UK

GambleAware goes for concrete but lands on glass in latest industry critique

A study by GambleAware has claimed that operator safer gambling ads have a reverse effect, but it’s not without speculation.

Commissioned by the safer gambling charity, consultancy group Thinks Insight & Strategy looked at problem gambling campaigns produced by five different entities – GambleAware itself, the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), Betfair, William Hill, and 888, the latter two owned by the evoke Group.

The research paper was conducted as a Randomised Controlled Trial with a total pool of 4,013 participants. The charity did note that this presents a risk of bias, as only 443 participants meaningfully engaged with the practical part of the exam.

Participants were presented with a random safer gambling video from the catalogue, after which a pop-up of a mockup betting app was shown on screen, prompting the viewer to claim a free bet.

According to the study, the ad by GambleAware had the lowest click-through rate (3%) towards the betting app. This was followed by Betfair’s ad (4%) and BGC’s (6%). William Hill (18%) and evoke (15%) ads had the highest rates.

Alexia Clifford, GambleAware Chief Communications Officer, said: “This new research shows that so-called ‘safer gambling’ videos produced by gambling operators could be doing more harm than good. It’s unacceptable that adverts claiming to help people reduce their risk of harm are encouraging people to gamble more instead.”

Clifford called for more monitoring of industry-led ad campaigns led by stronger legislation on gambling marketing and advertising.

Potential for biases
As noted above, the report highlights that there was room for biases, with the researchers pointing that there were a list of limitations as far as the methodology is concerned.

As mentioned previously, any concrete conclusions are impossible due to the small number of participants (443) that went through with the betting app.

Furthermore, the research measured click-through rates to the mock gambling app instead of actual wagers placed. The authors highlighted that it is difficult to get an accurate estimate of actual gambling harm risks without direct evidence of financial expenditure.

Finally, the survey acknowledged that questions were placed at the end of the experiment, which could’ve led to a “cognitive fatigue” that led respondents to answers which they would’ve otherwise answered differently – essentially inflating PGSI scores.

GambleAware will stop existing in March 2026 as a result of a new UK statutory framework which will see the NHS manage all research, education and treatment funding to combat gambling-related harms.

Read more

ProgressPlay handed £1m UKGC fine for ‘unacceptable’ AML failures

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has issued a £1m fine to ProgressPlay Limited for compliance failures related to anti-money laundering and social responsibility.

Following a UKGC compliance assessment, the operator has also been handed a warning and is expected to undergo a third-party audit within six months of a licence review being concluded to ensure AML and social responsibility policies, procedures, and controls are being effectively implemented.

The Commission noted that the breaches took place over various dates between August 2021 and August 2024.

ProgressPlay, which operates 134 websites, has now faced enforcement action from the UKGC for the second time in three years, as the operator paid a £175,718 fine for social responsibility and AML failures in 2022.

John Pierce, Director of Enforcement and Intelligence at the UKGC, commented: “Gambling businesses must have robust policies and procedures in place to protect consumers and ensure appropriate anti-money laundering controls are maintained. These measures must be actively implemented and regularly tested to confirm their effectiveness.

“This case marks the second time ProgressPlay Limited has been subject to enforcement action by the Gambling Commission. Its failure to meet AML obligations, along with the gaps identified in its social responsibility processes, are unacceptable.”

According to the UKGC, AML failures by ProgressPlay included:

An appropriate Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (MLTF) risk assessment was not conducted and appropriate controls to minimise MLTF risk were not implemented.

Not considering all business-associated risks, failing to take a sufficient risk-based AML approach.

Transactions carried out during customer relationships, such as verifying source of funds, were not sufficiently scrutinised to ensure transactions were consistent with the casino’s understanding of the customer, their business activities, and their risk profile.

The Commission also stated that the operator’s social responsibility failures included:

Not having adequate systems and processes in place to monitor customer activity at the point of account opening effectively, early identification of potential gambling-related harm or the implementation of appropriate interventions was at risk.

Employing a customer interactions policy which didn’t adequately address the elements of identify, act and evaluate set out in the Remote Customer Interaction section of the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice.

Not implementing adequate processes to understand the impact of individual interactions and actions on a customer’s behaviour, the continued risk of potential harm, and whether further action is needed.

The UKGC noted that ProgressPlay cooperated with the investigation and took corrective steps to address the failings identified.

“As part of the regulatory outcome, ProgressPlay is now required to undergo an independent third-party audit to assess the adequacy of its compliance arrangements across these areas,” Pierce added.

“Operators should be in no doubt: repeated regulatory breaches will result in increasingly severe enforcement action. We urge all operators to examine the failings identified in this case and take proactive steps to strengthen their own systems and controls.”

September 15 will see SBC organise a groundbreaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more

GambleAware calls for safer gambling video guidelines after industry advert study

GambleAware is calling on the UK Government to produce safer gambling video guidelines after new research brings into question the impact of operator’s safer gambling adverts.

In addition, the charity is also calling for more effective monitoring and accountability for industry-led campaigns, as well as a consistent framework to ensure adverts are protective.

Conducted by Thinks Insight & Strategy with academic expert Professor Elliot Ludvig, the research examined the effectiveness of safer gambling video campaigns currently being used by major operators.

Videos used include a control video, ‘Magnets’ stigma campaign by GambleAware, Play at your best by Betfair, Top tips for positive play by William Hill, Take time to think by the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC), as well as Made to play safely by 888.

Participants were randomly exposed to the different safer gambling video adverts, followed by a simulated online environment in which the video’s effect on their subsequent inclination to gamble was captured. This was done to see what safer gambling message types affect gambling behaviours and attitudes, as well as how effective operator methods were in reducing harmful gambling.

‘Backfire effects’

The study noted that Top tips for positive play by William Hill and Made to play safely by 888 adverts had “backfire effects” and led to a significant increase in click-through rates compared to the control.

According to the study, these videos “may encourage gambling engagement, potentially due to their framing or the promotional nature of their messaging. Attitudinal survey results suggest the videos may reinforce the idea that gambling is safe, create a false sense of security, increase gambling intent, and, despite being perceived as trustworthy, subtly downplay gambling risks”.

The study noted that 45% of participants that were shown the Made to play safely by 888 felt as though it suggested gambling was harmless fun, while this figure was 38% for the Top tips for positive play by William Hill.

Ludvig stated: “The study suggests that some safer gambling videos from gambling operators have a backfire effect, encouraging gambling and having the opposite effect to their intended purpose of helping people control how much they gamble.

“The findings from this experiment should be used to help to guide the design of effective safer gambling advertising videos and establish standards for measuring their impact.”

Other results

The ‘Magnets’ stigma campaign video was shown to have ‘protective effects’, resulting in a significant decrease in click-through rates, as their personal narrative and serious tone may have helped to foster “greater awareness of gambling harms”.

In addition, the attitudinal survey results suggest that the video “effectively normalises gambling problems as widespread, encourages self-reflection, counters the idea of gambling as harmless fun, and is perceived as trustworthy, potentially enhancing its protective impact on behaviour”.

Of the participants, 15% thought the advert suggested that gambling was harmless fun.

Play at your best by Betfair and Take Time To Think by the BGC were said to not produce significant behaviour changes, as the study stated that the Take Time To Think messaging “had no effect” while the Play at your best “had a straightforward, clear communication style and did not backfire”.

The videos were also said to be able to provide “useful strategies for managing gambling but do not strongly encourage self-regulation or behaviour change, slightly increase gambling intent, and foster a sense of control without clearly influencing gambling decisions”.

Of the participants, 39% thought Play at your best by Betfair suggested that gambling was harmless fun, while this figure was 32% for Take Time To Think by the BGC.

Industry can’t ‘mark its own homework’

GambleAware also noted that the study found that the industry-produced adverts increase gambling intentions among communities most at risk, including younger people and those experiencing gambling problems, as on average, 14% of those aged 18-34 clicked on the “pop up” advert to place a free bet, compared to vs 4% of those aged 55+.

In addition, the charity mentioned that gambling operators are supposed to allocate 20% of their digital and broadcast advertising budgets to safer gambling messaging on digital channels, but prior to this study, there was a lack of monitoring this and a lack of published evidence showing the potential impact.

Alexia Clifford, GambleAware Chief Communications Officer, said: “This new research shows that so-called ‘safer gambling’ videos produced by gambling operators could be doing more harm than good. It’s unacceptable that adverts claiming to help people reduce their risk of harm are encouraging people to gamble more instead.

“The gambling industry cannot be left to ‘mark its own homework’ on such an important issue. We need stronger legislation on gambling marketing and advertising, including more effective monitoring of gambling industry-led advertising campaigns, health warnings on all gambling advertising, and for all adverts to signpost to where people can get help for gambling harms.”

September 15 will see SBC organise a groundbreaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more

Survey design found to impact UK gambling participation estimates

Fresh experimental research led by Professor Patrick Sturgis has shed light on why gambling surveys see varying levels of participation and generate differing estimates of problem gambling.

The news arrives just weeks after the Gambling Commission (UKGC) pledged to strengthen confidence in the outputs of its new Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB) – a study that looks to determine the extent of gambling harm in the UK.

The study’s main output is determining how many Britons can be considered suffering from problem gambling, based on the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), which their responses to survey questions are assessed against.

The GSGB, launched this summer, has already drawn comparisons with the Health Survey for England (HSE) and Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey (APMS), which have both been used to inform policy decisions around gambling harm in the past.

The new research shows that design choices in surveys – from how invitations are worded to whether questions are asked by an interviewer – play a major role in shaping the results.

Why survey mode matters
The study found that explicitly mentioning gambling in an invitation did not affect how many people responded overall, but did attract more people with a personal interest in gambling, resulting in a four-point increase in reported participation.

Meanwhile, when it came to PGSI scores, this effect was smaller at 1.8 points and not statistically significant.

A bigger difference appeared when interview style was tested. Participants completing surveys online were almost 50% more likely to score one or above on the PGSI compared to those answering questions over the phone, underlining how people tend to under-report sensitive behaviour when speaking to an interviewer.

Updating the list of gambling products to reflect new market entries, however, had little to no impact on results.

Ben Haden, Director of Research and Policy at the UKGC, said: “The research builds our confidence in the outputs of GSGB, helps to understand the differences between surveys published on gambling and will improve our guidance for users.”

He stressed that no single study can ever definitively measure participation or harm, but that the regulator will continue to refine the GSGB, expand its use of datasets, and work with other survey providers to build a rounded evidence base.

Next steps for Commission guidance
Professor Sturgis emphasised the experimental design means “strong causal conclusions” can be drawn about the reasons for wide variability across gambling surveys, while noting that no single piece of research can provide the “true” value of participation or harm rates.

The Commission has been advised to update its guidance on interpreting GSGB results to better explain the differences with health surveys such as the HSE and APMS.

The regulator has confirmed that this update will be part of its ongoing improvement programme as it looks ahead to the second annual GSGB report, due for release on 2 October 2025.

With gambling harms still central to the White Paper reforms and under scrutiny in Westminster, the Commission has said it is keen to ensure the GSGB provides the most reliable picture yet of British gambling behaviours.

This data could prove critical as the debate around gambling regulation and the industry’s societal impact remains as heated as ever. Although the government seems committed to seeing out the recommendations of the Gambling Act review, it is facing calls for another regulatory overhaul from a large group of backbench MPs and local governments.

Read more

GamCare HQ relocation marks turning point for gambling harms charity

GamCare is preparing to leave its long-standing Holborn base for a new London headquarters later this month, signalling both a physical and strategic shift for the UK’s leading gambling harm support charity.

On 26 August, the charity will open at Salisbury House, Finsbury Circus. The current Saffron Hill site will operate until 22 August, with GamCare confirming no change to contact details and no disruption to services.

A spokesperson said that the relocation will provide “a vibrant, collaborative hub” to support its evolving way of working.

“We’re excited about this new chapter. The new office will give us the space and flexibility to continue innovating and supporting those who need us.”

Strategic shifts
The move coincides with a reconfiguration of GamCare’s programme portfolio.

For example, in July, the charity announced the wind-down of its Young People’s Programme by October 2025, an initiative that has delivered gambling harm education to under 18s.

GamCare did however confirm a new focus towards its Youth Advisory Board “to ensure young people’s voices continue to inform our work”.

Meanwhile, the charity has also launched an external review of its Women’s Pathway Programme, which began in 2024 to improve access to help for women going through negative effects of gambling.

“Fundamental to our approach is understanding the role that building women’s self-confidence/self-esteem, de-stigmatising gambling harm and improving health literacy plays in enabling women to access the services and support that they need,” the firm asserted.

Funding future
The relocation comes as GamCare awaits details on how the new statutory problem gambling levy will be distributed. Introduced on 6 April 2025, the levy replaces the voluntary funding system overseen by GambleAware, which will close by March 2026.

In response to GambleAware’s exit, GamCare stated: “GamCare thanks GambleAware for their leadership and contribution to the sector over many years.

“Under the voluntary funding system, their work has enabled the development and delivery of critical services – including GamCare’s National Gambling Helpline and the National Gambling Support Network.”

The charity said it will soon meet with NHS England, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) and regional governments to make sure funding changes happen smoothly and services keep running.

Read more

Labour lines drawn as UK politics’ betting shop debate heats up

Labour MP Dawn Butler has called on the government to push for councils to put a stop to the “rapid spread” of betting shops, but the governing party’s members’ views on gambling do not always line up.

Butler’s Brent East constituency, she noted, already has more than 100 gambling premises, which she said has pushed her to campaign to call for more preventative measures against companies targeting the high streets.

A familiar topic has arisen, the question of whether bookmakers target more vulnerable communities, as Butler notes: “Why are there barely any betting shops in Canary Wharf but rows of them in places like Bethnal Green?”

“It’s not by accident”
Butler argued that Aim to Permit makes it easy for betting companies to target less wealthy areas, stating that “It’s time to end it.”

The Aim to Permit clause currently limits the power of local councils to refuse applications for new gambling establishments. Some politicians, both at the local and national level, have been calling for local governments to gain greater powers to prevent betting businesses from setting up in their areas.

UK Parliament: Dawn Butler
An element to consider here is rent and expenses, with retail betting firms often setting up shop in areas with the lowest rental costs. This does mean, however, that more disadvantaged areas often see the most betting shops, something reform campaigners and other public figures believe is predatory.

In Butler’s case, the MP highlighted the widespread social harm caused by gambling, describing it as a public health crisis, and urged for changes to these planning laws that enable gambling operators to target ‘vulnerable’ and ‘disadvantaged communities’.

A clash of opinion
In contrast, fellow Labour MP Richard Baker has recently underlined the importance of the UK’s regulated betting industry, describing it as a key contributor to local economies, public services and grassroots sport.

Speaking about his constituency of Glenrothes and Mid Fife in an op-ed for Politics Home, Baker highlighted the role betting shops play in sustaining high street footfall and creating jobs.

He said that modern betting shops support towns that have seen years of economic pressure, asserting: “Every job matters.”

Baker also emphasised the sector’s broader economic impact, pointing to its £6.8bn annual contribution to the UK economy, £4bn in tax revenues, and 109,000 jobs across the country.

He noted the deep ties between betting and sport, with regulated operators investing at every level. Both of these arguments are long-running, having been made by the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) on countless occasions over recent years amid an extensive debate on UK betting regulation.

Meanwhile, whilst acknowledging the harm caused by unregulated gambling, Baker warned against over-regulation that could drive consumers toward the black market.

He also added: “As a Labour MP, I want a tax regime that is fair, progressive and economically sound – one that protects the public, supports jobs, and rewards responsibility. More than ever, we need businesses that are investing and contributing.”

Is it really a problem?
As Butler said, Brent East already has more than 100 gambling premises, but could this be an anomaly?

The UK’s retail betting sector has undergone significant changes over the past decade, driven by regulatory updates, shifting consumer habits, the growth of online gambling and COVID-19.

From a peak of around 9,100 shops in 2013, the number of UK betting shops had fallen to approximately 5,995 by March 2023 – a 34% decline.

Much of this downturn followed the government’s decision in 2019 to reduce maximum stakes on fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) from £100 to £2.

Major operators responded swiftly such as William Hill which closed around 700 shops, Ladbrokes/Coral planned up to 900 closures, and Betfred projected 500 shop closures – collectively threatening over 10,000 jobs across the industry.

In 2020, the pandemic meant the sector saw additional closures, with William Hill confirming a further 119 shops would not reopen due to permanent declines in footfall. That year also saw Betfred close approximately 59 shops.

Despite the contraction, the sector remains a key employer in many local areas. However, its share of total sports betting revenue continues to shrink, with the online channel now dominating the market.

Tax reform looms
As political debate around gambling intensifies, the industry now faces fresh uncertainty over potential tax changes.

The Labour Treasury’s consultation on betting taxation closed on 21 July, and while no official recommendations have been published, reports suggest that significant reforms are pending.

Among the proposals, figures like Labour MP Alex Ballinger are pushing for the introduction of a single unified gambling tax, combining Remote Gaming Duty, General Betting Duty and Pool Betting Duty into one rate.

Supporters argue this would simplify the system and provide clarity for operators, while critics warn it could increase costs, threaten jobs and impact vital funding for sport and safer gambling initiatives.

With Chancellor Rachel Reeves under pressure to boost public finances, the industry is bracing for a move that could shape the future of the betting sector for years to come.

Fresh inquiries
Meanwhile, last month the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Gambling Reform has launched a new inquiry, led by Conservative MP Sir Iain Duncan Smith, to examine the future of gambling regulation in the country.

The inquiry aims to address gaps in the Government’s Gambling Act White Paper, focusing on stronger online protections, stricter advertising rules, and increased local authority powers.

Smith, a critic of current betting enforcement and ads, has emphasised the need for a regulatory framework fit for the digital age – something the Gambling Act review White Paper aimed to achieve, but many reform advocates feel did not.

Read more

Government warned about threat to gambling harm support network after GambleAware closure

The Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) has told iGaming Expert that the UK Government’s move to a statutory levy “must not mean handing control to a narrow group of anti-gambling campaigners or creating a publicly funded cottage industry driven by ideology rather than evidence”.

Representing the regulated UK betting and gaming industry, the standards body’s statement comes in response to GambleAware announcing last week that it would undergo a “managed closure” by the end of March next year as a result of the new levy system.

The BGC highlighted the work achieved by GambleAware in providing gambling harm support, before reminding the UK Government that it is important to make sure funding is still made available to services who can offer help to those that need it the most.

A BGC spokesperson said: “GambleAware has played a central role in funding and commissioning independent research, education and treatment for more than two decades, underpinned by the voluntary contributions of the betting and gaming industry.

“This long-standing commitment, unmatched by other sectors, has helped establish and fund services that support thousands of people every year.

“While we campaigned for and support the Government’s decision to move to mandatory contributions, this must not mean handing control to a narrow group of anti-gambling campaigners or creating a publicly funded cottage industry driven by ideology rather than evidence.

“What matters is that funding remains independent, ringfenced and focused on delivering real outcomes for those at risk of harm.”

Industry concerns

Many in the gambling industry have raised concerns about the funding of services once the switch to the statutory levy takes place.

Deal Me Out has written to the Government asking for services to be treated fairly, while GAMSTOP Group highlighted the vital work GambleAware has done and stated that it believes this will continue under the statutory levy, adding that player welfare must be the focal point of all work.

GambleAware’s CEO Zoë Osmond has called on the levy’s Research, Prevention and Treatment Commissioners – the UK Research and Innovation, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, as well as NHS England and relevant bodies in Scotland and Wales – to build on the charity’s work.

Dan Waugh, Partner at Regulus Partners, believes the funding system is not living up to its billing and is creating more uncertainty for gambling harm treatment providers. BetBlocker Founder and Trustee, Duncan Garvie, added that service providers must be protected during the statutory levy transition period

Some of these statements were also echoed by the BGC, calling for any decisions that will be made to be based on facts.

The standards body said: “Industry contributions have totalled over £170m since 2020 alone, supporting NHS clinics, third-sector providers, and national education programmes. BGC members remain unequivocally committed to safer gambling, and to a robust, independent, and evidence-led system.

“The transition to a statutory levy must protect existing expertise, maintain service continuity, and ensure that decisions are based on data, not dogma.”

UK Gov wants ‘smooth and stable transition’

In response to GambleAware’s closure, the UK Government’s Minister for Gambling, Baroness Twycross, praised the charity’s work and the wider third sector, adding that the levy will build on their work and that a smooth transition to the new system is a priority.

“GambleAware and others across the third sector, including the National Gambling Support Network, have worked with tireless commitment over the years to commission and deliver effective services for people experiencing gambling-related harm,” noted Twycross.

“As the new statutory gambling levy system comes into effect, managing a smooth and stable transition is an absolute priority, and we are taking significant steps to maintain service provision. The new levy system will build on the successes of the current system to improve and expand efforts to further understand, tackle and treat harmful gambling.

“I want to thank GambleAware and all their staff for their efforts to support those in need across our country.”

Read more

GambleAware closure labelled ‘a tragedy’ ahead of levy implementation

The Statutory Levy has been described as causing an ‘exodus of talent’ from the UK’s gambling harm treatment and prevention sector, following news of GambleAware’s closure.

GambleAware stated that as a result of the statutory levy it will undergo a “managed closure” by the end of March 2026. The charity had been acting as the commissioner of gambling harm treatment programmes since its foundation in 2002.

Jordan Lea, Founder of DealMeOut, reacted to the news on LinkedIn, describing GambleAware as the most recognisable, and respected brands to the population, and holds vast, specialised expertise in research, evaluation and commissioning.

He added: “It is an aberration that the implementation of the Statutory levy is causing so many job losses, creating an exodus of talent from our sector.”

What is the statutory levy?

Following changes made by the government, operators in the UK are now required to contribute to a statutory levy to support research, education and treatment (RET), with contributions determined by companies’ gross gambling yield.

As a result, the NHS will now take over from third sector organisations, such as GambleAware, as the main administrator of the treatment and prevention of gambling harms.

Up to £100m per year is expected to be raised by the new levy. 20% of which will go to the Research Commissioner, UK Research and Innovation, to research to establish a bespoke Research Programme on Gambling, as well as the UK Gambling Commission, to direct further research in line with licensing objectives.

The Prevention Commissioner, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID), will receive 30% of the levy funding. OHID will develop a comprehensive approach to prevention and early intervention.

Meanwhile, 50% of the levy funding will go to the Treatment Commissioner, NHS England and relevant bodies in Scotland and Wales, who will commission treatment and support services in collaboration with the third sector.

Andy Boucher, Chair of trustees, GambleAware, commented: “The introduction of the new statutory levy and the appointment of the three new commissioners for gambling harms research, prevention and treatment means that, as expected, the work historically delivered by GambleAware will now transition to the UK government and new commissioners across England, Scotland and Wales.

“We have advocated for the introduction of a statutory system for many years and are proud of our contribution to its implementation. Alongside this, we are also proud of the impact GambleAware’s prevention and treatment activity has had in supporting tens of thousands of people over the years, through our national campaigns and our commissioned partners, including the National Gambling Support Network.

“Our main priority continues to be keeping people safe from gambling harm and to ensure stability and continuity for our beneficiaries as the new commissioners take over. The GambleAware website and critical prevention resources continue to provide accessible support for all.”

Building on current progress

Whilst Boucher welcomed the new era, he urged NHS England, OHID, UK Research and Innovation, and the appropriate bodies in Scotland and Wales to ‘build upon the current system’s achievements and insights to ensure learnings are carried forward’.

Reacting to the news, the Minister for Gambling Baroness Twycross, who is being charged with leading this new approach to addressing gambling harms, praised the work of GambleAware, and the wider third sector, and promised that the new levy will build on the work of such organisations.

She said: “As the new statutory gambling levy system comes into effect, managing a smooth and stable transition is an absolute priority, and we are taking significant steps to maintain service provision. The new levy system will build on the successes of the current system to improve and expand efforts to further understand, tackle and treat harmful gambling.

“I want to thank GambleAware and all their staff for their efforts to support those in need across our country.”

A crucial junction

GambleAware highlighted the importance of its work in May, revealing that it had witnessed a 50% increase in self-referrals to regional support providers since April 2023.

The figures from the charity revealed that over 110,000 people had accessed some level of support from its National Gambling Support Network (NGSN) since its foundation in April 2023. Brief interventions, typically a short conversation on how to reduce the risk of gambling harm saw a 93% increase.

As a result, this underlines the importance of a smooth transition to the stewardship of gambling harm treatment by the NHS to ensure that those in need get the necessary help.

…………….

September 15 will see SBC organise a ground breaking charity football event in Lisbon. Make sure you get the chance to see some of the most legendary names in football by securing your ticket today at https://www.legendscharitygame.com/

Read more