Related posts

Congressman wants facial recognition to verify age of bettors, predictions users

Heavily-criticised GSGB reveals problem gambling rate in UK for 2025 was 2.4%

1xCare names Advisory Committee expert line-up

4 comments

scott October 31, 2024 - 12:26 pm
Appreciate Dan's context on this. Helps make sense of an extremely dense document.
Steve Hoare October 31, 2024 - 12:49 pm
On stages around the world, I constantly hear panelists talking about taking the stigma out of gambling and how creating a stigma around problem gambling stops players seeking help. Surely the "de-normalisation of gambling" as advocated for in this paper, just builds the stigma?
Rob Mabbett November 1, 2024 - 9:05 am
As per, Dan's analysis is spot on. A more cynical mind may feel that the prevalence of gambling harm is being exaggerated to justify the ask for exorbitant amounts of funding whilst concurrently the campaign to exclude expert voices from the collective effort to reduce harm is aimed at securing a greater slice of that pie. Time will tell, if our treatment services become overrun in the near future and we are at capacity with all the NHS clinics bursting at the seams, then what can I say, I'm sorry!
Steve Hoare November 1, 2024 - 3:31 pm
Tbh I would just like to see more balance.... and that will involve speaking to the industry. The whole concept of 'research on the gambling industry without speaking to the gambling industry' makes absolutely no sense to me.
Add Comment