MGA issues vehement defence against EU 

The MGA has asserted its belief that Bill 55 does not shield Maltese operators from EU courts following the escalation of the dispute between the EU and Malta.

A formal notice was filed by the European Commission questioning whether the bill complied with European regulations. However, the MGA has staunchly defended the bill, emphasising that it doesn’t impose a blanket ban on enforcing European judgments against Maltese-licensed gaming companies.

The MGA emphasised that as a Member State, Malta has “consistently maintained the position that its gaming regulatory framework is in line with the principles established by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)”. Specifically around competition laws and the fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

Consequently, the MGA reiterates that Article 56A of the Gaming Act does not introduce new or separate grounds for refusing the recognition or enforcement of judgments beyond those already set out in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012. Rather, it codifies into law Malta’s long-standing public policy on gaming matters. The MGA will continue to support the Maltese Government in engaging in open and constructive dialogue with the European Commission.

A letter issued by the EC stated that it considers the Maltese legislation as a shield from litigation from other EU states, something the MGA vehemently denies.

An MGA statement defended the bill as the regulatory body underpinned its belief that any unjustified restrictions on the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment within the EU internal market run directly counter to the case law of the CJEU.

The MGA concluded its defence by outlining that Article 56A of the Gaming Act “does not introduce new or separate grounds for refusing the recognition or enforcement of judgments beyond those already set out in Regulation (EU) 1215/2012”.

They described it instead as codifying into law Malta’s long-standing public policy on gaming matters.

The bill was brought back into focus in recent times as Maltese courts ruled in two separate cases that Austrian courts do not have the power to dictate whether gaming operators in Malta compensate Austrian players.

This is in spite of courts in Austria both backing the players, with the Austrian framework currently citing any overseas operator as being illegal in the country.

Maltese courts and the two operators emphasised the free market and EU Laws enabling free movements of services, illegitimising the original Austrian decision in the eyes of the Maltese legal system.

Read more

Swedish regulator continues legal battle with Svenska Spel

There’s set to be a new chapter in the longstanding legal battle between the Swedish gambling regulator Spelinspektionen and the operator Svenska Spel Sport & Casino AB.

The regulator has appealed a court decision that saw the operator successfully challenge a SEK 100m penalty fee (approximately £7.7m) for duty of care failures.

Spelinspektionen is appealing the decision of the Administrative Court in Linköping to the Court of Appeal in Jönköping as it believes it conflicts with previous court decisions, as well as the authority’s scope of the duty of care assessment.

Administrative Court sides with Svenska Spel

Back in March last year, Svenska Spel was issued a warning and a penalty fee by the Swedish authority following an audit of the operator in 2021, in which the authority stated that the operator had not fulfilled its obligations under Chapter 14, Section 1 of the Gambling Act, specifically the duty of care supervision.

Spelinspektionen said Svenska Spel didn’t work actively or proactively enough to protect ten customers who showed signs of potential gambling harm between 17 October and 17 December 2021, issuing a warning and a penalty fee of SEK 100m as a result.

Appealing to the administrative court, Svenska Spel said it did meet the requirements of Chapter 14, Section 1 of the Gambling Act, continuously monitors its customers’ gambling behaviour and takes action to help players reduce their gambling when necessary.

The operator added that as the constitution doesn’t state which measures should be taken and when, its own measures should therefore “be considered sufficient when examining whether there were grounds for intervention”.

Siding with the operator, the Administrative Court disagreed with Spelinspektionen‘s assessment based on the “legality principle”, which states that an authority may only take measures that are supported by the legal order and that it must be “sufficiently clear” what individuals must do to avoid a penalty.

Assessed in a ‘completely different way’

The Administrative Court’s judgment can be appealed by Spelinspektionen to the Court of Appeal, which is what the regulator has decided to do, arguing that the Administrative Court’s decision conflicts with previous court decisions and the authority’s scope of the duty of care assessment.

In a statement, the authority said: “The Administrative Court’s judgment incorrectly assumes that the duty of care under Chapter 14, Section 1 of the Gambling Act does not contain any concrete directives for action. The Swedish Gambling Authority considers that the provision places clear requirements on a licensee.

“A licensee must promptly take active measures to protect players against excessive gambling. A licensee must also continuously monitor extensive gambling and, if necessary, take measures at the same pace as the gambling occurs. A licensee must also voluntarily limit gambling to counteract the damage that excessive gambling can cause.

“The customers examined, one of whom was a young person, have gambled extensively and lost significant amounts over a short period of time. Over two months, the losses have amounted to between SEK 260,000 and SEK 600,000. In some cases, the losses correspond to a large part of the customer’s taxable annual income.

“The company’s measures have mainly consisted of warnings and informative messages. The Swedish Gambling Authority assesses that Svenska Spel Sport & Casino has neither continuously followed up on the customers examined nor taken necessary and individualised measures to limit their gambling.

“The Swedish Gambling Authority believes that the Administrative Court has assessed Svenska Spel Sport & Casino in a completely different way than other sanctioned licensees. The Swedish Gambling Authority is therefore appealing the Administrative Court’s ruling to the Court of Appeal.”

‘Greater clarity’

The interpretation of the duty of care under Chapter 14, Section 1 of the Gambling Act has already been raised by Svenska Spel, who called for clarification regarding its interpretation when they reacted to the Administrative Court’s decision earlier this month.

“It is gratifying that the Administrative Court upholds our appeal and overturns the decision of the Swedish Gambling Authority,” commented Fredrik Wastenson, CEO and Business Area Manager at Svenska Spel Sport & Casino AB.

“We appealed because we believe that the penalty fee is disproportionate in relation to the shortcomings and because there is a need to create greater clarity in the interpretation of the duty of care. We believe that the authority may only take measures that are supported by the legal order, the so-called principle of legality, which the court has also stated.”

Compliance

Spelinspektionen has also recently undertaken a review of three operators – AB Trotting and Galloping, Svenska Spel and Lotto Direct Limited – who will be checked for compliance with the provision on the notification obligation according to Chapter 11, section three of the country’s Gambling Act.

Chapter 11, section three of the Gambling Act requires licence holders to notify the gambling authority if they become aware of changes concerning their application or registration of a gambling agent.

The gambling authority stated that once the review has been completed, the results will be published with a link to a decision if intervention is necessary.

Read more

BGC names CopyBet latest member during fight against tax increase

CopyBet has joined the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), the standards body that represents around 90% of the regulated gambling industry in the UK.

Launched in 2016, CopyBet allows users to copy the bets made by others on the platform, which also includes tipsters rankings based on both their recent betting performance and profitability.

The firm, which operates under a UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) licence and also holds a Class B bookmaker license in Cyprus, supports both pre-match and in-play betting markets.

Grainne Hurst, CEO of the BGC, stated: “We are thrilled to welcome CopyBet as a member of our expanding and diverse membership at the BGC. We look forward to collaborating with CopyBet, and all our members, as we work together to raise standards across the industry.”

Integrity is key
The news comes not long after Coybet was welcomed by the International Betting Integrity Association (IBIA) as its newest member.

CopyBet now feeds integrity data from its online betting platform into IBIA’s global monitoring network, joining more than 80 companies operating over 140 sports betting brands with a total handle of $300bn per year.

The operator has been working to enhance its brand visibility over recent years, including through several sports sponsorships. This association with sports betting may have influenced the firm in deciding to take a more active role in integrity.

Currently, the brand is the official front-of-shirt sponsor of EFL’s Queens Park Rangers FC, as well as the partner of several Cyprian football teams such as AEK Larnaca, PΑC Omonia 29M, Enosis Neon Paralimni and Aris Limassol.

It also made its racing debut last year as sponsor of the November Racing Weekend at Ascot. Meanwhile, Irish jockey Jonathan Burke is also a CopyBet brand ambassador.

Anton Ivanov, Business Development Director of CopyBet UK, said of the firm joining the BGC: “CopyBet is pleased to announce its membership of the BGC. We look forward to working with other members to help raise industry standards further and create a culture of safer betting.”

Black market concerns loom
As the BGC continues to prioritise player safety, earlier this month, the group commissioned research which has sparked several fears that a tax increase on online gambling in the UK would make customers turn to unregulated betting sites.

Remote activities are currently hit at 21% of operator profit, while General Betting Duty is taxed at 15% of profit and Pool Betting Duty at 15% of net stake receipts. The rate of the potential new Betting & Gaming Duty (BGD) is not yet clear.

The BGC warned that this shift could not only fail to generate more tax revenue but also jeopardise player safety, as well as severely impact the financial health of sports, particularly horse racing.

Hurst said: “It’s clear it will not raise more tax, it simply risks forcing huge numbers of customers out of the regulated market, with its world leading standards on player safety, into the arms of the growing, illegal, unregulated and unsafe gambling black market online.”

“Any tax rises would make a mockery of the Government’s growth strategy and be catastrophic for horseracing, which is already facing a bleak financial outlook.”

Read more

Regulators in Louisiana & Mississippi send C&D orders to sweeps casinos

The Louisiana Gaming Control Board is the latest regulatory agency taking action against the operation of unlicensed offshore wagering and sweepstakes casino platforms.

The board is taking a stance against the unlicensed operators by issuing a slew of cease and desist orders for circumventing Louisiana’s gaming laws and regulations. The regulator recently sent Bovada a cease and desist letter before issuing over 40 additional orders.

Louisiana’s gaming regulator did not disclose the other operators that received the orders.

“These actions send a clear message,” said Louisiana Gaming Control Board Chairman Christopher B. Hebert. “Louisiana will not tolerate illegal operators who put our citizens at risk and undermine the fairness and integrity of our gaming industry. We will continue to use every enforcement tool available to protect the public and uphold the law.”

The Louisiana Gaming Control Board sent cease and desist orders after Gov. Jeff Landry vetoed a bill to ban the operati..

Read more

Tennis authorities say bookmakers have responsibility to help curb online hate

The Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) and International Tennis Federation (ITF) are highly concerned about the amount of players are getting online following a season-wide report.

The duo are now calling on the betting industry to take action, with the study’s findings – taken from Signify Group’s Threat Matrix service – detailing that angry gamblers sent 40% of all detected abuse across the year. Meanwhile, 10 prolific accounts (majority being angry-gambler related) were responsible for 12% of abuse.

Action-orientated approach
Signify uses AI and human analysts and operates across all the major social media platforms in over 40 languages. All players competing in WTA Tour and ITF World Tennis Tour events are covered by the service.

Jonathan Hirshler, Signify CEO, said: “This unique dataset, covering all players across international tennis tours and Grand Slams, illustrates that a relatively small number of accounts are responsible for a significant proportion of prolific abuse and trolling.”

Between January – December last year,1.6 million posts and comments were analysed by the service, with analysts verifying around 8,000 posts/comments sent from 4,200 accounts as abusive, violent or threatening.

The group assured that action has been taken against the most serious and prolific of these, including 15 accounts escalated to law enforcement. A lot of the abuse players receive has been thrust into the spotlight following the French Open this weekend.

A BBC Sport report has highlighted the extent of abuse received by Katie Boulder, 39th ranked women’s singles player, who believes that a lot of online hate she received after losing a tie-break at the French Open came from people who had lost bets on her game.

Looking back over 2024, Signify’s data shows that 458 players faced direct threats or abusive messages. A significant portion (26%) was directed at just five players, while 97 high-activity accounts were behind 23% of the total abuse recorded.

Hirshler continued: “While this is deeply distressing for the athletes targeted, it means that we are able to be even more focused working with the platforms to ensure successful take down, support the tennis bodies to drive law enforcement intervention for the most egregious accounts and work with event security teams to ensure prolific abusers are unable to attend tournaments.”

Of the aforementioned 15 cases, three of these were submitted to the FBI and 12 to other national law enforcement bodies. Account details have also been shared with event security teams to ban individuals from access to venues/tickets.

Constructive dialogue is key
To stop this type of abuse occurring in the first place, tennis authorities argue that betting operators, social media platforms, governing bodies, players and law enforcers all have a responsibility to make the online space safer.

A spokesperson for the ITF emphasised: “We hope the gambling industry responds constructively to our call for more action on their part.”

The Threat Matrix service also looks at abusive direct messages, emails or letters and 56 reports of this type of communication were reported by 28 players – angry gamblers were 77% of these.

The service is currently upscaling to include social media moderation, which hides online hate in real time across the majority of platforms.

Jessica Pegula, Member of the WTA Players’ Council, concluded: “Online abuse is unacceptable, and something that no player should have to endure. I welcome the work that the WTA and ITF are doing with Threat Matrix to identify and take action against the abusers, whose behavior is so often linked to gambling.

“But it’s not enough on its own. It’s time for the gambling industry and social media companies to tackle the problem at its source and act to protect everyone facing these threats.”

Online abuse in tennis has been an ongoing issue for some time since the rise of social media over the past decade. In 2024, Sportradar, a firm which works closely with many betting operators, got involved in tennis’ athlete protection initiatives via a deal with Tennis Data Innovations (TDI) and the ATP Tour.

The firm launched Safe Sport, which is a service now utilised to address online abuse targeting professional athletes through the use of artificial intelligence moderation, education and investigation. It was made available to the top 250 ATP singles players and the top 50-ranked doubles players on a free and opt-in basis.

Concerns over the extent of online harassment some athletes face as a result of lost bets are nothing new. Over in the US, this month Signify also teamed up with the NCAA to study online abuse sparked by sports betting.

The pair used the 2025 men’s and women’s basketball tournaments to identify and study targeted online abuse directed at student-athletes, coaches, officials and committee members. In looking at a total of 1 million posts and comments, 54,096 flagged for potential abuse by AI – 3,161 of which were then officially identified as abusive.

Read more

Church of Romania sits at national problem gambling roundtable

The Church of Romania is taking an active part in shaping the country’s national problem gambling strategy.

Olivia Nicoleta Vișan, Programme Coordinator at the Filantropia Federation of the Romanian Patriarchate, and Archimandrite Casian Filip, Vicar of the Diocese of Maramureș and Sătmar, both took part in a roundtable discussion that launched the “National Strategy for the Prevention and Treatment of Gambling Addiction”.

Led by the Romanian Committee for Culture, Communication, and Media (CCCM), the meeting was also attended by representatives from the National Agency for Drug and Addiction Policies (ANPCDA), as well as the regulator – the National Gambling Office (ONJN).

Besides speaking on behalf of the Church, Archimandrite Filip contributed to the conversation by leveraging his experience as a specialised advisor in the field of addictions and behavioural disorders.

The bottom line of the meeting was to devise a strategy on how to effectively coordinate between ministries, politicians, authorities, the clergy, experts, NGOs, and the gambling sector, when subsidising efforts to combat problem gambling rates in the country.

Cristian Niculescu-Țăgârlaș, Chair of the Senate’s CCCM, said: “I believe the cultural and educational dimension of the Strategy is essential. The Church, culture, media, and education can become powerful tools for prevention and support for young people and vulnerable groups.”

Speaking to the various stakeholders present at the event, President of the ONJN, Vlad Cristian Soare, reminded that the regulator collects around €11m in tax per year from the gambling sector, and reinstated its commitment – now strengthened by the new strategy – to direct these funds into prevention, self-exclusion, and gambling harm research initiatives.

“For me, these are a priority. I want an active, transparent and responsible ONJN, and for this we need everyone: public authorities, specialists, organisers and civil society. Only together can we transform social responsibility into a reality and provide support to those who have real need,” Soare added.

Archimandrite Filip fully welcomed both the CCCM’s and the ONJN’s extended hands, adding that the Church plays a vital role in community wellbeing, guiding individuals and their families through hardships.

Wider reforms on the way
Gambling in Romania is currently at a crossroads, with the Save Romania Party (USR) pushing for a total restructuring of regulations, one of which being an updated self-exclusion framework.

Matters reached a boiling point earlier this year when an independent audit of the ONJN found that the regulator failed to collect around €900m in taxes between 2019 and 2023.

Their audit further unveiled that the self-exclusion system that is meant to be managed centrally by the ONJN was not properly implemented across licensed gambling operators, leading to serious concerns about the actual rate of problem gamblers in the country.

The subsequent fallout saw a change in ONJN leadership, with former President Gheorghe-Gabriel Gheorghe stepping down and Soare taking over his duties.

USR is now pushing for an abolishment of the ONJN as a result, and a transfer of supervision duties to the National Agency for Fiscal Administration (ANAF).

On top of that there are also calls to increase the turnover tax for gambling operators to 20%, which are currently being reviewed by Parliament.

Read more

Casino Days hit with AGCO penalty for ‘deceptive’ bonus offer

The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) has sanctioned Casino Days for promoting a deceptive bonus on its platform.

In a statement, the regulator confirmed it had hit Well Played Media, Unipessoal LDA, the operator of Casino Days, with a $54,000 financial penalty following a complaint from a customer that more than $8,500 had been confiscated by Casino Days from his account.

The subsequent investigation discovered a welcome bonus offer that allegedly encouraged high-risk behaviour and failed to disclose key terms properly.

According to the AGCO, the offer, which promised new players up to $2,000, carried a number of stipulations that had to be met to receive the bonus.

Players had to deposit $2,000 of their own money, wager $70,000, with each wager at or under $5, and complete all wagering requirements within seven days.

As a result, the AGCO’s analysis revealed that the average player would lose $3,640 trying to earn the $2,000 bonus. In addition, investigators found that some of the terms of the offer were difficult to find and “buried behind multiple links on the site”.

Dr Karin Schnarr, CEO and registrar of the AGCO, commented: “An offer that requires a player to sustain substantial losses for a perceived benefit is not a fair offer. This penalty sends a clear signal that we will not hesitate to take action against operators who fail to meet their obligations to protect Ontario players.”

AGCO rules state that licensed operators must not offer bonus promotions that encourage harmful gambling behaviour and fail to disclose key conditions appropriately. They also must refrain from offering bonuses that cannot be reasonably attained without significant gambling losses.

“Player protection is a non-negotiable priority for the AGCO. We expect operators to be truthful and transparent about their promotions, and we also require them to ensure that those promotions do not encourage reckless or harmful patterns of play,” added Schnarr.

Casino Days has the right to appeal the decision to the independent Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT).

Strong regulatory action

The penalty handed to Casino Days continues the AGCO’s strong action against malpractice within its jurisdiction.

In April, the Great Canadian Casino Resort Toronto was given a $120,000 penalty for failing to recognise alleged collusion between a group of casino patrons and two table game dealers.

Meanwhile, BetMGM Canada also fell foul of the AGCO’s rules when it was discovered that two of its marketing affiliates had offered cash incentives for new customers who signed up and placed a deposit.

The AGCO’s regulations expressly forbid operators from publicly advertising sign-up bonuses or any other inducements designed to attract new players.

BetMGM acknowledged that its affiliates had engaged in prohibited marketing and paid a fine of $110,000.

Read more

Tabcorp getting double grief over pub plans and VIP promotions

Tabcorp has been hit by a AU$4m (€2.3m) penalty for breaching Australian spam laws while also facing political scrutiny for a recent plan to shake up how it works with the country’s pub industry.

The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) issued the penalty after Tabcorp sent 5,700 marketing messages to its VIP programme customers, something which the regulator states broke Australian spam laws.

Australia’s Spam Act 2023 requires businesses to have customer consent before sending out any marketing messages. The ACMA states that enforcing this requirement is one of its key priorities, having issued AU$16.9m (€9.6m) worth of penalties for breaches of the Act over the past 18 months.

The ACMA’s investigation found that 2,598 SMS and WhatsApp messages sent to VIP customers between 1 February-1 May 2024 did not have an option to unsubscribe, 3,148 other messages did not contain ‘adequate sender information’, and 11 SMS messages sent between 15 February-29 April 2024 were also sent without consent.

“This is the first time the ACMA has investigated and found spam breaches in a gambling VIP programme,” said Authority Member Samantha Yorke.

“These programmes often involve personalised messages offering incentives such as bonus bets, deposit matching, rebates and offers of tickets to sporting and other events.

“The gambling industry needs to understand that spam laws apply to all direct marketing — whether it’s generic campaigns or personalised messages.”

Pub plans get political
Tabcorp is also facing pressure from the political scene, although the most vocal political voice around its newly unveiled plans to change how it works with the Australian pub industry is a key gambling law reform proponent – so his comments are not anything new.

Quoted in an article in The Guardian, which he shared on X, independent Australian Senator and former member of the Australian national rugby union team, Dave Pocock, argued that gaming firms have been ‘emboldened’ by government inaction.

He was referring to Tabcorp’s plans to replace payments made to Australian pubs and hotels which include its gaming machines in their venues with a promotions scheme designed to attract more customers to said venues.

“The Albanese Govt’s failure to act almost 2 yrs after the Murphy review’s 31 reccs were released means companies like Tabcorp are emboldened & exploiting regulatory loopholes on things that cause huge harm like gambling inducements,” Pocock wrote on X, adding that these inducements are ‘hurting’ Australians.

The Albanese Govt’s failure to act almost 2 yrs after the Murphy review’s 31 reccs were released means companies like Tabcorp are emboldened & exploiting regulatory loopholes on things that cause huge harm like gambling inducements, hurting more 🇦🇺shttps://t.co/tsYZPuNbvJ

— David Pocock (@DavidPocock) June 15, 2025

The Murphy review cited by Pocock was, as its name suggests, a review of Austrian gambling regulations and legislation conducted by the late Peta Murphy MP, also a proponent of gaming law reform. This review made 31 recommendations, including a ban on inducements.

However, the government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese temporarily shelved the review’s recommendations ahead of the May general election. Some commentators believed this was due to the government not wanting to risk a potential public showdown with the industry prior to voters going to the polls.

With the Albanese government now firmly back in the driving seat, having won the election with 34.5% of the vote, reform proponents now want to see real change at the federal level around how Australia regulates betting marketing, promotions and player protection.

Pocock summarised a viewpoint held by many politicians: “Research shows inducements have contributed enormously to children and young people believing that gambling is a risk-free and normal part of enjoying sport, which is the exact association we should be working to break.”

Read more

Gambling Harm Prevention Pioneers awarded King’s MBE 

Nicola Jaques, Dominic Harrison and Matt Gaskell, three of Britain’s leading figureheads in gambling harms prevention have been awarded MBEs in the King’s Birthday Honours.

Each recipient has played a distinct role in pushing forward new thinking and structural change in how British authorities view and tackle problem gambling harms. The trios work spans clinical delivery, lived experience advocacy and governance core pillars in the wider effort to reduce gambling harm across British communities.

Jaques: lived experience to understand biggest harms
Nicola Jaques, Chair of the GambleAware Lived Experience Council, was recognised for her work amplifying the voices of those directly affected by gambling addiction. As chair, she has helped establish lived experience as a cornerstone of national policy development and programme design.

“I am deeply honoured to receive the MBE on behalf of GambleAware’s Lived Experience Council,” she said. “This award is a powerful acknowledgement of the wider gambling harms sector’s role in driving meaningful change.”

Jaques underlined the importance of education, systemic reform and collaboration with those impacted.

She also singled out the Beacon Counselling Trust and the National Gambling Support Network for adopting whole-family and community-based models of care. “Supporting education programmes and encouraging system change will always be at the heart of my commitment to this cause,” she added.

Harrison: Pioneer of GamCare comprehensive support
Dominic Harrison, a trustee of GamCare and Chair of its Audit Committee, was also recognised for his long-standing contribution to the sector. With senior roles in Ladbrokes and Gala Coral on his CV, Harrison brought commercial acumen and oversight to one of the UK’s most critical support providers.

“Dominic has brought compassion and common sense to the charity’s vital work,” said GamCare Chair Margot Daly. “This recognition is also a tribute to the frontline teams who deliver support services every day.”

Harrison’s tenure has coincided with a sharp increase in GamCare’s capacity, now reaching tens of thousands of individuals annually through its national helpline, treatment network and digital tools.

Gaskell: The Architect of NHS gambling clinics
Matt Gaskell, Consultant Psychologist and founder of the NHS Northern Gambling Service, was awarded for pioneering the NHS’s direct intervention model. Since 2019, he has expanded the service to six hubs across the North of England, integrating clinical care into the public health system.

“This award recognises that gambling harm is a public health crisis of our time,” Gaskell said. “I dedicate this to all those affected by preventable gambling-related harm.”

Gaskell, who also advises government and helped author national clinical guidelines, has been vocal in calling out the commercial practices of the gambling sector, arguing for regulation that puts population health above profit.

Dr Sara Munro, Chief Executive of Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, praised Gaskell’s contribution. “Matt’s work has saved lives. He has been instrumental in building the NHS Northern Gambling Service into a model of care and a driver of policy reform.”

Gambling Harms enters new strategy
The honours come as the UK’s gambling harm framework enters a transition period. Since April, a new national strategy has been rolled out under the joint direction of the NHS and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID), aimed at scaling public health-led interventions.

However, the long-term role of third-party services—including charities and community-led groups—remains unresolved. The NHS and OHID have yet to publish a formal proposal detailing how non-NHS providers will be governed or funded under the new system.

As policy shifts continue, the work of Jaques, Harrison and Gaskell underscores the critical role of joined-up leadership combining clinical rigour, governance and lived experience to tackle one of the UK’s most pressing behavioural health challenges.

Read more

Swedish government plans expanded credit ban

The Swedish government is pursuing the expansion of its ban on gambling with credit in a bid to enhance player protection in the country.

Under the new legislation, which would come into force on 1 April 2026, licensed operators will be prohibited from accepting any bet financed with borrowed money, whether through credit cards or third-party credit providers.

Sweden’s government said the proposal seeks to build on the “limited scope” of the current credit ban within the country’s Gambling Act, which only covers credits offered or provided directly by gaming companies and gambling agents.

“You simply should not bet with borrowed money,” Sweden’s Finance Minister, Niklas Wykman, told reporters at a press conference.

Expanded legislation

Implementation of a full credit ban remains somewhat challenging, however, as a result of the new framework, licensees and gambling agents must not enable players to enter into credit agreements with other parties when purchasing the game, for example, by linking to creditors in connection with online gambling.

In addition, they must not accept gambling bets if they know that the player is funding their gambling with credit, or accept payment by a credit card if it can immediately be determined at the time of purchase that it is a credit card payment.

These stipulations, which are set to be reviewed by the legislative council, will apply to both online and retail gaming.

Alongside the new protections, licensees will also be required to take measures to counteract gambling on credit through means such as information signs in stores or clear messages online.

Swedish regulator targets influencers

Elsewhere in Sweden, the country’s gambling authority, Spelinspektionen, has conducted a major crackdown on influencers promoting illegal gambling operators.

The regulatory body initiated supervision against several influencers who were found to have marketed illegal gambling through their online channels, predominantly on the video-sharing platform Twitch.

Spelinspektionen explained in a statement that the action forms part of a wider operational plan to focus on “young people’s gambling and illegal gambling” in 2025.

“The Swedish Gambling Authority will continue to conduct supervision against influencers and other actors who conduct or promote illegal gambling under the Gambling Act,” the regulator added.

Following the supervision, Spelinspektionen confirmed that the influencers in question had stopped marketing illegal gambling.

Read more