SBC News

Battle lines drawn in Nigeria gambling dispute  

Backlash remains rife concerning the impact of Nigeria’s Central Gaming Bill and its touted regulatory impact on the country’s gambling sector.

According to reports, there is concern amongst stakeholders over the bill diluting the control of the lottery from the state, leading to a petition being put forward pursuing the rejection of the bill.

Pursuit of the rejection of the bill largely comes from the Federation of States Gaming Regulators of Nigeria (FSGRN), underpinning major concerns over the way the establishment of a Central Commission would have on fiscal federalism in Nigeria.

The petition is aiming to ensure that a central regulator can’t provide state licenses to operators, ensuring that this remains the responsibility of the state.

Nonetheless, the government has continually put forward the case that because iGaming crosses borders this should be the role of a universal operators.

The protection of state revenue is also integral to the bill, with fears it would be lost in the result of the formation of a nationwide commission.

The petition is calling for the nationwide governmental regulation to only oversee the FCT, which is where Abuja is located.

Rallying against the bill, the case has been put forward that it is unconstitutional and simply doesn’t align with the country’s federal system.

However, no matter how fervent and vocal opposition to the bill is, it may well be futile as the Bill has already progressed beyond its third reading in the National Assembly.

There is still a level convolution to its progress though, which will provide state regulators with optimism that it can be halted with enough friction.

In likely next steps for it to be formalised, the Senate must review and vote on the Bill, where they will have the option to make adjustments.

Proponents of the bill have argued that it can eradicate growth of illicit operations and boost efficiency within the licensing process.

The dispute lands at a time when the Nigerian gambling industry rides a wave of momentum in terms of engagement and traffic.

Driven by youth and fintech tapping into the gambling industry, it was recently predicted that Nigeria’s iGaming sector is set to grow by 16% and hit NGN $500m in revenue by the end of the year.

The Lagos State Lotteries and Gaming Authority emphasised that this has been significantly accelerated by the growth of mobile tech in the country.

Major operators in the country, such as Betway, NairaBET, Bet9ja, 22Bet, and 1xBet, have all seen positive growth through fintech collaborations, utilising mobile wallets to elevate the user experience for gambling.

Read more

New Zealand takes ring fencing approach to gambling taxation 

New Zealand is taking a ring fenced approach to its gambling framework as it looks to level the playing field between offshore and domestic operators.

Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden laid out that offshore gambling duty is set to rise from 12% to 16%, with that extra 4% ring fenced to fund community and grassroots sports funding.

Announcing the decision, van Velden emphasised: “While I am confident the regulated online casino market will provide new community funding opportunities for New Zealand sports clubs and community organisations, I do acknowledge that predicting the exact impact on existing Class 4 [pokies] returns creates some uncertainty.

“Cabinet has agreed on a two-year review after implementation of the community returns policy to assess the impact of online casino gambling on other forms of gambling and community returns.”

She added: “The message from communities was loud and clear – if we’re regulating online gambling, they want to see benefits flow back to local sports clubs, community groups and grassroots organisations.

“I have listened, and now as a government, we are delivering on what matters most to communities across the country.”

“Problem gambling prevention and harm minimisation standards are non-negotiable and unchanged. Protecting Kiwis from gambling harm is still my number one objective.

“Community funding will not compromise this government’s commitment to reducing gambling harm.”

Rallying against proliferation

Van Velden has long spearheaded the campaign to safeguard against the proliferation of gambling operators in New Zealand, implementing regulation to ensure that a maximum of 15 licences can be issued in the country.

The increase comes at a vital time for the industry as it approaches the two year mark of regulation, which means an examination of the sector’s performance and structure will take place.

There has also been pressure around the impact of gambling within local communities and the economy as questions are raised over the prevalence of offshore gambling operators in the country.

Commenting on the upcoming review, van Velden said: “This evidence-based review will inform necessary adjustments allowing us to make informed policy decisions based on real-world data in future.

The Minister added: “This is new money on top of existing funding from pokies, Lotto, and TAB. We’re not taking anything away – we’re adding to what’s already there.

The Bill addresses a critical gap in New Zealand’s regulatory framework.

“Right now, Kiwis are gambling on thousands of overseas websites with no safety nets, no spending limits, and no recourse when things go wrong. That’s unacceptable.

“This Bill brings those operators under New Zealand law, with proper consumer protections, harm minimisation measures, and now – community benefits.”

The ring fencing approach to gambling taxation has been taken up in other markets, with government’s aiming to ensure that state revenue from the gambling industry goes to the right places.

It’s a particularly common theme in Australia. However, the New Zealand model appears more defined and purposeful than the model adopted in Australian states.

This may indicate that the New Zealand government is looking to alter the framework for offshore gambling operators, and enable the domestic TAB betting operator, managed by Entain under a 25 year contract, to thrive.

Closing off the market to offshore firms would also enable New Zealand’s domestic casino space, both incumbents like Sky City and potential new market entrants under the planned 15 licence framework, to better compete.

A different ring fencing strategy proposed in the UK

The idea of ring fencing was also touted as a potential solution tackling high risk gaming engagement in the UK during a Select Committee hearing this week.

This idea was met with disdain, understandably, from the UK trade body, the Betting and Gaming Council. MPs seem in favour, however, with Treasury Select Committee member Dame Meg Hillier the MP stating: “In other industries you can have ring fencing of different types of activity.

“Is that something you have considered at the Betting and Gaming Council, so that you can have online treatment in one way, even though the businesses operate as one? Would you consider ring fencing so that you are taxing things on different bases?”

The BGC’s CEO, Grainne Hurst, fired back with: “I think that would be difficult for operators to do. Obviously, they will be reinvesting some of their profits back into particular areas of the business where they think it is needed. If they were to ring fence particular elements of their offering, that would be quite difficult and would probably lead to a reduction.”

Read more

Spribe suspension shows Commission is turning attention to B2B firms

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has suspended the licence of Aviator-developer Spribe OÜ. The Poland-based company held a software licence with the Commission, but the regulator states it has come across cases of ‘serious non-compliance’ with its hosting requirements. In short, it appears that Spribe has been carrying out casino game hosting without holding the appropriate licence from the UKGC. The company…

Read more

Great Canadian casino rated second-best in world by RGC

Great Canadian Entertainment’s Elements Casino Surrey has been ranked No. 1 in Canada and second internationally by the Responsible Gambling Council’s RG Check accreditation program for its approach to responsible gambling.

The RGC describes RG Check as the most comprehensive responsible gambling accreditation program in the world. Developed by the council in consultation with policymakers, gambling providers, players and people who have experienced gambling harm, the certification evaluates land-based gambling venues and iGaming operators on their responsible gambling practices.

RG Check assesses gaming facilities on a set of best-practice criteria, including player safeguards, staff training, self-exclusion options, advertising standards and continuous improvement practices. Operators must achieve 50% in each standard area and 70% overall to be accredited. The RGC says it aims not only to attest to gambling operators’ existing efforts but also to help them determine the actions they need to take to improve.

In all, 10 Great Canadian casinos achieved reaccreditation in October, the coast-to-coast land-based operator announced:

Great Canadian Casino Vancouver, Chances Maple Ridge, Elements Casino Surrey and River Rock Casino Resort in B.C.
Elements Casino Brantford, Casino Ajax, Elements Casino Mohawk and Great Blue Heron Casino & Hotel in Ontario
Casino Nova Scotia Halifax and Casino Nova Scotia Sydney in Nova Scotia

“Receiving RG Check reaccreditation at 10 of our properties in October is a tremendous milestone,” said Great Canadian Entertainment Social Responsibility and Sustainability Manager Keno Maseli. “Responsible gambling is at the heart of our operations, and this recognition reaffirms our unwavering commitment to ensuring our guests can enjoy safe, fun and sustainable experiences.

“This achievement is also a testament to the work of our team members, the Responsible Gambling Council and our Crown partners in setting the high standards of excellence in player protection across our entire portfolio.”

The RGC did not confirm to Canadian Gaming Business which casino took the top spot globally, as sharing scores is at the discretion of operators.

RG Check baked into Ontario iGaming requirements
RG Check accreditation lasts for three years before the recipients must go through the process again to re-earn the certification. Several of the Great Canadian’s other casinos currently enrolled in the RG Check program will undergo the reaccreditation process later this year and in 2026 as part of their annual assessment cycle.

The RGC first introduced RG Check in the 2010s and expanded it from land-based casinos to iGaming platforms when Ontario opened Canada’s first regulated iGaming market in 2022.

In March 2022, before Ontario opened its doors, a commitment to achieve RG Check accreditation was embedded into iGaming Ontario’s requirements for all operators seeking to enter the market. Some iGaming operators went through the process in advance of entering the market, while others such as Caesars earned it after starting to do online business in the province.

The RGC said last year that in 2024, it accredited more operators than ever before, handing out at least 44 new accreditations. The council’s Senior Vice President of Accreditation, Advisory and Insights Tracy Parker told Canadian Gaming Business earlier this year that the more it accredits operators, the more it learns.

“As we’ve been processing all of those operators, we’ve been learning a lot and doing some work on an update to the accreditation program to make sure it’s keeping up,” she said. “We’ve done stakeholder expert interviews, player surveys, public consultations, research and reviews, all with the aim of pulling together the evidence base that exists to make sure that the standards that we’re assessing operators against are meaningful and relevant and robust.”

Read more

NCAA delays pro sports betting to allow schools to vote on rule change

The NCAA is postponing a rule change to allow gambling on professional sports as the matter receives pushback from key stakeholders across college sports.

The national governing body of college sports is delaying a rule change to allow pro sports gambling from Nov. 1 to Nov. 22, allowing DI membership institutions to vote on the issue.

NCAA recession period kicks in

The NCAA allows Division I institutions to vote whether to rescind an approved rule change within 30 days if a rule proposal doesn’t receive at least 75% of votes from the DI Board. The board voted to adopt the proposal, but with less than 75% of the votes.

Nov. 22 is one day after the NCAA closes a membership rescission period. At least two-thirds or more of the institutions need to vote against the rule change for it to be rescinded. In order for a rule change to be implemented, councils from DII and DIII must also approve a rule proposal. The proposal was initially approved by DII and DIII councils.

Potential rule c..

Read more

Betway Premier League withdrawal highlights consequences of Zambia tax hike

Tax hikes in Zambia have caused Betway to withdraw its principal partnership of the Zambian Premier League, in a major blow to the country’s sports scene..

The operator underpinned that the investment in the market had become unsustainable amidst the rise in excise duty in the country.

News that the government in Zambia would introduce a 10% excise betting duty tax has been met with backlash from many stakeholders. However, Betway’s significant moves will only serve to intensify this pressure.

Previously, there was an appeal from BetPawa and Betway to halt the tax, but this was dismissed by the country’s Constitutional Court.

At the heart of the appeal against the introduction of the tax were claims that it breached section 7 of the customs Excise (Amendment) Act No. 11 of 2025. Objections included an alleged lack of transparency, inadequate public consultation, and severe economic impact.

Furthermore, they also claimed that it was excessive, ambiguous, unimplementable and financially unsustainable, warning that it could impact their future ability to operate in the country.

Nonetheless, the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA) continued in its pursuit of the excise duty. The ZRA stated that it had engaged with stakeholders in the decision and emphasised that the duty is paid by bettors, not operators.

Following this, the operators looked to secure an interim injunction to stop enforcement of the excise duty pending the full hearing of their constitutional petition.

ZRA countered that the tax was lawful and implementable in its current form. The organisation emphasised that any interference at this stage would be an encroachment on its statutory duty.

Seemingly cementing a future for excise duty in Zambia, the Court decided that the petitioners failed to demonstrate a sufficiently serious constitutional issue to justify suspending the law at this stage.

Read more

Romania child gambling rates put strain on national support network

Romania is lacking experts to deal with higher-than-EU average rates of gambling among minors, politicians have cautioned.

Comments were made by Daniel David, Minister of Education and Research, who based his concerns on the European ESPAD 2024 report, which showed that Romanian youth were among the most prolific users of tobacco, alcohol and gambling in Europe.

David highlighted that the country is not equipped with enough mental health experts to effectively deal with the nationwide compulsive behaviours among children.

“We are above the average in terms of alcohol consumption, smoking, gambling and online addiction,” he said, cited by Romania’s national news agency Agerpres.

“We do not have enough specialists or enough centers. When I say that we do not have specialists, I mean those specifically trained in this field, based on scientifically validated protocols. These are the levels that we need to develop.”

Despite a plethora of awareness campaigns conducted in schools over the last few years, David stressed that compulsive behaviours are most effectively tackled within the family environment, with parents having to take on a proactive role in the prevention and support process.

The Minister raised the topic during a roundtable discussion in the city of Sibiu, where he was joined by a number of healthcare professionals and representatives of child care bodies.

In attendance was also Gabriela Alexandrescu, Executive President of the Romanian branch of international NGO Save the Children, who provided an in-depth look at the exact rate of gambling among under-18s.

She claimed that 14% of children have participated in gambling for money at least once in their lifetime, while 40% know of a peer who gambles.

The numbers are based on the organisation’s recent study on gambling behaviours among minors, which Save the Children has used as a base to call for a blanket ban on all advertisements in the country.

Furthermore, Alexandrescu added that one in 10 children have a family member who is addicted to gambling, which circles back to David’s comment on family support – showing that the adult is often the one who needs help and the impact of their gambling can be felt by other family members.

On that note, the local gambling sector has been continuously advocating for better problem gambling education and stronger self-exclusion policies to better protect the local population.

With a newly-restructured gambling regulator in the face of the ONJN, it remains to be seen whether policymakers will answer these calls.

Read more

Opposition calls for clarity in Curacao’s LoK implementation

Questions have been raised in Curacao over the oversight transfer of the market’s significant regulatory shift from the Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Justice.

The implementation of the National Ordinance on Games of Chance (LoK) continues to progress following its passing in December 2024, as the country takes on major regulatory efforts to modernise its gambling industry.

Opposition Member of Parliament Suzy Camelia-Römer, who represents the centre-left Movementu di Pueblo, Movement for the People Party, raised the question in Parliament over LoK’s transfer of oversight and when the house could expect legislative amendments to facilitate this move.

She also emphasised her concerns around the mass resignations that impacted the board last month and urged the government to clarify whether these were part of a succession plan.

Camelia-Römer highlighted previous warnings over the impact of the Finance Ministry being solely responsible for appointments to the Supervisory Board and Board of Directors of the CGA. However, she emphasised that these warnings fell on deaf ears and impacted the stability of the bill’s progress.

As such, she called for increased transparency around the reasons and the process behind the resignations. Off the back of the departures, there were widespread rumours that Prime Minister Gilmar Pisas had reportedly taken direct oversight of the board to fulfil plans for Curacao gambling licences.

However, the government has since denied Pisas’ intervention, stating that management of the CGA must fall under the oversight of the Ministry of Justice. According to the determination, the board’s ‘reshaping’ is fairly standard, given it was shifted from the Ministry of Finance to the Ministry of Justice, a move that took place in August.

Even amidst the governance shift, the CGA has underpinned that the implementation of the LoK is continuing as planned.

The CGA’s Aideen Shortt previously told iGaming Expert: “The transfer of ministerial responsibility from Finance to Justice is a natural progression as Curaçao’s regulatory framework matures. Having built the legal and operational foundations for the new regime, the CGA is now focused on supervision and monitoring – areas that naturally fall within the Justice portfolio.”

The CGA’s supervision shift from the Finance to the Justice department will be welcomed by many, given the challenges that Curacao’s Finance Minister, Javier Silvania, has faced.

Silvania resigned earlier in the month, taking a backseat in Parliament and moving away from Finance Ministry responsibilities.

Read more

ASA: William Hill FOBT voucher could incentivise irresponsible play

William Hill has been reprimanded by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) over a promotional voucher that was deemed to possibly encourage irresponsible play.

The ASA’s report stated that a customer received a voucher from a slot machine in a William Hill betting shop on 3 April 2025 at 11:51am. The voucher had the following text:

“You’ve won a £5 cash match on any game!”

“Redeemable between 03/04/2025 – 03/04/2025 from 05:20 PM – 11:59 PM in any venue”.

Within a complaint to the ASA, it was challenged whether the timeframe between the voucher being received and when it could be redeemed was a breach of the CAP code since it was “socially undesirable by encouraging irresponsible use”.

Despite William Hill arguing that the voucher didn’t breach the code or encourage socially undesirable or irresponsible behaviour, the ASA upheld the complaint and told the operator that the ad must not appear again in its current form and that future promotions must not encourage irresponsible behaviour.

William Hill: voucher not ‘designed to drive repeated play’

The voucher was issued to customers who deposit £50 or more on an eligible gaming machine before 5:20pm on the day that the promotion is issued and valid. This figure is the total value placed in-store, including a customer’s original cash-in and subsequent winnings played again.

Evidence was provided by William Hill to the ASA that the average cash-in in relation to the three-day promotion was “below the average spend for April and May 2025”. Therefore, the operator felt the amount that must be spent “to qualify for the promotion was substantial, nor that the promotion encouraged excessive staking”.

As it was a £5 voucher and could be spent on any game, the operator believed the promotion was “a low-value, one-off reward” and didn’t “involve any progressive elements, wagering multipliers, or additional conditions beyond what was initially displayed”.

William Hill noted it was “not part of a broader incentive structure nor designed to drive repeated play”, adding that the promotion’s terms, including the staking threshold and the redemption timeframe, were “clearly and fully” communicated to customers, and they were “given sufficient information to make an informed decision before participating”.

In addition, key qualifying conditions were “displayed on digital promotional screens in the shop and the voucher reiterated those eligibility conditions”, with the voucher serving as a “confirmation of eligibility which reminded consumers of the pre-disclosed redemption timeframe”.

William Hill also argued that the voucher’s redemption was entirely optional and that customers were free to not redeem the voucher or return later the same day. The operator supplied data too, showing that most customers who qualified for the voucher didn’t redeem it, which they believed demonstrated that customers knew redemption was optional.

The operator described the £5 voucher as ‘modest’ value and “did not believe that at any stage the promotion encouraged a customer to remain on the premises to engage in excessive consumption, nor encouraged irresponsible use”.

Although the promotion began at a later time than when the voucher was awarded, William Hill stated that it “did not encourage participants to remain on the premises and therefore it did not create any time-sensitive pressure to continue playing”, adding that very few customers redeemed the voucher within two hours, with most waiting three hours.

The operator said that the extended time between the voucher being issued and redeemed “strongly indicated” that most customers left and returned later to redeem the voucher, undermining the suggestion that the redemption window “pressured customers to remain in-shop or extend their play”.

William Hill added that any concerns regarding customer behaviour would have been met with a response in line with their polices, as all staff in their shops have received training to identify signs of gambling-related harm, and gaming machines provide prompts to remind customers of their time and money spent and allow customers to set limits.

ASA calls voucher ‘irresponsible’

Acknowledging the operator’s point of view, the ASA has upheld the complaint against William Hill since the timeframe of when the voucher is issued and redeemable “created an incentive for repeated play within a short period, including visiting the betting shop twice in a single day, increasing the risk of consumers gambling more than they otherwise would”.

Since the redemption period was at a later point in the day, the authority noted that participants could only benefit if they returned to the premises or stayed until the start time of the promotion, and that those eligible for the voucher may have already placed several bets earlier the same day.

“We thus considered that linking the reward to a same-day timeframe, particularly at a limited period later on the day, incentivised behaviours that could encourage irresponsible use,” the ASA stated.

“For those reasons, we concluded that the promotion encouraged irresponsible use and breached the Code”, particularly CAP Code (Edition 12) rule 8.5 (Protection of consumers, safety and suitability).

William Hill was told by the ASA that the advert must not appear again in the form complained of and that future promotions must not encourage irresponsible behaviour.

Read more

KSA Chairman: Gambling needs collective accountability to kill black market hydra

Michel Groothuizen, Chairman of the Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Gambling Authority of the Netherlands has declared that illegal gambling is now the principal threat to every regulated jurisdiction.

Speaking at the IAGR 2025 Conference in Toronto, Groothuizen urged regulators to “take ownership” of illegal gambling threats and called for the creation of an Interpol-style international network to coordinate global enforcement and information sharing.
“Illegal gambling is no longer a peripheral problem — it is the principal threat to every regulated market in the world,” he said. “We must act together as if we are the issue owner here.”

A 21st-century battle
Groothuizen described the challenge facing regulators as a technological mismatch between agile criminal networks and slow-moving authorities.

“It feels like we’re fighting a 21st-century war with medieval tech,” IAGR delegates were told. “Bigger and bolder ideas are needed to fight the black market, and that requires a deeper pool of stakeholders with technical expertise.”

He explained that current enforcement tools were designed in an earlier era of gambling regulation, long before the rise of smartphones, crypto transactions and AI-driven marketing — innovations that have transformed how unlicensed operators reach consumers.

“The incredible worldwide rise of smartphones and the incredibly fast growth of technology have made it harder to reach our goals, instead of easier,” he added.

Black Market is never stationary
The KSA Chair said the illegal sector has evolved into a fast-moving global ecosystem that consistently outpaces national law enforcement while threatening consumer safety.

“Illegal operators are innovative and agile. They are our most difficult opponent,” he warned. “We are battling a 21st-century opponent with outdated technology, and that puts us at a natural disadvantage.”

In the Netherlands, the issue has reached critical levels. While over 90% of players still use legal sites, the GGR-based channelisation rate has dropped below 50%, meaning half of all gambling spend now flows to unlicensed operators.

“We warned the government for a tsunami of advertising—and were proved right,” he said. “But if the market gives way to illegal actors, the situation will only worsen.”

He explained that advertising restrictions, while politically popular, have inadvertently pushed consumers towards the very black market the Dutch regime was designed to contain.

Thinking beyond political sensitivities

Groothuizen acknowledged that Dutch policymakers now view gambling as a “high-risk product”, shifting away from the liberalisation agenda that defined the 2021 market opening.

Since 2023, the government has banned celebrity endorsements, outlawed untargeted advertising, and imposed a €700 monthly deposit limit per operator.

“This change of direction is driven by the idea that existing policies do not protect people adequately,” he stated but warned of “ the risk is that overregulation pushes consumers towards unsafe, unaccountable environments—precisely the outcome our laws were designed to prevent.”

He cautioned that the growing compliance burden, combined with declining GGR, has made it harder for licensed firms to compete with unlicensed operators which face none of these constraints.

Though political sensitivities have changed towards gambling since regulation, a complete fallout could be witnessed to the black market.

Big Tech must be engaged
The KSA Chairman stressed that defeating the black market will be impossible without confronting its digital and financial enablers.

“There’s no escaping Big Tech’s involvement,” Groothuizen said. “Social media platforms are the frontline where many consumers encounter illegal gambling for the first time.”

He described how rogue operators buy up expired Dutch web domains — from restaurants and schools to coaches and small businesses — to boost their SEO rankings and funnel users to illegal sites. Influencers, he warned, are being used to promote offshore casinos to young audiences through livestreams.

“Those who do not know that an illegal website exists are not likely to visit it. And those who cannot make a deposit will quickly leave,” he said. “The solution must therefore include the actors who make the market possible in the first place.”

He urged regulators to engage directly with technology platforms and payment providers, or, failing that, push for EU-mandated minimum standards modelled on anti-money-laundering rules.

“We must engage with these parties, but we must also not be afraid to stir things up and act against them ourselves,” he said. “If we do not encounter enough cooperation, then European institutions must step in.”

Towards a Gambling Interpol
Groothuizen’s most ambitious proposal is the formation of a “gambling Interpol” — an international framework through which regulators can share intelligence, coordinate enforcement and apply collective pressure on enablers of the illegal trade.
“Let us put our efforts mainly into a sort of gambling Interpol — first Europe-wide, then perhaps worldwide,” he proposed. “The illegal market knows no borders. Our cooperation should be no different.”

He explained that existing bilateral efforts have proved insufficient. Illegal operators reappear under new domains within hours, nullifying traditional enforcement tactics.

“It’s like battling a Hydra — cut off one head, and two more appear,” he warned.

Groothuizen closed his speech by reframing the fight against illegal gambling as a matter of shared global responsibility rather than national jurisdiction.

“One might wonder who ultimately bears responsibility: the regulators, the politicians, or the big companies in tech and finance that help keep the market running,” he said. “But the fact that there is no clear answer does not absolve us.”

He called on regulators, governments, and industry partners to treat the protection of consumers as a collective moral duty… “Let us all act as if we are the issue owner here,” he concluded.

“Only by taking ownership together can we create an ecosystem capable of protecting players and striking a real blow to the illegal market.”

Read more