Underdog’s Guarddog invests in Regen automated savings platform

Underdog will soon offer a new responsible gambling tool that allows users to automatically convert gaming activity into financial savings.

Via its responsible play innovation fund GuardDog, Underdog has invested in Regen, the company that offers the auto-savings feature. Regen will be integrated as an option in Underdog’s responsible play hub and the operator will provide access to the tool to all of its users and employees.

An Underdog spokesperson said the Regen feature will be integrated soon across all fantasy sports and prediction markets play on the operator’s platform.

A customizable piggy bank

Founded in 2025, Regen works by automatically saving a small percentage from every wager or trade, whether it wins or loses, setting money aside in the background to create savings without the user having to change how they play.

Regen Co-Founder and CEO Daniel Prior told SBC Americas that the amount that is automatically siphoned off and saved is adjustable for each user. “They c..

Read more

UKGC: operators must make black market ‘commercially toxic’ for suppliers

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) is urging regulated operators to carry a fair share of the burden when it comes to battling back against the black market by making it “commercially toxic” for third-party companies to supply them.

This was the message from the UKGC’s Executive Director, Tim Miller, to industry stakeholders at ICE when addressing the current state of the UK gambling, stating that licensed operators in the market can’t “have their cake and eat” it.

Miller praised the increasing alignment between regulators and the legitimate industry on the importance of tackling the illegal market, adding that the commission is taking action.

He said, between April and December last year, the UKGC issued 592 cease and desists to advertisers and operators, reported 327,964 URLs to various search engines with 203,571 URLs removed so far, referred 839 websites to the search engines for delisting and disrupted 627 websites so that they have either been taken down or geo-blocked.

Miller argued that, as much as regulators and governments need to be aware of the impact they could have on channelisation rates with their decisions, operators need to be mindful of the role they could be playing in growing the threat of the illegal market.

“If we want consumers to make well-informed choices and, if not experiencing harm, remain in the licensed market, then there needs to be clear blue water between that and the unlicensed space,” noted Miller.

“But at the moment, the dividing line is being muddied by those who want to be a part of supplying legitimate, regulated operators, yet are either indifferent to whether they also facilitate the illegal market or are actively seeking to play both sides.

“Gambling regulators across the world are increasingly identifying suppliers, affiliates, advertisers, tech companies and others that work with licensed operators but who are also providing the same services to the illegal market.”

Miller stated that it must be made “commercially toxic” for any supplier to work with an unlicensed operator, even if it results in short term impacts of some competition reduction and consequential upward cost pressures, as it’s a “small price to pay” to not help build the illegal market.

He encouraged operators to go through a checklist before making partnerships, asking how they’re addressing the illegal market threat, their due diligence, as well as contractual provisions that can be put in place to make sure such deals don’t happen.

He continued: “As regulators, we will seek to use the powers available to us to take appropriate action against those who facilitate the provision of illegal gambling. However, when pulling the lever marked ‘legal action’, there is a hard reality that dragging a cloud services company based in, say, California or an affiliate marketer based in Curacao through the domestic courts will not always be practical or possible.

“That’s why, alongside a regulatory or law enforcement response, there is an important and essential role for industry to play. A role that is further upstream. A role with the aim of commercially strangling those third parties that facilitate unscrupulous operators to steal your customers or exploit vulnerable consumers.

“As a global, regulated industry, you have significant economic muscle and considerable commercial leverage. And for all of us here today with a shared desire to fight against the illegal market- well, I think we have overlooked this important and powerful weapon in our arsenal. And it’s time we deploy it.”

Meta

Miller also addressed Meta, which he says has seen more adverts for illegal online casinos appearing on their brand platforms using ‘not on gamstop’ signage to target customers who have self-excluded using GamStop.

The UKGC has been in contact with Meta about the issue, but Miller has stated that they have made “very limited progress” and that they should be doing more to fight against the illegal market.

“Their suggestion was that we should deploy AI tools ourselves to monitor and find these ads and then report them,” he said.

“I would be very surprised if Meta, as one of the world’s largest tech companies, is incapable of proactively using their own keyword facility to prevent the advertising of illegal gambling. It could leave you with the impression they are quite happy to turn a blind eye and continue taking money from criminals and scammers until someone shouts about it.”

Outlook

The recent additional £26m in funding the UKGC has received from the government through last November’s budget was addressed by Miller, who noted that it “recognises the success” the commission is starting to have.

The Government’s Crime and Policing Bill, currently at Committee Stage in the House of Lords, will also allow the UKGC “to obtain orders to suspend internet protocol – or IP – addresses and internet domain names linked to illegal gambling” when enacted. A comprehensive programme for its work against the black market is also in development.

“It’s also worth remembering that the Commission alone won’t be able to solve the challenge of illegal gambling,” added Miller.

“Success will only come through strong collective action with government, with international regulatory colleagues, with industry and with others so that we can hit this criminal market and those who provide succour to it from as many angles as possible – using regulation, using prosecutions, using legislation, using technology, using commercial pressure, using hard powers, using soft powers. Using everything in our collective arsenal.

“No one actor in this space can win this battle alone – we need to work together. We need to work together to ensure that there is no room for suppliers and other companies who want to benefit from the legitimate industry, whilst also actively undermining our collective efforts to tackle illegal gambling operators.

“Government, regulators and industry should no longer tolerate anyone having a foot in both camps. It’s time to work together. It’s time to force them to pick a side.”

Read more

Brazil Health Ministry heads problem gambling care strategy

Brazil’s Ministry of Health (MESP) has released a national guideline for medical professionals who administer care for those suffering from gambling harms.

The document expands on the country’s Unified Health System (SUS), and is aimed at professionals registered with the Psychosocial Care Network (RAPS), offering practical advice on how to monitor and treat problem gambling behaviour.

All guidelines were prepared as a result of close collaboration between MESP and experts in behavioural anomalies, including representatives from the Department of Mental Health, Alcohol and Drugs, as well as the Secretariat of Specialised Health Care.

MESP’s statement on the pressing need of the 73-page document highlighted that admissions to the SUS related to pathological gambling have grown significantly between 2018 and 2025, giving special attention to online betting abuse cases that have led to deteriorating mental health in patients, as well as financial hardships.

“With this set of measures, the Ministry of Health reinforces its commitment to the protection of the mental health of the population, the organisation of the SUS response and the offer of comprehensive, humanised and accessible care throughout the country,” the MESP added.

Guidelines do “more than recognising a growing pattern”

The guidelines cover aspects such as warning signs and patterns of problem gambling, support tools for evaluation and treatment, suitable responses to the severity of each case, as well as best practices for efficient collaboration with Psychosocial Care Centres situated across Brazil.

“The document arises from the collective commitment to understand and take care of the new forms of psychic suffering that emerge in the contemporary context, such as problems related to gambling and their relationship with the digital landscape,” the authors stated.

“More than recognising a growing phenomenon, it recommends how to improve the psychosocial care of affected people, considering the impacts on daily life, bonds and public health.

“Care must recognise that the problems related to betting games are not limited to an individual and mental health issue. These problems also manifest themselves as an expression of social, economic and cultural vulnerabilities, demanding territorial, intersectoral responses and based on listening and co-responsibility.”

Brazil recently celebrated the first anniversary of launching its regulated betting market back in January 2025. Since then, the gambling market in general has been significantly altered to protect the country’s vast population, including the launch of a national self-exclusion registry.

However, initiatives like the latest problem gambling guidelines show that there is still work to be done in that direction. This will be one of the key points at the SBC Summit Rio conference, which will bring the region’s top voices together on 3 March.

Read more

Fraudsters in Brazil get creative with self-exclusion exploit

Operators in Brazil report that opportunistic bettors are trying to exploit a loophole in the country’s national self-exclusion scheme.

Media outlet BNLData has received warnings from local gambling firms about players who are trying to defraud businesses by placing bets within the period between making a self-exclusion request and the operator fulfilling said request.

Brazil officially ratified its licensed betting market in January 2025, bringing millions of bettors into a regulated system that will feed back into the national economy. Overseen by the Secretariat of Prizes and Bets (SPA) under the Ministry of Finance, experts predict that the market will reach billions in value by the end of the decade.

Self-exclusion was one of the final steps in the legislative process, introduced in December last year. In the first 20 days of its inception, the registry saw 153,000 requests from players, BNLData added.

Championed by SPA Secretary Regis Dudena, the system works by receiving the self-exclusion request and automatically notifying operators about it, giving them a 72-hour period to go through with the blocking order.

This exact timeframe is being targeted by the bettors, who are wagering high sums which they then want back under the premise that they shouldn’t have been allowed on the platform in the first place.

Their success rate, however, remains a topic of speculation, as no operator has publicly confirmed any payouts made as a result of this fraud.

To put things into perspective, one case reported by BNLData involved a modest bettor, with their losses between 2024 and 2025 totalling around R$500 (£70).

On 2 January, the same player filed a self-exclusion request with SPA. Right after that, their activity showed multiple bets totalling R$5000 being placed with different sportsbook platforms, covering all outcomes of the same sports events.

They then tried to recover the accumulated losses by contacting the sportsbook providers, arguing that they’ve breached the law by allowing them to place a wager with a self-exclusion order in place. However, this is where details matter the most.

Operators would have been committing an offence if the self-exclusion was active, but bets and wagers are still considered valid if placed within the above-mentioned 72-hour period.

In addition, this appears to not be an isolated case, with multiple companies reporting the same pattern, pointing towards systematic fraud attempts.

Whilst this is unlikely to cause major damage to the gambling sector in Brazil, it could lead to SPA reevaluating the self-exclusion framework and introducing shorter enforcement timeframes.

Read more

NGCB votes to ban Matthew Bowyer from Nevada casinos

The illicit use of cash from an illegal gambling operation by Matthew Bowyer is resulting in further consequences for the former bookie, who was at the heart of a gambling scandal.

The Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB) has voted in favor of recommending Bowyer to be placed on the state’s List of Excluded Persons, also known as the “black book.” The black book excludes its listed members from entering and playing at Nevada casinos. The list places a permanent ban on the individuals, potentially ending Bowyer’s chances of gambling at the casinos where he used funds from his illegal gambling operation to wager.

“Normally, I wouldn’t give much airtime to this particular individual in this particular setting,” said NGCB Chairman Mike Dreitzer. “However, I think it’s important to note that today the board takes an action that goes to the very core and the heart of Nevada’s gaming regulatory mission: the protection of the integrity of gaming, the confidence of the public and the reputation..

Read more

NCAA basketball players included in federal indictment for point shaving

The integrity of college sports in America is being questioned again with a federal indictment that alleges point shaving by a large group of college basketball players.

According to court documents filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 26 people are alleged to operate a point-shaving scheme and have been hit with various charges that include bribery in sporting contests, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud.

The alleged misconduct involved NCAA and Chinese Basketball Association (CBA) games, with several defendants having ties to an ongoing NBA and rigged poker game case. The defendants with ties to the gambling schemes are Shane Hennen and Marves Fairley.

CBA player recruited by ‘fixers’

According to the indictment, between September 2022 and February 2025, several defendants in the case recruited an active CBA player to influence the outcomes of games. The conspirators allegedly bribed the CBA player to underperform, causing their respective teams to fail to c..

Read more

New York regulator mulls governor’s call to curb underage betting

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul vowed Tuesday to direct the regulator of the largest U.S. sports betting market to employ new measures to ensure that underage residents and visitors to the Empire State are not able to access licensed sportsbooks.

In her “State of the State” packet unveiled on Jan. 13, Hochul detailed numerous measures that she intends to utilize to protect New York minors from various harms, including stronger age verifications on social media sites and disabling location sharing and the use of AI chatbots.

“And let’s do more to cut off access to online sports gaming so that kinds are not ensnared by addiction at a young age,” she added to attendees at her address on Tuesday.

Biometrics key, says Hochul

In the 164-page agenda for her State of the State plan, Hochul’s office shared more information on how she intends to do this.

“As online sports betting becomes immensely popular, and new, more accessible online gambling platforms become more sophisticated, it is essent..

Read more

Latest fine issued in long-running battle against Dutch black market

Kansspelautoriteit (KSA), the Dutch Gambling Authority has issued two fines, one for failure to comply with player protection standards and another for illegal operations.

The larger of the two fines, standing at €4.2m, was issued to Starscream Ltd, which was found operating the brands of rantcasino.com, allstarzcasino.com, and sugarcasino.com without a Dutch licence.

This is the second time Starscream has been fined for illegally operating in the Netherlands, having been issued a €840,000 penalty in April last year. Both cases may demonstrate the difficulty of finding illegal operators, however – if a company is not licensed in a country, how can a regulator enforce payment of its penalty?

On a wider scale, the two fines against Starscream also demonstrate the continuing battle against the black market being waged in the Netherlands. Operators often argue that marketing restrictions and high taxation are a cause of the country’s black market woes.

Michel Groothuizen, Chairman of the board of the KSA, said: “The Netherlands Gambling Authority has a wide range of tools at its disposal to tackle illegal providers. Imposing administrative fines is one of them.

“Although collecting such fines presents challenges, particularly for parties outside the EU, with these fines we continue to send the message that we are taking a tough stance against illegal offerings in the Netherlands.”

KSA not easing up

The second fine issued this week is a much more typical one in the Netherlands, centring around player protection. The KSA has made player protection, particularly protection of younger and more vulnerable customers, a top priority in recent years.

Notable fines for player protection reasons in 2025 were issued to Unibet, LeoVegas and JOI Gaming, for the reasons of player supervision in the cases of Unibet and LeoVegas and advertising infractions in JOI Gaming’s case.

In the most recent instance, the KSA has fined Tulipa Ent Ltd, which trades as ComeOn the Netherlands, for failing to detect signs of excessive gambling behviaour among 10 young adult players on time. This included setting ‘excessive deposit limits’ and incurring thousands in losses over short periods of time.

Groothuizen added: “The Ksa previously found that providers’ implementation of their duty of care varied too widely and often left much to be desired. We therefore conducted additional research with various providers, resulting in the various duty of care fines we are now seeing.

“Providers absolutely must not let slip something as essential as the duty of care, especially when it concerns vulnerable target groups such as young adults.”

Read more

CJEU sides with Austria on gambling claims against Malta licences   

The long-standing legal battle of Austrian courts to enforce national laws and rules on foreign-licensed operators has reached a significant turning point.

This morning, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) provided a preliminary determination on the dispute between Austria Supreme Court and Malta referred for arbitration to the European Commission (EC).

The legal challenge was initiated in 2022 by an Austrian player who sued the Maltese business Titanium Brace Ltd – the placeholder name for a defunct licence of DACH market operator DrückGlück (drueckglueck.com).

The case spans over twenty years of regulatory and legislative changes in European gambling and member state law. However, the original challenge remains, as the plaintiff seeks to hold foreign-licensed operators accountable for offering unregulated gambling across borders.

Austrian courts uphold that the plaintiff has a right to reclaim losses, as the player had sued the former Maltese licence that had no authorisation to provide online gambling services in Austria.

However, citing Maltese law, Titanium Brace denied any payout, stating that its authority and compliance were accountable to the jurisdiction of Malta.

The case has been closely monitored by legal observers, who deem it a test for the CJEU to interpret EU single-market freedoms and member state autonomy over gambling regimes.

Following an extended review, the CJEU views that under the EU’s Rome II Regulation, local laws are applicable as a “non-contractual obligation”.

As such, the interpretation deems that liabilities can be claimed in the member state where the damage occurs, regardless of the licensing parameters of a business.

In online gambling cases, “the damage arises where the player resides, as that is where the financial loss and consumer protection interests manifest.”

Accordingly, the CJEU held that Austrian law would apply to the case, allowing the player to pursue claims under “domestic tort law”. However, the Court noted that if a tort is closely aligned to another member state, judges may apply that country’s law instead.

“The law applicable to a non-contractual obligation arising out of a tort or delict shall be the law of the country in which the damage occurs.

“In games of chance organised in another Member State without the necessary national licence, the law applicable to that damage is, in principle, that of the Member State in which that person has their habitual residence.”

With regard to the long-standing dispute, the CJEU deems that Austrian laws are applicable, due to the condition that Austria has specific consumer protection rules , a determining factor that could be referenced against Titanium Brace.

The CJEU underscores that its ruling is a preliminary matter, as the arbitration aims to interpret EU law – the CJEU does not decide legal outcomes. To proceed with settlements, Austrian courts must apply the CJEU’s interpretation when ruling on the actual case.

Fragmented Europe

Though preliminary, the CJEU determination will have significant ramifications for wider challenges against Malta-licensed operators and its courts.

Similar disputes over player loss claims have been submitted by German courts, most notably a 2023 case (C-440/23) involving a customer in Hesse seeking to recover losses from Lottoland as an unlicensed operator. The challenge was referred to the European Court of Justice by the Regional Court of Gießen.

The German case has since received an Advocate General opinion favourable to Malta, stating that “claims for restitution of stakes under national law do not fall foul of the EU doctrine of abuse of rights.”

The Advocate General reasoned that “restitution claims are governed by national contract and civil law, not by EU market freedoms such as the freedom to provide services, and thus do not inherently constitute abuse of EU law.”

Malta stands by Bill 55

The conflicts have spanned significant changes in national legislation on gambling across multiple EU member states. In 2023, Malta’s government proceeded to codify Bill 55, endorsed by the Ministry of Finance and the Malta Gaming Authority (MGA), as Article 56A of the Gaming Act.

The amendment allowed Maltese courts to refuse recognition or enforcement of foreign judgments against Malta-licensed businesses, provided that the disputed gambling activities were lawful under Maltese regulation.

Upon its introduction, the Maltese government was requested to explain Bill 55 to the EC, as the member states of the Netherlands, Germany, and Austria raised objections.

Malta was accused of effectively shielded online gambling operators from legal responsibility and undermined enforcement of national authorities.

The government justified the measure as necessary to protect the integrity of its licensing regime and uphold EU principles of service freedom, arguing that Malta’s remote gaming framework should not be undermined by conflicting national laws elsewhere in Europe.

Malta maintains the provisions of Bill 55 within its Gaming Act. The government cites that, to date, no Maltese court has applied or enforced its protections in cross-border disputes concerning online gambling conflicts.

Read more