Uruguay’s casino sector was given a boost at the start of the year after the culmination of strike action saw operations restart.
This was made possible after the General Directorate agreed to negotiate and sign a document that opens a new round of dialogue with the union.
The original action was undertaken in revolt against new frameworks and what was described as ‘a disguised salary cut’, implemented by the new administration, headed by Director General Fernández Estévez.
Such conflict caused venuesto be closed during what would have been one of the busiest times of the year for casino footfall – any further delay had the potential to be considerably detrimental to the wider economy.
Cecilia Alegre, General Secretary of ANFUCE, referred to the situation in an interview with Radio Cadena del Mar of Uruguay (FM 106.5), stating: “It all started when the General Director Estévez, introduced changes that directly affect our jobs, without having gone through collective bargaining, as required by law.
“Furthermore, he informed us that he will disregard a bill regulating online gambling that was approved by an absolute majority in the Senate during the previous legislature. That bill is still in effect, but the new casino management has decided not to pursue it. Our salaries are 80% variable. They always depend on customer traffic in the casinos. And with the rise of online gambling, this will be significantly reduced.”
According to media reports, the proposal was put forward and led to the adoption of a common position, which subsequently saw the reopening of casinos.
Negotiations will continue between the union and the General Directorate, even as casinos have reopened, with the vast majority of them being state-run operations.
There has been much speculation that Uruguay could see significant reform within its gaming framework as it looks to modernise the sector and gain a major economic uplift as a result.
Plans to establish a new National Online Gambling Regulation Agency will undoubtedly have been boosted by the quick resolution to the dispute between workers and the state-owned casinos, with the reform to the gambling sector reportedly set to create north of 20,000 jobs.
There has been a significant need for the overhaul of casino regulation and supervision in the country, with the growth of the illegal sector causing much trepidation.
It is anticipated that the bill will be progressed in the first half of 2026, with President Orsi having previously urged caution when it comes to gambling reform, underpinning that it will be focused on public health outcomes rather than political pressure.
During a recent press briefing, he said: “Regulation cannot be dictated by market pressure or political expediency. It must be guided by what protects our citizens and strengthens confidence in the institutions that govern gambling.”
The bill for modernisation was put forward by Senator Felipe Carballo, as he eyed a “mixed model” in which the state would operate its own gambling platform but also regulate private operators.
The National Directorate of Lotteries and Quinielas would administer the state-owned platform, as well as oversee the licensing of private operators, the regulation of advertising and marketing practices and hold the power to sanction stakeholders and revoke licences.
Carballo underpinned the vital nature of modernisation for Uruguay, as it adapts to the globalised nature of the iGaming market.
He stated: “This paradigm shift has placed the Uruguayan state at a disadvantage in a globalised market, hindering its capacity for supervision, taxation, and control.
“The expansion of transnational platforms, coupled with the use of cryptocurrencies and virtual private networks (VPNs), has reduced the possibility of exercising effective authority over a sector that, if left unregulated, could generate significant economic, health, and social damage.”
There have also been proposals for private operators to be granted the opportunity to apply for licenses, in a system that would be overseen and include a state-owned operator.
A monopoly model would potentially only go some of the way in terms of tackling the growth of the black market, with a monopolised system being limited without regulated competition.
In terms of comparisons, Uruguay may look to emulate the models of Chile and Argentina, which both take a hybrid online gambling framework approach.
Whilst both models have seen the dilution of state-owned operator dominance, providing players with a myriad of options has hindered the surge of the black market in both countries and boosted player protection – both of which are key prerogatives for Uruguay as it evolves its gambling ecosystem.
The timeline for the cementing of the online sector in Uruguay is unlikely to be confirmed until 2027, the upcoming year is a pivotal one for the country and its strategy in gambling evolution.
Debate and conjecture are set to be essential to the year ahead, as details around the next evolution of the market are examined and eventually uncovered – providing clarity on who will be able to enter the market and what their journey will entail.
Whilst there appears to be widespread commitment to the bill developing, there will still be caution given the faltering of a previous bill in 2021.
A key reason for the bill falling five years ago was fractions over the potential decision to enable operators to gain an online license without having a physical presence in the country.