adding that the operator “relied on the patron’s self-assessments and failed to conduct meaningful responsible gambling due diligence or interventions” despite inaccurate income documentation and warning signs being shown.

“Player protections are a fundamental requirement for any gambling operator looking to conduct business in Ontario,” noted Dr Karin Schnarr, Chief Executive Officer and Registrar of the AGCO.

“When operators fail to uphold these critical safer gambling standards, they not only betray the trust of their players but also undermine the integrity of Ontario’s regulated igaming market.”

The AGCO added that theScore has the right to appeal its decision to the Licence Appeal Tribunal, which is an adjudicative tribunal independent of the AGCO and part of Tribunals Ontario.

iGaming Expert has reached out to theScore for a comment on this penalty from the AGCO.

Read more

Sweden limits slot machines in restaurants ahead of major 2026 changes

Swedish leisure and hospitality businesses have been advised of new licensing obligations governing the operation of slot machines in public venues, which see limitations on their hosting of slot machines based on annual turnover.

Under the new rules, restaurants will only be permitted to host slot machines if their annual food and beverage turnover exceeds SEK 1m (€100,000 including VAT), with one additional machine allowed for every extra SEK 250,000 in verified turnover. However, slot machine revenue must never exceed the restaurant’s dining turnover, a safeguard designed to reduce over-reliance on gaming income.

The reform follows Spelinspektionen, Sweden Gambling Inspectorate decision to end the former rules (LIFS 2018:9) applied by the Swedish Lottery Authority on casino gambling and slot machine games.

The intervention sees venue rules switched to a “modernised framework” – titled: “Regulations and General Advice on Slot Machine Gaming.”

Adopted from 1 December 2025, the new framework introduces clearer operational conditions for licensees servicing värdeautomater (slot machines) in hospitality and leisure venues, as defined under Chapter 5, Section 1 of the Gambling Act (2018:1138).

Further requirements demand that machines remain in full view of staff and under active supervision. They must be located within the licensed serving area, disconnected outside licensed serving hours, and cannot be positioned near ATMs or obscured spaces.

Similar provisions apply to bingo halls, where slot machines may only operate during bingo sessions and up to one hour before and after play, always under staff supervision.

Operators are also instructed to improve player-facing information, providing clear contact details, licence information, game fees, and references to responsible gambling resources such as Stödlinjen. Staff acting as spelombud (gaming attendants) must be trained in the Gambling Act, responsible gambling protocols, and player protection procedures.

Spelinspektionen’s Director General Camilla Rosenberg said the reforms promote “greater alignment between land-based and online gaming environments” and reflect the regulator’s ongoing efforts to modernise gambling oversight.

“These changes clarify the responsibilities of licensees and venues, ensuring slot gaming takes place in safe, supervised, and socially responsible environments,” the Inspectorate stated.

SIFS 2025:1 will come into force on 1 December 2025, formally repealing the LIFS 2018:9 framework and marking the first step in what regulators describe as “a complete renewal of Sweden’s gambling supervision entering 2026.

Prelude to sweeping 2026 reforms

In the closing months of 2025, Spelinspektionen has warned all Swedish licensees to prepare for a transformative 2026, during which several significant changes will reshape the country’s gambling governance.

Next year will bring modifications to the Gambling Act, tightening definitions of illegal gambling engagements and activities to strengthen enforcement against unlicensed operators. The government has moved to expand the scope of the Gambling Act to explicitly target illegal offshore companies operating in or accessible from Sweden.

The Ministry of Finance has endorsed a memorandum proposing the removal of the “directional criterion” from the Gambling Act — a long-standing provision that excluded games not specifically aimed at the Swedish market from domestic law. Its removal will allow authorities to pursue operators simply for allowing Swedish players to participate, regardless of geographic targeting.

Governance of Sweden’s gambling market will also be reinforced through new enforcement powers and a penalty framework granted to Spelinspektionen, giving the Inspectorate broader authority to issue sanctions, revoke licences, and increase penalties for non-compliance and conduct.

Of significance, Sweden will become the first EU nation to implement a complete ban on gambling with credit. Scheduled from 1 April 2026, all licensed operators will be prohibited from processing payments funded by credit cards, overdrafts, personal loans, or buy-now-pay-later services. The reform, championed by the government as a consumer-protection measure, aims to curb gambling-related indebtedness and strengthen responsible gambling safeguards.

The implementation of these measures will now fall under the leadership of Acting Director General Johan Röhr, who succeeded Camilla Rosenberg as head of Spelinspektionen on 1 November 2025, signaling a new phase in the Inspectorate’s direction and governance.

Read more

AFJEL intensifies media awareness of France’s black market liabilities 

France’s leading online gambling trade association AFJEL has escalated its campaign against the rise of black-market gambling, urging authorities and media to confront the growing risks of an unregulated online casino sector that continues to erode consumer protection and state revenues.

The warning marks a renewed call from AFJEL for the French government to end the structural liabilities of the country’s gambling framework by regulating online casino gaming (iCasino) — a reform the association has pushed for since the relaunch of France’s regulated online gambling market in 2011.

The trade body has now taken its campaign directly into the French mainstream press, with its PwC-commissioned study published by Le Parisien and Libération, two of the country’s most prominent national newspapers.

According to the findings, 5.4 million French players are now active on unlicensed gambling sites, surpassing the 3.5 million users in the legal market and representing a 35% surge in two years. PwC estimates that the illegal market generated €2 billion in gross gaming revenue (GGR) in 2025, causing fiscal losses of more than €1.2 billion annually.

AFJEL warns that France faces a “digital sovereignty crisis” as unregulated offshore operators — often tied to criminal networks — continue to capture consumers through aggressive social media marketing, oversized bonuses, and influencer sponsorships, all while avoiding taxes and player-safety obligations.

“These illicit platforms lure customers with outsized inducements, flood Facebook and Google with ads, and even manipulate search engines to make themselves look legitimate,” said Nicolas Béraud, CEO of Betclic Group and President of AFJEL.
“The magnitude of this problem proves that prohibition is not protection. The only solution is a regulated and controlled iCasino offer that restores trust, protects players, and ensures fair competition.”

AFJEL maintains that the continuing ban on online casinos represents a “structural liability” for France — one that undermines consumer safety and deprives the state of significant tax revenue.

“France cannot allow a sector that could be safely regulated to remain dominated by illegal sites,” Béraud continued. “We are demanding a swift and decisive response — to end this French anomaly and restore order to the market.”

The Autorité Nationale des Jeux (ANJ) — France’s gambling regulator — has adopted a cautious stance, warning that any potential opening of the iCasino market must be “carefully considered given the highly addictive nature of such products.”

While the ANJ has expanded enforcement powers and blocked over 1,000 illegal websites in 2025, AFJEL argues that regulatory measures alone are not enough.

“Despite ANJ’s commitment, the illegal market continues to grow,” Béraud added. “This is no longer a question of enforcement — it’s a question of political will.”

Read more

KSA Chair: Suicide prevention must have role in Dutch gambling’s redesign 

Dutch operators must accept “the human cost of gambling addiction” as the defining factor in strengthening consumer safeguards, according to Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) Chairman Michel Groothuizen.

Reflecting on his recent visit to Anonieme Gokkers (Gamblers Anonymous NL), Groothuizen revealed that the charity had tracked 113 suicides directly linked to gambling debt, underscoring the deep personal and social harm that can follow gambling addiction.

“If there’s one thing I took away from that evening, it’s the certainty that the appeal of gambling for former addicts will always remain and that perseverance is a daily struggle,” he said.

Dutch health authorities report 1,878 suicides annually from roughly 50,000 attempts, with loneliness, family breakdown, and mental-health issues among the key factors. Citing Swedish research, Groothuizen stressed that gambling addicts face a 15-times higher suicide risk than the general population, adding that “loneliness and lack of perspective often play a major role — in a phenomena with which gambling addicts are so familiar.”

CRUKS– 100,000 registrations

Groothuizen’s comments follow confirmation that the CRUKS (Central Register for Self-Exclusion from Gambling) system has surpassed 100,000 registrations.

While acknowledging that the number reflects a worrying level of dependency, he described the milestone as “a sign that self-protection tools are working” and providing at-risk consumers with “a tangible route back to control.”

Under Groothuizen’s leadership, the KSA is widening its focus beyond market oversight to include consumer education, early intervention, and addiction prevention as equal priorities. The regulator has launched public awareness campaigns to promote the Gambling Counter helpline and to encourage wider use of CRUKS as part of a proactive harm-reduction strategy.

The KSA continues to refine its approach to player protection and operator compliance, taking on feedback about involuntary Cruks registration and improving communication around exclusion procedures. Groothuizen emphasised that effective supervision “depends on empathy and consistency — not only enforcing the rules but understanding what drives people to harm.”

Since beginning his chairmanship, Groothuizen has prioritised stronger duty-of-care obligations for all licence holders urging operators to move beyond box-ticking compliance and demonstrate genuine accountability for player welfare. The regulator expects operators to conduct one-to-one checks with customers, assess risk behaviours in real time, and ensure customer service teams receive targeted training to identify signs of vulnerability and potential harm.

This renewed focus, Groothuizen said, reflects the KSA’s intent to build a culture of proactive intervention, where operators act as the first line of defence in preventing gambling addiction and related harms.

A call for holistic support

The Netherlands’ emerging gambling regime aims to bridge regulation, prevention, and recovery through a coordinated support network involving health bodies, addiction charities, and state agencies. Groothuizen said the KSA will intensify cooperation with organisations such as 113 Suicide Prevention and Anonieme Gokkers, ensuring that gamblers in crisis are not left isolated.

“Regulation alone cannot restore lives,” he concluded. “Our responsibility is to ensure that every person who struggles with gambling knows there is help, hope, and a path forward.”

Groothuizen further believes that compassion and understanding must guide the next phase of revisions to the Remote Gambling Act (KOA), which will be undertaken by the incoming government. He urged policymakers to look beyond political ideology and ensure that any reform “carries the ultimate objective of protecting those at risk of suicide and the most vulnerable from gambling — the greatest human cost of any gambling regime.”

Read more

Malta backed against a wall as EU court closes in on Bill 55 dilution 

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has revealed the significant lengths that EU Courts could extend to in a bid to strengthen action against Malta operators.

It’s a case that may shift the tide in terms of governance and regulation across Europe and Malta – with EU courts taking on the regulatory ringfencing of Bill 55.

According to the Advocate General (AG) of the ECJ, the framework could shift to dilute the effectiveness of Bill 55 when it comes to Malta safeguarding its domestic operators.

In a significant referral, the Advocate General has put forward the case to enable international authorities to freeze the assets of Malta-based companies in the event of local breaches.

The Advocate General has outlined that the European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) Regulation could well be utilised to enforce asset freezes

The focus on the bill was enhanced by the case of the two Austrian players who filed claims against Malta-based and licensed firms. A Maltese court sought to overrule the decision of an Austrian court over whether gaming operators in Malta should compensate Austrian players.

Courts in Austria both backed the players, with the Austrian framework currently citing any overseas operator as being illegal in the country if it does not hold a local licence.

Maltese courts and the two operators emphasised the free market and EU laws enabling free movements of services, illegitimising the original Austrian decision in the eyes of the Maltese legal system.

The MGA has consistently argued that the bill is in place to protect Maltese operators from “baseless legal challenges”.

Malta’s regulatory body has previously stated that it wants to ensure “its licensees are allowed to operate where they have a justifiable legal reason to do so, and always in a compliant manner.”

The latest statement from the Advocate General does underpin growing tension from Europe towards the way Bill 55 is utilised as it looks to change the framework around its implementation.

The Advocate General is seeking to implement tweaks to the bill to strengthen the ability of domestic EU courts to ensure their citizens can take legislative action against Maltese operators.

Central to the recommended changes is the ability of EU courts to be allowed to freeze the assets of Maltese gambling companies to aid debt recovery and bypass Bill 55.

Some of the most vocal disdain towards Bill 55 has come from Germany, with the national regulator, the GGL consistently calling for a reassessment of the impact it has on the sector.

Previously, the GGL has stated: “We are of the opinion that this law should not be compatible with European requirements for the recognition of decisions (Regulation (EU) 1215/2002).

“However, the final assessment of this question is not the responsibility of the GGL. We have informed the federal states of our assessment and are otherwise in contact with the relevant authorities.”

The court battles over the future of Bill 55 now look set to rumble on into 2026, in what could prove to be a decisive year for the future of the regulation and its impact on the gambling industry.

Read more

Spain lays out player protection roadmap amid industry concerns

The Spanish government is moving forward with its plans to overhaul player protection measures for online gambling users.

The Directorate General of the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) is seeking to establish a centralised deposit limit system for players, set at €600 per day, €1,500 per week and €3,000 per month.

This would shake up current measures, which requires each operator to manage limits independently.

The regulatory project began in 2023 and is still pending final approval.

The plans include the ability for users to reduce limits or eliminate them, although the changes will not take effect until three days have passed and can only be modified once per quarter.

Alongside deposit limits, the DGOJ is also spearheading a new approach to monitoring problem gambling behaviours as part of the Royal Decree of gambling environments.

The regulator is working on the development of an AI-led responsible gambling algorithm that aims to trace live variable indicators of problem gambling risks.

The algorithm, which the DGOJ’s Directorate General Mikel Arana expects to be completed by March 2026, will be mandatory for all operators in the Spanish market. The DGOJ believes the project will make it the first European regulator to apply AI to customer interventions around gambling harm.

Balancing regulation and player experience

Although player protection measures are essential for operating within a regulated market, industry experts in Spain have warned that changes must be complemented by an efficient player experience.

Speaking at June’s Gaming in Spain conference, Jorge Hinojosa, Director General of Jdigital, said: “[Player protection reforms] have not been complemented, in my opinion, by policies to keep the market more competitive.”

Hinojosa emphasised that there needs to be recognition that operators, the DGOJ and the wider industry have a “common job” to ensure that Spain develops a stronger gambling market through measures such as allowing new modalities like live casino.

Esther Martin-Ortega, Head of Public Affairs and Sustainability at Flutter, echoed these sentiments, reiterating the need to keep the regulated Spanish market attractive given the looming threat of the black market – especially for young players using social media.

“There are influencers on gaming, and they always find a way of putting the advertising in front of you, and then they get the visibility they need,” she said.

“We have a generation of smartphone natives who check what’s going on on social media. Access for a consumer to the black market is much broader than ever.”

Read more

Spribe issues clarification following UK suspension 

Spribe OÜ has clarified the circumstances surrounding the suspension of its UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) licence.

The games developer is assured that the issue stems from a technical lapse as opposed to any operational wrongdoing.

Speaking to iGaming Expert, the Tallinn and Tbilisi-headquartered games developer revealed it is undertaking “diligent and as expeditious” efforts to resolve the matter.

Spribe has held a UK remote gambling software licence since 2020, with no interruptions. However, yesterday’s enforcement by UKGC determined that Spribe had been hosting casino games on behalf of operators without the appropriate remote casino game host licence.

Under Section 33 of the Gambling Act 2005, it is a criminal offence to provide gambling facilities in Great Britain without the correct authorisation. The Commission has ordered that all hosting activity must “strictly stop” until the appropriate permissions have been secured, reiterating its “strong approach to unlicensed gambling activity” and its expectation of “the highest level of compliance and integrity from licensees.”

In a statement issued to iGamingExpert, Spribe acknowledged the regulator’s position, describing the issue as “a technical licensing gap” that was not recognised during its original 2020 application.

“Spribe applied for and was given a remote gambling software licence in 2020. However, our business model also requires a remote casino game host licence. That is a technical licensing issue that was not recognised in the original application process in 2020.”

The company confirmed that it is now preparing a licence variation application to add the required permissions for remote casino game hosting and is working “urgently to ensure full technical and legal compliance.”

Best known for its flagship crash game Aviator — recognised as one of iGaming’s most popular titles, Spribe’s wider portfolio includes Mines, Dice and Hi-Lo. Its content is distributed through several major UK-licensed operators, including Paddy Power, 888casino, BetVictor, Genting Casino and BetMGM.

Spribe also sought to reassure its clients and consumers, confirming that the suspension “does not affect players’ ability to access their accounts or withdraw funds” and that there is “no evidence of consumer harm” related to its UK activities.

Closing its statement, Spribe reaffirmed its commitment to compliance, transparency, and software integrity across all regulated markets.

“Spribe has always complied with all regulatory requirements of the gambling software licence issued to us in the UK during five years of service to the British market. We are hopeful that the Commission can approve the application promptly and that we can resume business in the UK market as soon as possible.”

The UKGC’s action highlights its increasing scrutiny of B2B suppliers and technical providers, signalling that enforcement will no longer be confined to consumer-facing operators as the regulator intensifies oversight across the wider UK gambling ecosystem.

Read more