SBC News

Zambia, Kenya and a tale of fluctuating excise duties 

The fluctuation of excise duty tax on the gambling industry has been a key topic across Africa in the past year.

In Zambia, there has been continued rallying against the touted introduction of a 10% excise duty tax on all betting stakes.

It prompted an application from BetPawa and Betway to halt the tax, however, this was dismissed by the country’s Constitutional Court.

At the heart of the appeal against the introduction of the tax were claims that it breached section 7 of the customs Excise (Amendment) Act No. 11 of 2025. Objections included an alleged lack of transparency, inadequate public consultation, and severe economic impact.

Furthermore, they also claimed that it was excessive, ambiguous, unimplementable and financially unsustainable, warning that it could have key impacts on their ability to operate in the country in the future.

Nonetheless, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) underpinned that the excise duty stems from consumption by bettors and not operators, affirming that it had engaged with stakeholders on the decision.

Following this, the operators looked to implement an interim injunction to stop enforcement of the excise duty pending the full hearing of their constitutional petition.

ZRA countered that the tax was lawful and implementable in its current form. The organisation emphasised that any interference at this stage would be an encroachment on its statutory duty.

Seemingly cementing a future for excise duty in Zambia, the Court decided that the petitioners failed to demonstrate a sufficiently serious constitutional issue to justify suspending the law at this stage.

Of note in Zambia is the 10% figure, which is intriguing as it sits between Kenya’s previous 15% threshold and the figure it was recently lowered to, 5%.

When lowering the levels of tax, Kenya also undertook a subtle but significant change in the way it takes excise duty, instead of taxing when a bet is placed, like Zambia, they opted to take it at the point in which funds are transferred from a mobile‐money wallet to a betting account.

The country’s chairman of the Finance Committee, MP Kimani Kuria, said: “When you are placing a bet, the current taxation regime is that when you have money in your mobile money account and then you transfer that money to the wallet of a betting company, the time of charging excise duty is when you place a bet.

“There are so many entities operating virtually, some outside the country from which we are not able to get this excise duty from them. This now means that every time a Kenyan transfers money from their mobile wallet to the wallet of the betting company, then that’s the time the excise duty is paid.”

It underpins that emerging markets are eyeing flexible measures in the way that they gain the maximum economic uplift from the gambling sector.

Whilst the two African markets are taking alternative strategies to the implementation of excise duty, both clearly view it as a strong avenue to elevating tax intake from the gambling industry.

If market forecasts are to be believed, the decision of Kenya to decrease its excise duty tax could be set to pay off as they are predicted to see an uplift in gaming tax intake. Zambia will provide an interesting comparison as time tests whether the implementation of excise duty has an overall benefit to the economy and the gambling sector’s output.

Rates in Nigeria also frame Zambia as setting a relatively high bar for excise duty tax. In Nigeria, a withholding tax of 5% on winnings for residents and 15% for non-residents has been introduced.

The need to ensure market nuances are met while at the same time retaining simplicity can’t be understated when it comes to a complex tax structure. However, critics right now argue that Zambia is lacking this as it heads towards a straight 10% rate.

In a recent interview with iGaming Expert, Christopher Coyne, Co-Founder and CEO of 888 Africa shared his trepidation that Zambia would take a lead from Kenya in terms of taxation rates, subsequently making it less appealing for operator expansion.

In terms of markets that present an opportunity, Coyne predicted that in five years, Nigeria will grow to become a giant, adding that Egypt has huge potential should it regulate in the coming years.

For many, Malawi remains one of the most alluring markets, following its drastic shift in gaming tax from 20% to 5%, in 2023.

Read more

Curacao shifts gambling responsibility from PM following board departures 

The implementation of the LOK (the country’s new regulatory framework) remains on track even amidst the mass departures of the Curacao Gaming Authority’s Supervisory Board, according to a defiant message from the regulator.

Following the board’s resignation in mid-September, Prime Minister Gilmar Pisas had reportedly taken direct oversight of the board to fulfill plans for Curacao gambling licences to enter a new era of higher compliance standards and regulatory governance.

However, the government has since denied Pisas’ intervention, stating that management of the CGA must fall under the oversight of the Ministry of Justice. According to the determination, the board’s ‘reshaping’ is fairly standard, given it was shifted from the Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Justice, a move that took place in August’.

The CGA’s Aideen Shortt told iGaming Expert: “The transfer of ministerial responsibility from Finance to Justice is a natural progression as Curaçao’s regulatory framework matures. Having built the legal and operational foundations for the new regime, the CGA is now focused on supervision and monitoring – areas that naturally fall within the Justice portfolio.”

The shifting of the CGA’s supervision from the Finance to the Justice department will be welcomed by many, given the challenges that Curacao’s Finance Minister, Javier Silvania, has faced.

At the end of the last year, forensic investigator Luigi Faneyte filed a report that laid out allegations against Silvania of misconduct, corruption, fraud, embezzlement and money laundering related to the issuance of online gambling licenses.

One of the key allegations levelled against Silvania related to the process of the issuing of “provisional” online gambling licences, with allegations that several had been granted prior to the Lok being enacted, which led to criticism around their legitimacy.

Just last week, Quincy Girigorie, leader of the opposition party PAR, lambasted Silvania, claiming that his dispute with the head of the Tax Receiver’s Office, Alfonso de Jesús Trona, “strikes at the heart of Curaçao’s democratic integrity”.

This dispute escalated at the end of last month when an audio clip was leaked, which captured a spat between the two.

The clip, which has gone viral across Curacao, features the two power figures firing allegations of corruption against each other.

Following the leak, PAR leader Quincy Girigorie took to a press conference to express the seriousness of the situation as he emphasised that “for the first time in our history, a senior official has publicly stated that a Minister of Finance has committed criminal offences.”

Despite the political tensions, the CGA issued assurances that the process to appoint new members of the board is underway, and the implementation of the Lok remains on course and uninterrupted.

Shortt stated: “Supervision and governance within the CGA continue uninterrupted. The Authority remains fully functional and independent, continuing to implement and enforce Curaçao’s new regulatory framework under the LOK.

“Despite sensationalist headlines and fake-news articles, there is no delay or deviation in the rollout of the LOK, and no disruption to the CGA’s licensing or compliance programmes.”

The Ministry of Finance is headed up by Shalten Hato, who has sought to take a tougher approach to money laundering in the country, publicly emphasising that there has been an increase in prosecutions for the crime.

During a recent Parliamentary meeting, he outlined statistics that revealed that 26 individuals had been prosecuted for money laundering. Furthermore, he also detailed that money laundering cases linked to drug trafficking had risen last year – as he sought to showcase a tougher stance against illicit money.

Read more

Urgent warning that Chile’s gambling vacuum is becoming unaffordable

Chile’s casino sector has escalated its call for urgent gambling reforms after the Supreme Court ruled that online betting operations are illegal.

Speaking to SBC Noticias, Cecilia Valdés, Executive President of the Asociación Chilena de Casinos de Juego (ACCJ), stated that the ruling must “serve as a catalyst for legislation, not as a temporary patch”, insisting that Chile needs a proper legal framework for its growing online gambling market.

“The Court did its job by upholding the law,” Valdés told SBC Noticias. “But now it’s Congress’s turn. The judiciary cannot continue to act as a substitute regulator for an industry that politicians have refused to legislate. Chile urgently needs a modern, clear and enforceable gambling law.”

Courts are not regulators

Valdés was clear that judicial interpretations cannot replace actual regulation. “The courts are not designed to regulate industries. They interpret the law but we still don’t have one,” she argued. “Every ruling offers short-term clarity but no long-term stability. Only Congress can provide that.”

Chile’s land-based casinos already operate under strict supervision from the Superintendence of Casinos, which enforces tax compliance and responsible gambling standards. Offshore online operators, however, operate without oversight or contribution to the economy.

“We need one system of rules for everyone,” Valdés said. “It’s unacceptable that regulated casinos are held to the highest standards while online platforms can operate freely from tax havens.”

Chile behind neighbours

The ACCJ has warned that political paralysis threatens to push Chile further behind regional peers such as Colombia, Peru and Brazil — all of which have already introduced online gambling frameworks.

“Every month without regulation means more capital leaving the country, more players exposed to unsafe environments, and more tax lost to the state,” Valdés said. “Not regulating is not neutral — it rewards those who break the law.”

The ACCJ believes that with the right framework, Chile could transform online gaming into a legitimate part of its emerging digital economy.

Matter rolls to a new election

The ACCJ expressed deep frustration that the government has failed to deliver a new Gambling Bill pledged by President Gabriel Boric at the last election. A lost opportunity to bring assurance to the market as Chile electorate heads to the polls in November

“We were told gaming regulation would be a priority,” Valdés said. “Instead, another election has come and gone without a law. Every delay creates more uncertainty and gives illegal operators more space to grow.”

“Chile’s gambling industry has been left in legal limbo for too long,” Valdés continued. “Each year without reform undermines legal operators, weakens tax revenues and damages public trust. We cannot keep relying on court rulings to patch a broken system.”

Clear Vision for 2030

Valdés outlined a vision for a hybrid gambling industry where physical casinos and regulated online platforms coexist under unified, transparent rules.

“Online gaming can help build Chile’s new economy,” she said. “It can create jobs, attract tech partnerships, and drive responsible entertainment — but only under proper regulation.”

She added that technologies such as artificial intelligence, gamification and virtual reality could enhance player protection and customer experience, provided they are implemented within an ethical and regulated structure.

“Our goal for 2030 is a stable, transparent and innovative industry — one that creates jobs, pays taxes and protects players,” Valdés concluded. “The time for political hesitation is over. Chile must legislate for the digital era — and stop asking the courts to fix what only the government can resolve.”

Read more

Illegal casino bust underpins need for modernisation in Bolivia 

A significant bust of an illegal casino operation in Bolivia has been confirmed by the Bolivia Gaming Control Authority (AJ).

The operation was disguised as a food venue, and players were recruited to play through WhatsApp engagement. In a market where inspections are frequent, the illicit actors also utilised an expansive camera network to avoid detection.

As a result of information provided to the authorities, two slot machine gaming devices were seized, and the operation was halted.

It continues action by Bolivian authorities to tackle the illicit market – so far this year, 61 illegal gambling sites have been raided, and 85 gambling facilities have been seized.

The Santa Cruz department currently holds the highest number of illegal gambling sites reported.

There is also a strengthened effort and strategy to ensure that none of the machines re-enter the illicit market, with 2024 seeing the destruction of 639 illegally confiscated gaming machines.

Whilst online gaming is prohibited in Bolivia, there are limited land-based gaming licenses, however, they operate under strict frameworks.

This has led to only one legal license being issued in Santa Cruz and has potentially enabled the grey and black market to thrive and tap into gaps in the market.

There is currently a proposal to evolve the framework for Bolivia’s gaming landscape, however, having first been put forward in 2020, it remains in prolonged deliberation.

At the heart of the potential change in legislation is the inclusion of online gambling within the country’s legal framework.

Central to this is the ability to attract new investors to the sector and boost jobs and wealth across the country.

Furthermore, the changes to the legislation have also been cited as potentially being significant when it comes to tackling the rise of illegal operations that are being engaged with across Bolivia.

An election looms in Bolivia, and the regulated industry will be hoping that whoever comes in will place something of a priority on ensuring gambling regulation is strengthened.

There is currently a two-horse race in the country between Rodrigo Paz Pereira of the Christian Democratic Party and former President Jorge “Tuto” Quiroga. Neither candidate has outlined a specific stance for the gambling industry.

iGaming Expert Analysis: The modernisation of the Bolivian gambling sector is desperately needed and that is underpinned by the latest significant haul of unlicensed operators across the country.

As of right now, the lack of a clear path to regulatory compliance and licensing presents a real challenge for operators that are looking to expand in the country.

Read more

Unibet faces €75m Dutch consumer claim on pre-licence activities 

Unibet Netherlands faces a collective compensation claim of €75m led by Dutch consumer-claims organisation Dynamiet.

A lawsuit has been filed representing 2,500 Dutch customers of Unibet NL who seek lost money from the operator,for facilitating illegal online gambling prior to the launch of the Remote Gambling Act (KOA) on 1 October 2021.

Dynamiet, which recently won a multi-million payout against the credit agency of Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR), has now turned its focus to the online gambling sector.

The organisation stated that it is pursuing a “first-of-its-kind legal challenge” against a gambling firm seeking a Dutch licence, arguing that operators who profited from illegal activity before regulation should face restitution claims.

At that time, Unibet and other offshore casinos were operating without a Dutch licence — a status that claimants argue rendered their gambling losses unlawful.

Leading the claim, Deepak Thakoerdien, Dynamiet’s cofounder, said the move reflects the organisation’s broader mission to secure justice for those who were financially and emotionally harmed by unregulated online gambling.

“For many of these people, it’s not just about money — it’s about recognition,” he explained. “They were ignored for years while being drained by an illegal casino. Waiting is for spectators; we are here to act.”

Dynamiet has confirmed that it will initially file claims for 1,000 players, with the remaining 1,500 to be added in stages, bringing the total claim value to approximately €75 million. The action targets Kindred Group, Unibet’s parent company, and its subsidiary Risepoint.

According to Dutch iGaming news outlet CasinoNieuws.nl, the summons has already been formally served by a court bailiff. -“The case is being heard by the District Court of The Hague and concerns two entities: Kindred Group Limited (formerly Kindred Group Plc) and Risepoint Limited (formerly Trannel International Limited). Risepoint is no longer part of the group following Kindred’s recent acquisition by FDJ (now FDJ United).”

CasinoNieuws.nl further reports that Dynamiet accuses Unibet of admitting Dutch players for years without holding a valid licence, while failing to meet mandatory player-safety checks such as Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures.

The legal services provider claims that Dutch consumers could deposit via iDEAL, use Dutch-language customer service, and play on a Dutch-language website, all of which suggest that the operator specifically targeted the Dutch market in violation of gambling law.

The combined losses of the players involved have amounted to approximately €75 million, money Dynamiet argues was “unlawfully obtained”, since agreements between Unibet and Dutch players should be considered as “null and void.”

The organisation also points to a 2019 fine imposed by Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Netherlands Gambling Authority against Unibet for operating illegally, arguing that the company “deliberately acted in violation of the Gambling Act.”

“You can’t avoid responsibility,” Dynamiet stated in its press release.

In 2019, during the final phase of the KOA’s passage, the Dutch House of Representatives (Kamer) chose not to impose retroactive tax liabilities on operators for their pre-market activities — a decision that drew criticism from several ministers.

However, the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA) implemented a cooling-off period for operators such as Unibet, which already held a significant Dutch customer database, a judgement the regulator deemed to be in the market’s interest.

As a result, Unibet’s market launch was delayed until 4 July 2022, one year after the KOA regime came into effect.

The claim against Unibet forms part of a wider campaign by Dynamiet, which in early 2025 announced its intention to take legal action against six other foreign gambling brands including PokerStars, Betsson, N1 Casino, Bwin, LeoVegas, and 888 Casino. Collectively, these cases represent around 5,000 players and €100 million in alleged losses.

Unlike typical litigation funds, Dynamiet operates independently and self-finances its actions on a no-cure-no-fee basis, charging a 33% commission only upon success.

Legal experts see the Unibet case as a potential landmark for retroactive liability in Dutch gambling law. If successful, it could open the door for further mass claims against operators that accepted Dutch players before the KOA regime, setting a precedent for historic accountability in Europe’s regulated gambling markets.

Read more

MA regulators consider rules around VIP sportsbook host compensation

Just days after tackling the subject of limiting bettors, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) held a discussion on another hot-button issue.

On Thursday the group of five commissioners listened to a presentation from MGC Chief of Sports Wagering Carrie Torrisi and MGC Director of Research and Responsible Gambling Mark Vander Linden.

The two offered an overview of how the VIP industry works in sports betting based on information they requested from operators and obtained via the commission’s own research and offered recommendations for potential regulatory changes as it pertains to them going forward.

Sportsbook VIPs are generally men age 35-45

The presentation offered some insights into a facet of the business that lacks a lot of open information and clarity.

Torrisi and Vander Linden confirmed that the most common demo for VIP customers is men in their late 30s to early 40s and, on average, participated as a VIP for 10 months. The data varied substantially by operators, but..

Read more

Newsletter: The goal is shared, the rulebook differs

Stop, collaborate and listen SBC Media has published the first part of its International Player Safety Index today with partner 1xBet making a call for communication, clarity and consistency. The report is the first part of a series, with this one interviewing operators and regulators in Western Europe. It found: Something’s gotta give: Perhaps the most…

Read more

Slovakia reshuffles Gambling Office leadership for second time in 2025

The Republic of Slovakia has reorganised the leadership ranks of the Office for the Regulation of Gambling (ÚRHH) for the second time this year.

The Ministry of Finance confirmed that Libuša Baranová has been appointed Director General of the gambling authority, following a decision by Finance Minister Ladislav Kamenický.

The change sees Jana Mravíková, who had led the ÚRHH since April, move to the position of Director of the Department of Economics and Operations, effective 1 October 2025.

Mravíková had assumed the top post earlier this year after the departure of Martin Bohoš, who had served as Director General since 2019.

Upon leaving office, Bohoš had called for a full review of Gambling Act of Slovakia, warning that the framework was failing to keep pace with rapid growth of online casino and insufficient consumer safeguards.

The latest leadership change arrives amid mounting political pressure to overhaul gambling governance in Slovakia. The Sports and Tourism Minister, Rudolf Huliak, has tabled a new set of amendments designed to deepen the social responsibility and duties of gambling operators towards Slovak consumers and sports funding.

Huliak has repeatedly argued that Slovakia must “regulate, not promote gambling“, emphasising greater protection for vulnerable players and stricter enforcement against illegal operators.

Elsewhere, opposition parties from the Christian Democratic Movement (KDH) have demanded that the Ministry of Finance conduct a tax audit into the gambling sector. The party questions why national wagers have increased sharply, yet tax receipts remain stagnant at €340m.

KDH leaders have accused the ministry of neglecting oversight duties while regulated operators continue to benefit from low transparency and inconsistent enforcement.

Of significance, a series of reports by the Supreme Audit Office and the Institute for the Regulation of Gambling (IPRHH) have highlighted that regulatory shortcomings must be addressed, with Slovakia’s current system described as fragmented, under-resourced, and outdated.

As Baranová takes charge, industry observers expect the new leadership to focus on restoring public confidence, strengthening consumer protections, and ensuring that gambling taxation and regulatory practices are aligned with Slovakia’s broader fiscal and social policy goals.

Read more

Interview: 1xBet calls for communication, clarity and consistency from regulators

As regulated markets become more ubiquitous across the globe, there has been an increased focus on player protection measures. Operators are under more and more pressure to put all guardrails in place to ensure players don’t fall into problematic patterns.

But that is a challenge becoming increasingly difficult without effective and constructive dialogue with regulators, according to 1xBet’s Strategic Advisor, Simon Westbury.

Westbury, speaking exclusively to SBC News at SBC Summit 2025, warned that without open dialogue operators cannot possibly have the clarity or consistency to properly protect players.

He spoke as 1xBet collaborated with SBC Media on a research report on player protection in Western European markets.

“I think what we saw was regulators were viewed more like enforcement agents rather than people you could have a conversation with,” he said. “I’m talking about the three Cs. It was clear that we needed more communication between regulators and operators. Operators are asking for more clarity and also consistency.”

Confusion and uncertainty in western Europe
Some of the findings in the report include that 60% of operators marked the regulation in their primary jurisdiction as seven out of 10, with 43% saying they were unsatisfied, and 26% adding they were worried about the clarity of the information they had.

Some anecdotal data included that some UK operators are nervous to engage with the UKGC, because they didn’t want to look stupid, and Swedish operators looking at how enforcement was done in court cases to understand how the regulations should be applied.

Image: Simon Westbury/1xBet
“I think it’s slightly concerning,” Westbury added. “If we’re the standard bearer in Western Europe for player protection, then we’ve got a lot of work to do.”

Further stats within the body of research included that 30% of respondents said they apply the most stringent regulation if they’re multi-jurisdictional.

Westbury said that this simply isn’t conducive to being a global gambling operator.

“Now that’s mental,” he exclaimed. “In terms of personalisation and localisation for players, you have to suit people individually. Someone in Spain is different from someone in France.”

One consistent theme that Westbury identified was that there are clearly improvements required in operators’ dealings with regulators in most western European markets.

He explained: “I think it’s clear that everyone’s working towards the same goal on player protection, but there’s different rulebooks and different standards.

“Operators are confused and I don’t want to be too critical of regulators, but you can’t have an operator in a highly regulated market scared to engage with the regulator. That doesn’t make any sense to me.”

Who takes responsibility for responsible gambling?
In some quarters, particularly throughout media reports and political lobbies, there are accusations that the gambling industry doesn’t do enough on player protection leaving certain segments of consumers vulnerable to the risks of problem gambling.

When SBC News put the question to Westbury, he didn’t outright refute the claims, but noted that operators cannot be solely responsible for any harm.

“I think sometimes there’s a facade that we’re trying to do enough, but this report actually shows quite clearly there’s some challenges,” he said. “Maybe that isn’t a facade. Maybe we are trying to do everything we can.

“But when you read a regulation that’s written in beautiful legal language and you engage with a regulatory body and they just send you back the guidance, it’s not really helpful. You have to understand these guys are civil servants; they are enacting the regulation, but if it’s not clear, how can you enact it?

“That’s the challenge. It’s not that we’re not doing enough. I think at times we’re trying and failing, but I’m not going to put that on anyone’s responsibility.”

So if there is no responsibility for some of the failings, who should take responsibility for player protection. While a nuanced discussion, Westbury did outline that players cannot be held responsible for addictive personality, whether that is for gambling or alcohol or any other addictive behaviour.

He added that certain regulator actions mean that in certain circumstances they must bear the brunt.

For example, in Spain – one jurisdiction in which 1xBet is licensed – the DGOJ regulator is introducing an algorithm to act as a standardised form of risk detection for problem gambling.

He said: “I think this is why this algorithm that they’ve developed in Spain is going to be very interesting, because the onus really isn’t on the operator, it’s on the regulatory body to develop that algorithm and make that algorithm effective. If the operator has that algorithm and the algorithm doesn’t work, it’s not on the operator. It’s not our algorithm.”

Ultimately, though, Westbury did note that operators must take the majority of the responsibility, adding: “The onus has to be on the operator but the problem is when you put the onus on the operator and the regulations aren’t clear, there becomes a grey area which can be exploited, positively or negatively.”

Measuring responsible gambling efficacy
The conversation turned towards best practices for responsible gambling and while tools like deposit limits and interventions are commonplace, 1xBet’s advisor noted that dialogue between all stakeholders can help improve things even more.

That is why 1xBet decided to publish research – to begin a wider conversation around player protection in western European jurisdictions, often touted as some of the leading lights for responsible gambling measures.

Westbury noted: “We are a global company, but we have to have local specificity and that varies from market to market, because our edges are different, and also the regulations are different. We’re not asking for uniform regulations, but we just need more dialogue.

“I don’t think there is a best standard at the moment. I think this report shows that, and I think that this isn’t a one off that we’re doing.”

Finding best practices also include identifying the measures that are most effective in the player protection sector. But how can the industry actually measure this?

Westbury acknowledged that this can be a difficult task, but he pointed out that ensuring that keeping players in regulated markets can be a good barometer and this is driving 1xBet’s interest in acquiring licences around the world.

“The effectiveness is in identifying problem gamblers at the earliest stage so that nothing gets out of control,” he said. “How successful we are is pretty indeterminable to understand, because if you stop one and you find one problem gambler, that’s a result.

“It’s like everything, you can’t stop everyone and people in this day and age always find a way. That’s where we really need to work as an industry, because the black markets are growing in all countries and when the player goes there, they lose all aspects of protection.”

1xBet’s report into player protection in Western European markets is the first of a series of reports that the operator is producing on player protection in different regions. The company is looking to further its commitment to player protection and hopes that by producing research, it can provide valuable input into the conversation.

“You’re never going to make regulation and player protection sexy, but I think this report is interesting,” he said. “I’m looking forward to our other regional reports because the findings are going to guide where we go as an industry, and actually they give us a platform to elevate our performance as operators and regulators.”

You can download the International Player Safety Index by heading here.

Read more

MA regulator fines PENN $15K for Rece Davis ‘risk-free’ comment

An ESPN College GameDay segment that aired in 2024 led to a $15,000 fine levied against PENN Sports Interactive by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC).

ESPN host Rece Davis made on-air comments in March 2024 during an ESPN Bet segment on College GameDay. Davis and another ESPN analyst, Erin Dolan, discussed NCAA men’s basketball betting picks with Davis describing a wager as a “risk-free investment.”

“You know what? Some would call this wagering, gambling, I think the way you sold this, I think what it is, is a risk-free investment. That’s the way to look at it,” said Davis when discussing a second-round March Madness matchup between UConn and Northwestern.

MGC holds an adjudicatory proceeding on the incident

An adjudicatory hearing conducted by the MGC in April determined that PENN, which operates ESPN Bet, violated compliance standards required by Massachusetts gaming law.

The MGC’s authority under state gaming law requires it to ban “advertisements, marketing and branding..

Read more